42
   

Snowdon is a dummy

 
 
JPB
 
  1  
Sat 12 Oct, 2013 07:03 am
I strongly support this effort.

Quote:
The conservative Republican who co-authored America's Patriot Act is preparing to unveil bipartisan legislation that would dramatically curtail the domestic surveillance powers it gives to intelligence agencies.

Congressman Jim Sensenbrenner, who worked with president George W Bush to give more power to US intelligence agencies after the September 11 terrorist attacks, said the intelligence community had misused those powers by collecting telephone records on all Americans, and claimed it was time "to put their metadata program out of business".

His imminent bill in the House of Representatives is expected to be matched by a similar proposal from Senate judiciary committee chair Patrick Leahy, a Democrat. It pulls together existing congressional efforts to reform the National Security Agency in the wake of disclosures by whistleblower Edward Snowden.

Sensenbrenner has called his bill the Uniting and Strengthening America by Fulfilling Rights and Ending Eavesdropping, Dragnet-Collection, and Online Monitoring Act – or USA Freedom Act, and a draft seen by the Guardian has four broad aims.

It seeks to limit the collection of phone records to known terrorist suspects; to end "secret laws" by making courts disclose surveillance policies; to create a special court advocate to represent privacy interests; and to allow companies to disclose how many requests for users' information they receive from the USA. The bill also tightens up language governing overseas surveillance to remove a loophole which it has been abused to target internet and email activities of Americans.

More
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Sat 12 Oct, 2013 07:06 am
@JPB,
JPB wrote:

I strongly support this effort.

Quote:
The conservative Republican who co-authored America's Patriot Act is preparing to unveil bipartisan legislation that would dramatically curtail the domestic surveillance powers it gives to intelligence agencies.

Congressman Jim Sensenbrenner, who worked with president George W Bush to give more power to US intelligence agencies after the September 11 terrorist attacks, said the intelligence community had misused those powers by collecting telephone records on all Americans, and claimed it was time "to put their metadata program out of business".

His imminent bill in the House of Representatives is expected to be matched by a similar proposal from Senate judiciary committee chair Patrick Leahy, a Democrat. It pulls together existing congressional efforts to reform the National Security Agency in the wake of disclosures by whistleblower Edward Snowden.

Sensenbrenner has called his bill the Uniting and Strengthening America by Fulfilling Rights and Ending Eavesdropping, Dragnet-Collection, and Online Monitoring Act – or USA Freedom Act, and a draft seen by the Guardian has four broad aims.

It seeks to limit the collection of phone records to known terrorist suspects; to end "secret laws" by making courts disclose surveillance policies; to create a special court advocate to represent privacy interests; and to allow companies to disclose how many requests for users' information they receive from the USA. The bill also tightens up language governing overseas surveillance to remove a loophole which it has been abused to target internet and email activities of Americans.

More



I suggest, JPB, that you, Congressman Sensenbrenner, and Senator Leahy be careful of what you wish for.
0 Replies
 
JPB
 
  3  
Sat 12 Oct, 2013 07:11 am
I'm always careful in what I wish for, Frank. I wish for a government who actually follows the law and doesn't reinterpret it to it's own self interest. This metadata collection has been going on for years now at the cost of billions of dollars per year and didn't prevent one, not one, attack.

And the FISA court will continue to rubber stamp the process until it's prevented from doing so by law.
Quote:
Of course, in the last three months, we've also learned that this program of collecting data on every phone call in the US has been necessary to stop precisely zero attacks in the US -- but it did apparently lead them to a taxi driver sending some money to some not very nice people in Somalia. And, because of that, the NSA gets to keep track of everyone's phone calls. As has been explained repeatedly, this seems to go against not just the spirit and intended purpose of the 4th Amendment, but the plain language of that same Amendment. But, the FISA court has earned its rubber stamp reputation for a reason, and apparently it's not about to give up on it. Techdirt.
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Sat 12 Oct, 2013 07:17 am
@JPB,
JPB wrote:

I'm always careful in what I wish for, Frank. I wish for a government who actually follows the law and doesn't reinterpret it to it's own self interest. This metadata collection has been going on for years now at the cost of billions of dollars per year and didn't prevent one, not one, attack.


I question whether you, or anyone else involved here, can accurately report that it did not prevent even one attack.

Quote:

And the FISA court will continue to rubber stamp the process until it's prevented from doing so by law.


Yes, it will...and perhaps to our direct advantage.

It may be preventing all sorts of things that rightly must be prevented.


Quote:
Of course, in the last three months, we've also learned that this program of collecting data on every phone call in the US has been necessary to stop precisely zero attacks in the US -- but it did apparently lead them to a taxi driver sending some money to some not very nice people in Somalia. And, because of that, the NSA gets to keep track of everyone's phone calls. As has been explained repeatedly, this seems to go against not just the spirit and intended purpose of the 4th Amendment, but the plain language of that same Amendment. But, the FISA court has earned its rubber stamp reputation for a reason, and apparently it's not about to give up on it. Techdirt.



