42
   

Snowdon is a dummy

 
 
izzythepush
 
  1  
Thu 1 Aug, 2013 07:00 am
@ehBeth,
Nobody will give a **** about his human rights. The Pope and Dalai Llama have issued a joint communique recommending the rack just on general principles.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -1  
Thu 1 Aug, 2013 07:28 am
@ehBeth,
ehBeth wrote:
Perhaps there is an upside to NSA monitoring everything Oralloy posts. It should be easy to pull its dossier when it decompensates completely.

I have nothing to hide. The NSA is welcome to monitor and record all my traffic in their efforts to protect us all from the bad guys.

I do not intend to ever commit any act of the sort that would result in some official needing to notice my existence.

What's this "it" nonsense?
BillRM
 
  4  
Thu 1 Aug, 2013 07:38 am
@oralloy,
Somehow most of us do not care for the idea that a bore government employee can read our love emails to our mates for example.

Next there is a problem of government agents blackmailing our leadership with the information gain on their private life as Hoover did but on a must larger scale.

My question is why the hell do you care so must for the second amendment but not the fourth amendment?
BillRM
 
  3  
Thu 1 Aug, 2013 07:55 am
@oralloy,
By the way was you not for the federal government having a list of gun owners due to you not trusting them with that information and yet you trust the SOBs to have every bit of information that go over the internet on everyone is a searchable datebase?

Strange thinking indeed to my mind and I guess if the government stated that if for national security reasons that they need to know who have firearms and who does not you would be fine with it also?
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Thu 1 Aug, 2013 08:04 am
Frankly I’d rather have my balls operated on with a chainsaw than agree with Oralloy on anything (and I do think most of what he says is nonsense)…but I agree with him completely on the notion that if the people we have elected to govern the country have determined that the surveillance is beneficial to protecting the country from terroristic attack…I am all for allowing them to do so.

I recognize and acknowledge that my “rights of privacy” are important to me…but I also recognize and acknowledge that an orderly, safe society requires giving up individual privacy…and that the amount of “give up” increases as the society gets more complex.

The nonsense being raised by both sides of the political spectrum on this is nothing more than static. Any rights we suppose we have to individual privacy are going to be pared more and more with each passing day…and frankly, I do not see that as the dark negative some people are painting it to be.

But if you must consider this an indication that “the terrorists have won”…fine. Do so. But I want the surveillance and I freely give up this “right to privacy” I really do not need nor treasure.
BillRM
 
  3  
Thu 1 Aug, 2013 08:11 am
@Frank Apisa,
Quote:
but I agree with him completely on the notion that if the people we have elected to govern the country have determined that the surveillance is beneficial to protecting the country from terroristic attack…I am all for allowing them to do so


That nice and if to prevent child abuse the government wish to have web cams in every household that have minors in them that would be fine with you also?

After all such surveillance would be of benefit in reducing child abuse the majority happening not by strangers in parks but in the children homes behind close doors.
0 Replies
 
JPB
 
  4  
Thu 1 Aug, 2013 08:12 am
@Frank Apisa,
I think it was engineer (or perhaps it was Thomas) who said earlier in this thread that you are well within your rights to give up your right to privacy, but you are not within your rights to give up mine, or to give up the constitutionally guaranteed rights of anyone else. Neither are our elected officials.

I almost never agree with BillRM on anything, but I agree with him here, particularly when it's a 2Aer who is so much in favor of throwing out the 4th.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  3  
Thu 1 Aug, 2013 08:16 am
@Frank Apisa,
I'm trying to follow your ideas, Frank.

These surveillance programs cost a lot of money.
Wouldn't it be better that any US-American sends his letters, emails, banc transfers, shopping lists etc etc at first for approval to an US-agency, which then takes further action?

And for the spying of allies: either they accept to do the same with their citizens (under US-control, of course!) or they are enemies.
RABEL222
 
  3  
Thu 1 Aug, 2013 09:09 am
This site is getting more and more like the gun nut sites. Everyone is going off the deep end. People who agree that regulation of gun ownership is ok in some instances seem to think that surveillance of any kind is bad. I think that in the right place it is good but needs to be kept track of by some other agency. Wait, isent that the job of congress?
Walter Hinteler
 
  2  
Thu 1 Aug, 2013 09:25 am
Quote:
NSA pays £100m in secret funding for GCHQ

Secret payments revealed in leaks by Edward Snowden
• GCHQ expected to 'pull its weight' for Americans
• Weaker regulation of British spies 'a selling point' for NSA

The US government has paid at least £100m to the UK spy agency GCHQ over the last three years to secure access to and influence over Britain's intelligence gathering programmes.

