Snowdon is a dummy

I think some of the people I used to think were logical have caught the paranoia of the tea party.

Bush's "they hate our freedoms" line was quickly followed by interpreting laws that budged against those freedoms into usurping them completely.

Wouldent this help the people who want to kill all the U S of A citizens? I think some of the people I used to think were logical have caught the paranoia of the tea party.

Paranoids on this site are rampant.

Paranoids on this site are rampant.

But the tea partiers are all right with this because they have their guns, temporary constitutional right, till the paranoids gain complete control and take the right to own one from everyone but the paranoids.

Ted Cruz's file:
Cruz
Ted Cruz's website

Our Ted Cruz feeds
RSS A feed of statements by Cruz
RSS A feed stories mentioning Cruz

Cruz's statements by ruling
Click on the ruling to see all of Cruz's statements for that ruling.
True1 (4%)(1)
Mostly True3 (13%)(3)
Half True4 (17%)(4)
Mostly False4 (17%)(4)
False7 (30%)(7)
Pants on Fire4 (17%)(4)
Republican from Texas
Ted Cruz, elected to the U.S. Senate in November 2012, is the former solicitor general for the state of Texas, previously serving as the director of the Office of Policy Planning at the Federal Trade Commission, an Associate Deputy Attorney General at the U.S. Department of Justice, and as a domestic policy advisor on the 2000 Bush-Cheney campaign, according to his campaign biography.

Recent statements involving Ted Cruz
Ted Cruz

Quote:

"Every month, we get the reports from the Bureau of Labor Statistics that say even more people have given up looking for work."

FACT: Mostly False

"A strong bipartisan majority" in the House of Representatives "voted to defund Obamacare."

UPS left 15,000 employees’ spouses "without health insurance" and told them to, "go on an exchange with no employer subsidy."

"According to a recent Congressional Budget Office report, under Obamacare, 7 million people will lose their employer-sponsored insurance."

New York Times says UK tried to get it to hand over Snowden documents
Jill Abramson says she was approached by UK embassy officials after announcing collaboration with Guardian over NSA files

The editor of the New York Times, Jill Abramson, has confirmed that senior British officials attempted to persuade her to hand over secret documents leaked by the former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden.

Giving the newspaper's first official comments on the incident, Abramson said that she was approached by the UK embassy in Washington after it was announced that the New York Times was collaborating with the Guardian to explore some of the files disclosed by Snowden. Among the files are several relating to the activities of GCHQ, the agency responsible for signals interception in the UK.

"They were hopeful that we would relinquish any material that we might be reporting on, relating to Edward Snowden. Needless to say I considered what they told me, and said no," Abramson told the Guardian in an interview to mark the International Herald Tribune's relaunch as the International New York Times.

The incident shows the lengths to which the UK government has gone to try to discourage press coverage of the Snowden leaks. In July, the government threatened to take legal action against the Guardian that could have prevented publication, culminating in the destruction of computer hard drives containing some of Snowden's files.

... ... ...

I really wonder, if Frank supports such as well:

Quote:

New York Times says UK tried to get it to hand over Snowden documents
Jill Abramson says she was approached by UK embassy officials after announcing collaboration with Guardian over NSA files

The editor of the New York Times, Jill Abramson, has confirmed that senior British officials attempted to persuade her to hand over secret documents leaked by the former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden.

Giving the newspaper's first official comments on the incident, Abramson said that she was approached by the UK embassy in Washington after it was announced that the New York Times was collaborating with the Guardian to explore some of the files disclosed by Snowden. Among the files are several relating to the activities of GCHQ, the agency responsible for signals interception in the UK.

"They were hopeful that we would relinquish any material that we might be reporting on, relating to Edward Snowden. Needless to say I considered what they told me, and said no," Abramson told the Guardian in an interview to mark the International Herald Tribune's relaunch as the International New York Times.

The incident shows the lengths to which the UK government has gone to try to discourage press coverage of the Snowden leaks. In July, the government threatened to take legal action against the Guardian that could have prevented publication, culminating in the destruction of computer hard drives containing some of Snowden's files.

... ... ...

Snowden has been accused of breaking some serious laws in the United States. I definitely support his right to a fair trial--and I definitely support the right of the United States to bring him to trial.