@Moment-in-Time,
I really appreciate the irony of being called two faced by a "feminist" who talks about what the men in her life have done for the country when asked about her own personal contribution. It doesn't sound like any of the feminists I know, they'd call you a feminist of convenience.
Have you ever considered that people can have different ethical standards from your own but still be ethical? Don't bother answering that, it's clear you haven't, like the terrorists of ISIS you can't contemplate another moral code being on an equal standing to your own. And your ethics stink, nineteenth century imperialistic enlightened despotism. You know what's best for every one else, and feel you have the God given right to tell everyone else what to do.
I always thought OmSigDavid was being unduly paranoid when he told me "liberals" hated freedom, after some exchanges with you I can see his point.
I'm pleased you've dropped the phony, schmaltzy, passive aggressive, control freak act with me, and are now showing your true colours, a rare moment of honesty. You're still doing it with the others though, after your over the top, honeyed praise of Rabel, Frank and GB, Rabel has now had the impertinence to disagree with you about something. How are you going to get him back on line? What would Kitchener do?
Being called names by you is like being called a bit of a **** by Shitty the ****, The **** House, Shitterton by the ****, Shitville, Shitrovia.
You're proof that one can share many political ideals with someone but still find them completely repulsive as a person, and nothing disgusts me more than a control freak.