42
   

Snowdon is a dummy

 
 
JTT
 
  1  
Mon 8 Jul, 2013 01:43 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Quote:
The EU must weigh their principles


"principles" - now that is a good one, CI!! JoefromChicago will likely be along shortly to agree with you on "principles". Maybe FrankA will drop in. You might even see Firefly, if she can spare the time moralizing about other weighty issues.

As you are well aware, there's no shortage at all, when it comes to these hypocrites.

Such has been/is the power of US propaganda.

0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Mon 8 Jul, 2013 01:43 pm
@izzythepush,
But it's the EU that's making this issue a big deal. Have you seen the US ignore trade negotiation with any of the Euro countries?
JTT
 
  1  
Mon 8 Jul, 2013 01:45 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Quote:
But Walter...human history sorta directs us to suppose


That's not human history, Frank, it's US propaganda. Something you actually did learn well, something in which you definitely are "top of the class".
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  1  
Mon 8 Jul, 2013 01:46 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Of course it is, because it is a big deal. The EU hasn't done anything wrong.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Mon 8 Jul, 2013 01:49 pm
@izzythepush,
What Snowden revealed was that British intelligence did snoop.
Here's a Guardian article.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2013/jun/16/gchq-intercepted-communications-g20-summits
Walter Hinteler
 
  2  
Mon 8 Jul, 2013 01:51 pm
@Frank Apisa,
I've "eliminated" two by-laws (one by the interior ministry, the other by the justice ministry) which dealt with data collection and illegal data transfers between 'institutions' of both ministries.

I've worked with an organisation within the justice ministry and was 'hired' by a department of the State Criminal Police Office.
So I do know a bit .... besides that I had to help the military secret service 40 years ago.

Certainly, there are some kinds of "black lists".
And when you ask for your stored data, they don't tell you more than for a very specified reason (e.g., you have to ask ask for data they collected during a demonstration or similar - you can't do it generally).

But since we went through two long periods, where the then governments collected all and everything about their citizens ... we don't want it anymore.
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Mon 8 Jul, 2013 01:54 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Quote:
Have you seen the US ignore trade negotiation with any of the Euro countries?


We've all seen the US refuse to even consider trade negotiations with numerous countries, instead, opting for illegal invasions, setting up brutal dictators who then allowed the US to steal the poor's wealth.

How is it that y'all keep missing all these facts of history, CI, when the historical record is so abundantly clear?

Smedley Butler didn't lie.

Quote:
I spent 33 years and four months in active military service and during that period I spent most of my time as a high class muscle man for Big Business, for Wall Street and the bankers. In short, I was a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism. I helped make Mexico and especially Tampico safe for American oil interests in 1914. I helped make Haiti and Cuba a decent place for the National City Bank boys to collect revenues in. I helped in the raping of half a dozen Central American republics for the benefit of Wall Street.

I helped purify Nicaragua for the International Banking House of Brown Brothers in 1902-1912. I brought light to the Dominican Republic for the American sugar interests in 1916. I helped make Honduras right for the American fruit companies in 1903. In China in 1927 I helped see to it that Standard Oil went on its way unmolested. Looking back on it, I might have given Al Capone a few hints. The best he could do was to operate his racket in three districts. I operated on three continents.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smedley_Butler

0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  1  
Mon 8 Jul, 2013 01:55 pm
@cicerone imposter,
I'm not doubting it, but the way it worked was that the CIA had greater powers to spy on British citizens than they did Americans MI5 had no such reciprocal power regarding American citizens.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Mon 8 Jul, 2013 01:59 pm
@izzythepush,
Oh, so now it's a matter of "degree." LOL
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Mon 8 Jul, 2013 02:05 pm
@cicerone imposter,
I kindly remind you, c.i., that these negotiations are between the USA and the EU - the UK's secret services are no EU-institutions nor does the UK (at least not before the next election, I suppose ... ) make an own deal with the USA.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  1  
Mon 8 Jul, 2013 02:07 pm
@cicerone imposter,
It's a lot more than that. It wasn't that long ago that the CIA spread rumours about Harold Wilson being a Russian spy, and were instrumental in his early resignation.

That's just what we know about. Chris Mullin summed it up quite well.

0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Mon 8 Jul, 2013 02:13 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Quote:
Oh, so now it's a matter of "degree." LOL


It's always been a matter of degree, CI. LOL. The UK has been guilty of much when it comes to the same thing that the US long ago took over. Since WWII, the US has been nothing but a marauding band of pirates. You won't like that comparison but history shows that to be the case. LOL

Consider the Monroe Doctrine, set up by the US in 1823, to establish the US as the sole power to rape and pillage the countries of the Americas. And rape and pillage it did. LOL

But as you well know, but go to great lengths to avoid addressing, it didn't limit itself to the Americas. LOL

I will advance that the US has been much more brutal throughout its imperialist period than the UK was in its. Though, of course, one has to allow that the UK has continued as a poodle imperialist. LOL
0 Replies
 
joefromchicago
 
  1  
Mon 8 Jul, 2013 02:13 pm
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:

What particularly rankles is that although US citizens were offered some protection from their intrusive security services, EU citizens had none.

