We've shifted from the science of language to the psychology of it. Wheee!
Peeves are personal things, I think, and not meant to be universal. I'm not bothered by "brotherhood" or even by "he" used when "she" could also be appropriate. If it applies to me I figure I'm in there somewhere. I think that an object being referred to as "she" probably does have a little something to do with the temperament of the thing, and a man's perception of it. It's a man thing, generally speaking, to refer to cars or motorcycles or ships as "she", especially if they require something specific to run well. Women don't, as a rule, speak that way. We say "it".
I think it's as likely as anything that men attribute a female personality to things because there seems to be no reason for the particular "behavior" of the object. Just like there seems to be no reason for a woman to say, "Fine. Go ahead." when what she really means is "if you do it you will pay for it for the rest of your life." It's a basic difference in men and women. Men just want to hunt and gather; they don't really want to talk about how they
feel about hunting and gathering, and so are confounded by women who can talk for three hours about a a five minute incident. Men want to say "meat good". Women want to tell you what meat is good, why they like it, how they feel about liking it, how they came to like it, and how it affects other things in their life. And the man, who thinks he said all that with "meat good" stands bewildered. So, the motorcycle that runs with specific attention becomes a "she". :wink:
Virago