The top secret payments are set out in documents which make clear that the Americans expect a return on the investment, and that GCHQ has to work hard to meet their demands.

"GCHQ must pull its weight and be seen to pull its weight," a GCHQ strategy briefing said.

The funding underlines the closeness of the relationship between GCHQ and its US equivalent, the National Security Agency. But it will raise fears about the hold Washington has over the UK's biggest and most important intelligence agency, and whether Britain's dependency on the NSA has become too great.

... ... ...
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  2  
Thu 1 Aug, 2013 09:27 am
@RABEL222,
Quote:
seem to think that surveillance of any kind is bad.


Any kind repeat any kind such as the recordings of all 100 billions plus a year fronts and backs of all letters passing through the US post office and the inspection of all non encrypted internet traffic and so on.......................

We are way beyond some surveillance and that is just what is coming out so far.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  5  
Thu 1 Aug, 2013 10:26 am
pressure cookers, backpacks and quinoa, oh my!
Quote:
It was a confluence of magnificent proportions that led six agents from the joint terrorism task force to knock on my door Wednesday morning. Little did we know our seemingly innocent, if curious to a fault, Googling of certain things was creating a perfect storm of terrorism profiling. Because somewhere out there, someone was watching. Someone whose job it is to piece together the things people do on the internet raised the red flag when they saw our search history.

Most of it was innocent enough. I had researched pressure cookers. My husband was looking for a backpack. And maybe in another time those two things together would have seemed innocuous, but we are in “these times” now. And in these times, when things like the Boston bombing happen, you spend a lot of time on the internet reading about it and, if you are my exceedingly curious news junkie of a twenty-ear-old son, you click a lot of links when you read the myriad of stories. You might just read a CNN piece about how bomb making instructions are readily available on the internet and you will in all probability, if you are that kid, click the link provided.

Which might not raise any red flags. Because who wasn’t reading those stories? Who wasn’t clicking those links? But my son’s reading habits combined with my search for a pressure cooker and my husband’s search for a backpack set off an alarm of sorts at the joint terrorism task force headquarters.

That’s how I imagine it played out, anyhow. Lots of bells and whistles and a crowd of task force workers huddled around a computer screen looking at our Google history.

This was weeks ago. I don’t know what took them so long to get here. Maybe they were waiting for some other devious Google search to show up but “what the hell do I do with quinoa” and “Is A-Rod suspended yet” didn’t fit into the equation so they just moved in based on those older searches.

I was at work when it happened. My husband called me as soon as it was over, almost laughing about it but I wasn’t joining in the laughter. His call left me shaken and anxious.

What happened was this: At about 9:00 am, my husband, who happened to be home yesterday, was sitting in the living room with our two dogs when he heard a couple of cars pull up outside. He looked out the window and saw three black SUVs in front of our house; two at the curb in front and one pulled up behind my husband’s Jeep in the driveway, as if to block him from leaving.

Six gentleman in casual clothes emerged from the vehicles and spread out as they walked toward the house, two toward the backyard on one side, two on the other side, two toward the front door.

A million things went through my husband’s head. None of which were right. He walked outside and the men greeted him by flashing badges. He could see they all had guns holstered in their waistbands.

“Are you [name redacted]?” one asked while glancing at a clipboard. He affirmed that was indeed him, and was asked if they could come in. Sure, he said.

They asked if they could search the house, though it turned out to be just a cursory search. They walked around the living room, studied the books on the shelf (nope, no bomb making books, no Anarchist Cookbook), looked at all our pictures, glanced into our bedroom, pet our dogs. They asked if they could go in my son’s bedroom but when my husband said my son was sleeping in there, they let it be.

Meanwhile, they were peppering my husband with questions. Where is he from? Where are his parents from? They asked about me, where was I, where do I work, where do my parents live. Do you have any bombs, they asked. Do you own a pressure cooker? My husband said no, but we have a rice cooker. Can you make a bomb with that? My husband said no, my wife uses it to make quinoa. What the hell is quinoa, they asked.

They searched the backyard. They walked around the garage, as much as one could walk around a garage strewn with yardworking equipment and various junk. They went back in the house and asked more questions.

Have you ever looked up how to make a pressure cooker bomb? My husband, ever the oppositional kind, asked them if they themselves weren’t curious as to how a pressure cooker bomb works, if they ever looked it up. Two of them admitted they did.

By this point they had realized they were not dealing with terrorists. They asked my husband about his work, his visits to South Korea and China. The tone was conversational.

They never asked to see the computers on which the searches were done. They never opened a drawer or a cabinet. They left two rooms unsearched. I guess we didn’t fit the exact profile they were looking for so they were just going through the motions.