Of course you do. You have your own governments, after all. If the UK didn't do enough to protect you from US spying, you should complain to your own government. Evidently, it wasn't doing its job.
Walter Hinteler
 
  2  
Mon 8 Jul, 2013 02:14 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Frank Apisa wrote:

And you know for a fact that your government is not playing the same kinds of games on its citizens that you suppose the government of the US is playing on its? Confused
This ...
http://i42.tinypic.com/10wmkr5.jpg
... is a graph from NADIS, the information-system of all our domestic secret services (16 state's and the federal one). It shows, data of how many citizens (in million) are stored on the 1rst of January of each year.

I do admit, though, that there can always be illegal activities, which aren't shown.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Mon 8 Jul, 2013 02:17 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
That's all some of us are trying to say; that we really don't know what each countries intelligence agencies are doing - because they are done in SECRET.

To assume countries who deny they do something illegal is self-serving at best, and not factual.

0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Mon 8 Jul, 2013 02:17 pm
@joefromchicago,
Quote:
Evidently, it wasn't doing its job.


But evidently, HonestJoe is doing his.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  0  
Mon 8 Jul, 2013 02:23 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Walter Hinteler wrote:

Frank Apisa wrote:

And you know for a fact that your government is not playing the same kinds of games on its citizens that you suppose the government of the US is playing on its? Confused
This ...
http://i42.tinypic.com/10wmkr5.jpg
... is a graph from NADIS, the information-system of all our domestic secret services (16 state's and the federal one). It shows, data of how many citizens (in million) are stored on the 1rst of January of each year.

I do admit, though, that there can always be illegal activities, which aren't shown.


From your last two posts...may I deduce that you do not know for sure? You suppose your government is not doing some of the stuff our government thinks may be helpful in preventing terroristic attacks.

Many people in the US also thought that way about our government.

I was not one of them.

I supposed that the government was going to do many, many things that we were not going to like, in order to prevent (insofar as is possible) as many terroristic attacks as possible.

I also suspect (and will go on record here as saying) that we are probably one really effective terroristic attack (of the like of 9/11) from causing people to run for office PROMISING to do things that will make the stuff currently being disclosed look like piddly little nonsense. (And those people will be elected.)

Perhaps you see that as "Well, then the terrorists have won."

Yup, maybe they have.

That is one of the possibilities.

Most
RABEL222
 
  1  
Mon 8 Jul, 2013 02:29 pm
@cicerone imposter,
He is obviously rabid anti US of A but some of the things he points out are true. His shortcoming is in not recognizing that almost all governments have done the same thing to more or less of a degree. I would never defend his opinions because he is so partisan to one opinion. I disreguard everything he posts because he is unreasonable.
JTT
 
  2  
Mon 8 Jul, 2013 02:33 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Quote:
I supposed that the government was going to do many, many things that we were not going to like, in order to prevent (insofar as is possible) as many terroristic attacks as possible.


Still you advance this egregious propaganda, Frank, never acknowledging the truth, that these piddly events that have occurred against the US are but a miniscule fraction of the terrorism the US has been engaged in for over a century.

Quote:
I also suspect (and will go on record here as saying) that we are probably one really effective terroristic attack (of the like of 9/11) from causing people to run for office PROMISING to do things that will make the stuff currently being disclosed look like piddly little nonsense. (And those people will be elected.)


Y'all have always been so easy to terrify, Frank. Again, you ignore history and the truth to pretend that you are revealing something new tat no one has ever thought of before.

This isn't your usual 'top of the class' stuff, Frank.
Frank Apisa
 
  -2  
Mon 8 Jul, 2013 02:35 pm
@JTT,
JTT wrote:

Quote:
I supposed that the government was going to do many, many things that we were not going to like, in order to prevent (insofar as is possible) as many terroristic attacks as possible.


Still you advance this egregious propaganda, Frank, never acknowledging the truth, that these piddly events that have occurred against the US are but a miniscule fraction of the terrorism the US has been engaged in for over a century.

Quote:
I also suspect (and will go on record here as saying) that we are probably one really effective terroristic attack (of the like of 9/11) from causing people to run for office PROMISING to do things that will make the stuff currently being disclosed look like piddly little nonsense. (And those people will be elected.)


Y'all have always been so easy to terrify, Frank. Again, you ignore history and the truth to pretend that you are revealing something new tat no one has ever thought of before.

This isn't your usual 'top of the class' stuff, Frank.



http://www.sherv.net/cm/emo/funny/1/vomit.gif

 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Snowdon is a dummy
  3. » Page 24
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.2 seconds on 11/25/2024 at 05:21:22