63
   

What are your pet peeves re English usage?

 
 
booman2
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 May, 2005 09:59 pm
Pifka,
.....In African-American culture, we men know that Our best tool of survival is our, "mother wit."
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 May, 2005 10:51 pm
While we exercise our mother tongue.

Piffka, you should be thankful you can dissociate yourself from "man's inhumanity to man". Smile
0 Replies
 
Piffka
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 May, 2005 11:44 pm
booman2 wrote:
Pifka,
.....In African-American culture, we men know that Our best tool of survival is our, "mother wit."


Thanks, Booman. That's nice. I'll try to remember it. I'm sure you have loads of this, too. Is it the same as common sense... or different?

And, McT -- Mother tongue, of course.

I didn't mean to get worked up about this though when it comes up I see no need to sidetrack. <shrug> It's just a peeve o'mine.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 May, 2005 11:46 pm
How dare you be peeved, Miss Flyer, what do you think this is . . . uh, i mean . . . uh . . . never mind . . .
0 Replies
 
Piffka
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 May, 2005 11:56 pm
Setanta, you are a gentleman and a scholar... and very funny, too. <smooch>
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 May, 2005 11:57 pm
Ooooooooooo . . . smooches ! ! !
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Wed 1 Jun, 2005 12:32 am
We could dabble in some deeper waters...of which I know and understand little...but weren't most pre-christian religions centered round a Mother Earth or a Gaia-type goddess (celtic? and others) and it was the Christians who introduced the father figure to certre stage? Or maybe before them, the Old Testament hebrews.

Shades of The Da Vinci Code. Is the early Bible to blame for all this PC resentment?
0 Replies
 
Clary
 
  1  
Reply Wed 1 Jun, 2005 12:44 am
http://witcombe.sbc.edu/willendorf/images/willendorfa.jpg
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 1 Jun, 2005 12:46 am
I think that one can definitely demonstrate that the position of women suffered in northern and western European cultures from the introduction of eastern mediterranean values, such as those of the Romans and Greeks, and then more crucially, from the introduction of the extremely bigoted and misogynistic views of the Judeo-Christian tradition. I also consider that the problem simply grew worse with the Protestant Reformation.
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Wed 1 Jun, 2005 12:51 am
Setanta wrote:
How dare you be peeved, Miss Flyer, what do you think this is . . . uh, i mean . . . uh . . . never mind . . .


Rumors of this thread's death have been greatly exaggerated, desu ne? Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 1 Jun, 2005 12:53 am
As most people here have had the good sense to ignore your antics and tantrums, it does indeed survive . . .
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Wed 1 Jun, 2005 01:11 am
Setanta wrote:
I find it hilarious that English-speakers refer to languages that lack a neuter as being "sexist," and this was often alleged in the late 1960's and early 1970's by feminists. In french, sein, which means breast, is masculine; barbre, which means beard, is feminine. There are lots and lots of examples in which there is no "intuitive" connection between an object and the gender of the noun which describes it.


Set,

You're confusing the grammatical term 'gender' with the everyday use of 'gender'. In the study of language, 'gender' only means 'kind'.

Quote:

M-W online:
gender
1 a : a subclass within a grammatical class (as noun, pronoun, adjective, or verb) of a language that is partly arbitrary but also partly based on distinguishable characteristics (as shape, social rank, manner of existence, or sex) and that determines agreement with and selection of other words or grammatical forms


Quote:
S Pinker: The Language Instinct
It just happens that in many European languages the genders correspond to the sexes, at least in pronouns. For this reason the linguistic term gender has been pressed into service by nonlinguists as a convenient label for sexual dimorphism; the more accurate term sex seems now to be reserved as a polite way to refer to copulation.
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Wed 1 Jun, 2005 02:31 am
I thought copulation was a polite way to refer to sex. :wink:
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Wed 1 Jun, 2005 02:51 am
McTag wrote:
I thought copulation was a polite way to refer to sex. :wink:


What's in a name? A rose by any other name would still sound as good. Very Happy
0 Replies
 
Merry Andrew
 
  1  
Reply Wed 1 Jun, 2005 03:08 am
I do sympathize with your peeve re: sexism in the language, Piff. However, I believe this is an emotional, rather than linguistic, peeve. When Alexander Pope said, "The proper study of mankind is man," I really don't think he meant to exclude womanhood.
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Wed 1 Jun, 2005 05:17 am
Plainly not. It's their favourite pastime.

"Women. Can't live with them, can't live without them, can't refer to them in speech without unnecessary tautology or accusations of unreconstructed sexism." Smile
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Reply Wed 1 Jun, 2005 06:16 am
Beware, McTag - you're on thin ice. :wink:
0 Replies
 
Virago
 
  1  
Reply Wed 1 Jun, 2005 07:07 am
We've shifted from the science of language to the psychology of it. Wheee! Smile

Peeves are personal things, I think, and not meant to be universal. I'm not bothered by "brotherhood" or even by "he" used when "she" could also be appropriate. If it applies to me I figure I'm in there somewhere. I think that an object being referred to as "she" probably does have a little something to do with the temperament of the thing, and a man's perception of it. It's a man thing, generally speaking, to refer to cars or motorcycles or ships as "she", especially if they require something specific to run well. Women don't, as a rule, speak that way. We say "it".

I think it's as likely as anything that men attribute a female personality to things because there seems to be no reason for the particular "behavior" of the object. Just like there seems to be no reason for a woman to say, "Fine. Go ahead." when what she really means is "if you do it you will pay for it for the rest of your life." It's a basic difference in men and women. Men just want to hunt and gather; they don't really want to talk about how they feel about hunting and gathering, and so are confounded by women who can talk for three hours about a a five minute incident. Men want to say "meat good". Women want to tell you what meat is good, why they like it, how they feel about liking it, how they came to like it, and how it affects other things in their life. And the man, who thinks he said all that with "meat good" stands bewildered. So, the motorcycle that runs with specific attention becomes a "she". :wink:

Virago
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 1 Jun, 2005 07:39 am
In that case, the expression "beating a dead horse" must have been coined by a married man . . .
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Wed 1 Jun, 2005 08:12 am
Merry Andrew wrote:
IWhen Alexander Pope said, "The proper study of mankind is man," I really don't think he meant to exclude womanhood.


I suppose, it was different, when Pope Alexander said such.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

deal - Question by WBYeats
Let pupils abandon spelling rules, says academic - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Please, I need help. - Question by imsak
Is this sentence grammatically correct? - Question by Sydney-Strock
"come from" - Question by mcook
concentrated - Question by WBYeats
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 03/13/2025 at 11:43:25