I understand your consternation and concerns...but I reiterate:

Be careful what you wish for. What comes as a result may be much, much worse than what now is.
Walter Hinteler
 
  4  
Sat 12 Oct, 2013 07:19 am
@Frank Apisa,
Frank Apisa wrote:
I question whether you, or anyone else involved here, can accurately report that it did not prevent even one attack.
No. And no-one else did, too .... besides making some mystic remarks ...
Walter Hinteler
 
  2  
Sat 12 Oct, 2013 07:21 am
@Frank Apisa,
Frank Apisa wrote:
Yes, it will...and perhaps to our direct advantage.

It may be preventing all sorts of things that rightly must be prevented.
We don't have and can't have secret courts here. Perhaps that disqualifies me to answer, but ... if something "rightly" (sic!) is prevented, I really have no problems with it.
0 Replies
 
JPB
 
  3  
Sat 12 Oct, 2013 08:11 am
@Walter Hinteler,
Right. Metadata collection "contributed" to preventing "some" of the plots on US soil, but has not been identified as preventing a single one that wouldn't have otherwise been prevented through legal (really legal) means.
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Sat 12 Oct, 2013 09:12 am
@JPB,
JPB wrote:

Right. Metadata collection "contributed" to preventing "some" of the plots on US soil, but has not been identified as preventing a single one that wouldn't have otherwise been prevented through legal (really legal) means.


JPB...I am not trying to give you a hard time here...and I repeat that I understand your discomfort with some of this stuff.

But there is absolutely no way I can image that ANYONE can authoritatively say that the procedure has not prevented a single event that wouldn't have been prevented through other "really legal" means.

It may not have been "identified" as you mentioned...but that most assuredly does not mean it has not happened...MANY TIMES.

I stand by my admonition for everyone to be very careful of what you hope for. We may preserve our "privacy"...at a cost to our freedom.

Walter Hinteler
 
  3  
Sat 12 Oct, 2013 09:21 am
@Frank Apisa,
My privacy is part of my freedom.

Perhaps, Frank, others outside Germany think differently. But we've lost that freedom too often ... with very unfortunate results, not only for us but for others and the world as well.
0 Replies
 
JPB
 
  3  
Sat 12 Oct, 2013 09:27 am
@Frank Apisa,
All "benefits" have costs. You may feel that we're receiving a reasonable benefit for the cost, but I don't. The cost both in terms of privacy lost and tax dollars spent far outweighs whatever benefit this program theoretically provides. The fact that the authors of the Patriot Act under which all of this "creative" spying and invasion is occurring are the ones pushing for it's repeal speaks volumes. There have been hearings this week on the NSA program. The intelligence community is begging to be able to keep their space ships and toys/tools, but they have provided no data that justifies it.

I don't know what your tax burden is Frank. As a retiree you may not have one. Mine is substantial and I care a great deal on how it is spent.
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Sat 12 Oct, 2013 09:29 am
I think I've pretty much said what I want to say for now.

We'll see how things work out.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  3  
Sat 12 Oct, 2013 09:49 am
@JPB,
I agree; the idea that our government is breaking the laws of the land is not something we should take lightly. It's about our Constitutional Rights. We have already learned that what they've been saying are lies. Our government started wars on lies.

If the citizens allows them to continue on this path, where does it end?

0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Sat 12 Oct, 2013 10:11 am
Maybe there is something else to be said on the other side of the ledger.

As most of you know, I am a golfer…I love the game.

Now…some golfers (I am one of them) play by the rules. Others feel it is okay to “turn the ball over”; to pick up three foot putts as “gimme’s.”; that it is okay to kick a ball out from behind a bush or a tree; or to change a “fried egg” into a teed up shot in a bunker.

The latter group almost always come in with very low scores.

They “win.”

Those of us who stick to the rules often pat ourselves on the back and talk about moral victories (sometimes as we shell out bucks having lost a Nassau.)

My point is if the game of life…is going to be played…and we are going to stick to “rules”…and sworn enemies are going to laugh at them…well…

…we are going to lose.

Oh, we are going to congratulate ourselves on sticking to the rules…on keeping our “privacy.” But “they” are going to win. And it won’t be just a few bucks we will be forking over like in a friendly Nassau.

As has been noted by people much smarter than most here…our Constitution was never intended to be a suicide pact. Keeping all our privacy in today’s day and age may seem too important to compromise…but the cost can be devastating.

Undoubtedly there are terrorists out there as anxious as any of our libertarian leaning citizens…to see the right to privacy prevail over the (perhaps necessary) need of government to be rather intrusive.

