42
   

Snowdon is a dummy

 
 
glitterbag
 
  2  
Mon 10 Feb, 2014 03:09 pm
@Olivier5,
Olivier5 wrote:

Quote:
I've been in this forum a lot longer than you, Olivier.

Maybe you've been here for too long.


You've been here since 8 May 2013. You haven't established the credibility to tell other members they have been here too long. Just saying.
Olivier5
 
  1  
Mon 10 Feb, 2014 03:15 pm
@glitterbag,
Don't worry glitter, I'm an old fart too.
JTT
 
  -1  
Mon 10 Feb, 2014 03:20 pm
@glitterbag,
Glitterbag: You've been here since 8 May 2013. You haven't established the credibility to tell other members they have been here too long. Just saying.

-------------

What an idiotic response!
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Mon 10 Feb, 2014 03:29 pm
@Olivier5,
... avec un ton flamand...
Olivier5
 
  1  
Mon 10 Feb, 2014 03:32 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Hey Walter, have you been here long enough to tell me this? Wink
Moment-in-Time
 
  1  
Mon 10 Feb, 2014 03:36 pm
@izzythepush,
Quote:

After the treatment of Bradley Manning, a lot of us think the idea that Snowden could get a fair trial, as things stand, is ludicrous.


What I find "ludicrous" is a non-American citizen on this forum acting as if he's an expert on the American justice system. Snowden is not going to be tried without a "fair" trial. His crimes will be brought be fore a jury of his peers. What proof do you currently have that the American justice system is not going to try Snowden publicly before his peers?!?
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Mon 10 Feb, 2014 03:37 pm
@Olivier5,
Forcément! Wink
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Mon 10 Feb, 2014 03:40 pm
@Moment-in-Time,
Moment-in-Time wrote:

Quote:

After the treatment of Bradley Manning, a lot of us think the idea that Snowden could get a fair trial, as things stand, is ludicrous.


What I find "ludicrous" is a non-American citizen on this forum acting as if he's an expert on the American justice system. Snowden is not going to be tried without a "fair" trial. His crimes will be brought be fore a jury of his peers. What proof do you currently have that the American justice system is not going to try Snowden publicly before his peers?!?


Or that it will not be a fair trial.

These people simply do not want a "fair trial"...but cannot acknowledge that. They want Snowden to be considered a hero...and not face any trial at all.
Walter Hinteler
 
  3  
Mon 10 Feb, 2014 03:41 pm
@Moment-in-Time,
Moment-in-Time wrote:
His crimes will be brought be fore a jury of his peers. What proof do you currently have that the American justice system is not going to try Snowden publicly before his peers?!?
Snowden is charged under the Espionage Act of 1917.
izzythepush
 
  2  
Mon 10 Feb, 2014 03:42 pm
@Moment-in-Time,
It's also non Americans who have granted Snowden asylum. Americans don't rule the world anymore. You're going convince a lot more non Americans that your legal system, (which still practices the barbarity of capital punishment) gives fair trials. Judging from the responses of other non Americans on this thread, that won't be easy.
JTT
 
  0  
Mon 10 Feb, 2014 03:43 pm
@Moment-in-Time,
I first thought this was apisa but same diff. Even with your appalling ignorance of so many things american, MiT, you regularly opine on much.
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  0  
Mon 10 Feb, 2014 03:50 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Here's Apisa, continually ranting about how it's so important for a man who exposed criminals to be tried but he, and MiT, don't want the Bush gang , or any other high officials to be prosecuted for their heinous crimes.

Do either of you understand "the rule of law"?
Olivier5
 
  1  
Mon 10 Feb, 2014 03:51 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Ok, alors ça va... Wink
0 Replies
 
Olivier5
 
  1  
Mon 10 Feb, 2014 03:53 pm
@JTT,
I agree that George W Bush deserves a fair trial.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Mon 10 Feb, 2014 03:54 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Quote:
If you want to fantasize that you are teaching me something, Olivier....be my guest. The way you tag after me makes me charitable toward you. But you really ought do your cruising somewhere else.


He's run that number on me a good few times Olivier. And me being a good laugh. He's stopped now for some reason. I can't think what because being fancied and laughing is supposed to be great. The girls on the bar-stools seem to love it.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Mon 10 Feb, 2014 03:56 pm
@glitterbag,
It's nothing to me gbag how long somebody has been on here. It's what they post.
0 Replies
 
Moment-in-Time
 
  1  
Mon 10 Feb, 2014 03:56 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Quote:

These people simply do not want a "fair trial"...but cannot acknowledge that. They want Snowden to be considered a hero...and not face any trial at all.


Yes, Snoweden is a hero to many with a somewhat spite against the US for whatever reason. Concurrently, among our many foreign allies, there are those who admire the US very much but yet seemingly look for flaws and are happy when the powerful US seem to have stumbled.

It's fine to have critics since perfection of any nation is unattainable, but this holding Snowden who absconded with US confidential documents, making him into an international hero is just too much. There must be some loyalty to one's land of birth. He could have gone to a number of people with his suspicions about NSF spying, but he "made himself judge and jury" over this intellectual classified material, that I have no respect for him. No one in the US of stature recommends amnesty for Snowden and in fact hearts have hardened..
Moment-in-Time
 
  1  
Mon 10 Feb, 2014 04:08 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Quote:
Moment-in-Time wrote:
His crimes will be brought be fore a jury of his peers. What proof do you currently have that the American justice system is not going to try Snowden publicly before his peers?



Quote:

Walater Hinteler wrote:
Snowden is charged under the Espionage Act of 1917.


Interesting. Thank you, Walter Hinteler for this additional information. Snowden might be able to appeal and subsequently, the case might be thrown out.....who knows?

An excerpt from Wiki below:

"Among those charged with offenses under the Act are German-American socialist congressman and newspaper editor Victor Berger, former Watch Tower Bible & Tract Society president Joseph Franklin Rutherford, communists Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, Pentagon Papers whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg, Cablegate whistleblower Chelsea Manning (formerly Bradley), and NSA contractor and whistleblower Edward Snowden. Rutherford's conviction was overturned on appeal.[1] The most controversial sections of the Act, including the original section 3, under which Rutherford was convicted, were repealed in 1921.[2]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Espionage_Act_of_1917
0 Replies
 
Olivier5
 
  3  
Mon 10 Feb, 2014 04:09 pm
@Frank Apisa,
I joke a few days ago that you were in love with me, and used the term "unrequited" at that occasion. And lo and behold, today you argue the exact same thing and use the exact same word... I guess imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. Smile
spendius
 
  2  
Mon 10 Feb, 2014 04:11 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Quote:
These people simply do not want a "fair trial"...but cannot acknowledge that.


That's not true. I have acknowledged that I don't particularly want Eddie getting a fair trial. I'm not convinced that the administration does either.

Quote:
They want Snowden to be considered a hero.


I don't. He is a hero to real constitutionalists otherwise there is nothing to discuss. Whether he was misguided or not he claims to have been protecting the Constitution and the Bill of Rights from the exact situation the documents were written to prevent.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Snowdon is a dummy
  3. » Page 277
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.08 seconds on 07/15/2025 at 06:38:15