They mentioned that they do this about 100 times a week. And that 99 of those visits turn out to be nothing. I don’t know what happens on the other 1% of visits and I’m not sure I want to know what my neighbors are up to.

45 minutes later, they shook my husband’s hand and left. That’s when he called me and relayed the story. That’s when I felt a sense of creeping dread take over. What else had I looked up? What kind of searches did I do that alone seemed innocent enough but put together could make someone suspicious? Were they judging me because my house was a mess (Oh my god, the joint terrorism task force was in my house and there were dirty dishes in my sink!). Mostly I felt a great sense of anxiety. This is where we are at. Where you have no expectation of privacy. Where trying to learn how to cook some lentils could possibly land you on a watch list. Where you have to watch every little thing you do because someone else is watching every little thing you do.

All I know is if I’m going to buy a pressure cooker in the near future, I’m not doing it online.

I’m scared. And not of the right things.
JTT
 
  1  
Thu 1 Aug, 2013 10:32 am
@oralloy,
What in heavens name has caused you to read a British news source, Oralboy? You've got to stay focused only on the propaganda issued by your government disseminated by the US mainstream media.

That's the pablum that you've been raised on and that's all your brain washed puddle of gray matter can handle.

I see that you're still fantasizing about blowing up innocent civilians. It's been a while hasn't it. The US has just got to invade another country.
JPB
 
  2  
Thu 1 Aug, 2013 10:38 am
@Walter Hinteler,
Disgusting.
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  2  
Thu 1 Aug, 2013 10:51 am
I am not a fan of Snowden. I prefer the government spying on us. That is how the recent child trafficking ring was busted and 100 pedophile pimps were put in jail, where Snowden and Manning also belong.

You will not mind government spying either if you have nothing to hide. These men are traitors in my eyes.
JPB
 
  2  
Thu 1 Aug, 2013 10:54 am
@RexRed,
RexRed wrote:

I am not a fan of Snowden. I prefer the government spying on us. That is how the recent child trafficking ring was busted and 100 pedophile pimps were put in jail, where Snowden and Manning also belong.

You will not mind government spying either if you have nothing to hide. These men are traitors in my eyes.


The "only those with something to hide are concerned about the constitutional right to privacy" is total bullshit. I don't have anything to hide either, but I mind a great deal that my government thinks it's entitled to know my every move. Did you read Walter's link above? Is that really the world you want to live in?
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  0  
Thu 1 Aug, 2013 11:02 am
@RexRed,
Land of the brave and home of the free.

Land of the "brave" which bombs innocents from high in the sky, home of the "free", what a monstrous joke this whole thing is! A government acting as bad as the Nazis, the worst of the totalitarian governments and so many think this is peachy.
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  0  
Thu 1 Aug, 2013 11:08 am
@Frank Apisa,
Quote:
but I agree with him completely on the notion that if the people we have elected to govern the country have determined that the surveillance is beneficial to protecting the country from terroristic attack…I am all for allowing them to do so.


But you're just a dupe, Frank.


Quote:
If I were the president, I could stop terrorist attacks against the United States in a few days.

Permanently.

I would first apologize to all the widows and orphans, the tortured and impoverished, and all the many millions of other victims of American imperialism.

Then I would announce, in all sincerity, to every corner of the world, that America's global interventions have come to an end, and inform Israel that it is no longer the 51st state of the USA but now -- oddly enough -- a foreign country.

I would then reduce the military budget by at least 90% and use the savings to pay reparations to the victims. There would be more than enough money.

One year's military budget of 330 billion dollars is equal to more than $18,000 an hour for every hour since Jesus Christ was born.

That's what I'd do on my first three days in the White House. On the fourth day, I'd be assassinated.

- William Blum
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  0  
Thu 1 Aug, 2013 11:10 am
@Frank Apisa,
Quote:
Frankly I’d rather have my balls operated on with a chainsaw than agree with Oralloy on anything


That's certainly an irrealis situation, Frank, because obviously you no longer have any balls.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Thu 1 Aug, 2013 11:17 am
@Walter Hinteler,
Walter Hinteler wrote:

I'm trying to follow your ideas, Frank.

These surveillance programs cost a lot of money.
Wouldn't it be better that any US-American sends his letters, emails, banc transfers, shopping lists etc etc at first for approval to an US-agency, which then takes further action?

And for the spying of allies: either they accept to do the same with their citizens (under US-control, of course!) or they are enemies.


I suspect you are NOT trying to follow my ideas, Walter.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Snowdon is a dummy
  3. » Page 67
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.16 seconds on 11/23/2024 at 06:24:52