You folk may be right...and I may be dead wrong. But when it comes to the need to be alert because our enemies are determined...I am more than willing to give up damn near all of my "privacy."

Like I said...I may be dead wrong. But one of the freedoms I have...and which I wish to exercise...is to give up my so-called right to privacy. I hope more Americans join me...until we become a majority.

In the meantime, we will see laws enacted to limit our intelligence services...and with each limitation, more opportunities for attack will become available. When the next attack comes (it will come whether we enact new laws or not)...the people who will be bemoaning the deficiencies in intelligence may very well be the same people decrying what they are doing right now...and lobbying for greater restrictions.
BillRM
 
  3  
Sat 12 Oct, 2013 10:25 am
@Frank Apisa,
The government is the one in breaking the rules, in fact the very damn charter of the US as a matter of fact.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Sat 12 Oct, 2013 10:47 am
@Frank Apisa,
Someone else must have read your response(s), Frank Wink

It's just in the news that Telekom ("t-online") will offer data-traffic (for emails etc), bypassing PoP's and servers in the USA and the UK ... ... ... which actually is just an addition to the already existing "e-mail made in Germany"-programs by most internet providers here.
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Sat 12 Oct, 2013 11:08 am
@Walter Hinteler,
Walter Hinteler wrote:

Someone else must have read your response(s), Frank Wink

It's just in the news that Telekom ("t-online") will offer data-traffic (for emails etc), bypassing PoP's and servers in the USA and the UK ... ... ... which actually is just an addition to the already existing "e-mail made in Germany"-programs by most internet providers here.


I guess some people will go to those lengths, Walter. And that is their right. I do not begrudge them in any way...and I see their viewpoint a good deal more clearly than is apparent to some.

But I am willing to share every email I send and receive with the government...and with anyone else who cares.

If anyone truly is that interested in what I say in emails...hack me. I have very few safeguards...and none of the more sophisticated ones.
BillRM
 
  2  
Sat 12 Oct, 2013 11:36 am
@Frank Apisa,
Quote:
But I am willing to share every email I send and receive with the government...and with anyone else who cares.


Whether you would allow your privacy to be invaded at whim or not is completely beside the point as far as the rest of us not having that done to us.

It is a deal breaker when the government does no honor the constitution and you can not follow the constitution in one aspect without endangering and making meaningless the whole document as it mean that our rulers can ignore any clause at their whim.
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Sat 12 Oct, 2013 11:48 am
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:

Quote:
But I am willing to share every email I send and receive with the government...and with anyone else who cares.


Whether you would allow your privacy to be invaded at whim or not is completely beside the point as far as the rest of us not having that done to us.

It is a deal breaker when the government does no honor the constitution and you can not follow the constitution in one aspect without endangering and making meaningless the whole document as it mean that our rulers can ignore any clause at their whim.


Bill...try to stay under control. I am saying what I feel for myself...and that most assuredly is not "besides the point."

You seem to be suggesting that I am not free to disagree with you on this issue. And your arguments are faulty. You are not the final arbiter of what does and does not "respect" the Constitution. The courts are. And so far, the courts are not impressed with your assertions.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  2  
Sat 12 Oct, 2013 12:39 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Quote:
Deutsche Telekom is pushing to shield Internet traffic from spies by routing it through German servers. Outrage followed revelations that US surveillance programs had accessed the private messages of German citizens.

Telekom had already announced that it would channel local email traffic through servers within Germany, but the push for cooperation with competitors represents a new element. The company aims to reach an agreement with other Internet providers that any data transmitted domestically would not leave German borders, said Thomas Kremer, a member of Bonn-based Telekom's board of management for data privacy, legal affairs and compliance.

"In a next step, this initiative could be expanded to the Schengen area," Kremer said, referring to the 26 EU countries - excluding Britain - that have abandoned controls on land borders.
[...]
... Government snooping remains a sensitive subject in Germany, after decades of heavy surveillance of citizens in the former East and years of it nationwide under Hitler's Nazis.

"We want to guarantee that no byte between senders and recipients within Germany will even temporarily cross the border," Kremer said.
[...]
The magazine WirtschaftsWoche reported that companies such as Vodafone and Telefonica would consider whether to join the plan by Germany's biggest Internet provider.
Source
0 Replies
 
JPB
 
  3  
Sat 12 Oct, 2013 01:05 pm
@Frank Apisa,
When I am the sworn adversary of my government (which they've explicitly stated in some of the PRISM documents about all of us) and we're the ones paying the bill, both for the cost of their program and they salaries/lifestyle, then it's no game. Especially when they have the keys to the jailhouse on their side.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Snowdon is a dummy
  3. » Page 127
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.09 seconds on 07/18/2025 at 12:33:08