63
   

What are your pet peeves re English usage?

Forums: English, Grammar, Abusage, Pet Peeves, English Usage
Email this Topic • Print this Page
 
 
Merry Andrew
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Apr, 2007 06:34 am
Ahhh...sorry, I misunderstood the thrust of your post. Mea culpa.
0 Replies
 
Roberta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Apr, 2007 06:44 am
All is forgiven, Andy.

I was jumping in to what had preceded. Idiotic language usage in news reporting.
0 Replies
 
Merry Andrew
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Apr, 2007 09:04 am
Well...'Breaking news' is an old and accepted piece of journalistic jargon. It's used to mean that a brand new story, something that just came to light or is happening even as we speak, is coming in. It pre-dates TV reporting by at least a couple of decades or more. Used to be heard only in newsrooms. Now it's in the public domain.
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Apr, 2007 09:55 am
Roberta wrote:
I'm about hyped out. 24/7 news is too much. I knew it was time to turn off the tv when I saw:

BREAKING NEWS:

Authorities have not yet revealed the identity of the shooter.


In the very early days of BBC news broadcasts, I believe they once reported "There is no news today".

Wouldn't that be a refreshing change?

Another time, a newspaper- possibly of the same vintage- had a Stop Press report: "Fog in Channel. Europe cut off"
0 Replies
 
Clary
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Apr, 2007 12:16 pm
I agree, isn't it funny how the news always exactly fits the slot made for it?
0 Replies
 
Mame
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Apr, 2007 02:36 pm
Speaking of news, isn't it funny when newscasters have to ad-lib and just repeat themselves?
0 Replies
 
Merry Andrew
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Apr, 2007 04:12 pm
McTag wrote:

In the very early days of BBC news broadcasts, I believe they once reported "There is no news today".

Wouldn't that be a refreshing change.


In the interests of proper grammar, shouldn't that be "There are no news today"? Smile Smile Smile
0 Replies
 
Roberta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Apr, 2007 05:52 pm
Merry Andrew wrote:
Well...'Breaking news' is an old and accepted piece of journalistic jargon. It's used to mean that a brand new story, something that just came to light or is happening even as we speak, is coming in. It pre-dates TV reporting by at least a couple of decades or more. Used to be heard only in newsrooms. Now it's in the public domain.



That's what I understood breaking news to mean. The report presented as breaking news was the same report that had been reported all day. Not breaking news. Worse still that what they were saying was that they didn't have anything to report.
0 Replies
 
Merry Andrew
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Apr, 2007 09:50 pm
Know whatcha mean, 'Boita. They'll break the same news over and over again all day, hoping no one will notice. It's even more annoying when they run the exact same video or audio clip they ran just half an hour ago.
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Apr, 2007 02:55 am
Merry Andrew wrote:
McTag wrote:

In the very early days of BBC news broadcasts, I believe they once reported "There is no news today".

Wouldn't that be a refreshing change.


In the interests of proper grammar, shouldn't that be "There are no news today"? Smile Smile Smile


I think not. News is singular in this neck of the woods at least.

BBC announcers used to wear evening dress to read the news, yes even in the radio days:

"Here is the news, and this is Alvar Liddell reading it." A byegone age.
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Apr, 2007 04:12 am
News is singular, but newses are not.
0 Replies
 
Roberta
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Apr, 2007 04:18 am
What about newsi?
0 Replies
 
Joe Nation
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Apr, 2007 04:37 am
Newsie is a noun and it"s singular.

Joe(because they can't get dates)Nation
0 Replies
 
Roberta
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Apr, 2007 04:42 am
Joe, Newsie is a noun? I thought it was an adjective. Or is it the feminine version of the plural noun newsi?
0 Replies
 
Merry Andrew
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Apr, 2007 05:49 am
I'm sorry I started this. My bad.
0 Replies
 
Roberta
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Apr, 2007 05:59 am
Okay, kid. I'm changing the subject. I heard someone in an interview last night refer to mental insanity.
0 Replies
 
Merry Andrew
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Apr, 2007 06:01 am
Roberta wrote:
Okay, kid. I'm changing the subject. I heard someone in an interview last night refer to mental insanity.


As opposed to. . .?


[Someone once said, "You came here under false pretenses." The other man answered, "What other kind are there?"]
0 Replies
 
Roberta
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Apr, 2007 06:03 am
That's what I was wondering, Andy.
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Apr, 2007 07:05 am
Yes, mental insanity. When I was a lad, invalids used to be conveyed to hospital in an ambulance. If you were bad, you were driven there. If you could walk, you walked or went on the bus.

Now they have things called "emergency ambulances". WTF? If it ain't broke, I say don't fix it.
0 Replies
 
Clary
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Apr, 2007 09:54 am
Speaking of tautology, survival of the fittest means survival of those who survive.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

deal - Question by WBYeats
Expert help needed: pronoun form following main verb before a gerund - Question by adavis444
Let pupils abandon spelling rules, says academic - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Please, I need help. - Question by imsak
Do you understand what "Transition overground" means? - Question by Alexander7
Is this sentence grammatically correct? - Question by Sydney-Strock
"come from" - Question by mcook
Is this paragraph incomprehensible? Would you suggest an edit? - Question by tamara123454
Does this sentence make any sense in English? - Question by estherara
Could someone review my assignment? - Question by kair0s
concentrated - Question by WBYeats
 
  1. Forums
  2. » What are your pet peeves re English usage?
  3. » Page 183
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.09 seconds on 02/05/2025 at 10:49:19
▲ ▼