63
   

What are your pet peeves re English usage?

 
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 May, 2006 06:38 am
Setanta wrote:
That would not be a "peeve," however, with the English language.


Following me around again? Fair warning - I have gas today.

I think if you reread the thread title it clearly states "English Usage".
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 May, 2006 07:32 am
McTag wrote:
dlowan wrote:
Yes, damn your black, pedantic heart!!!!


My heart is light, airy, cheerful and happy.

And if I can help anyone else as I stroll along life's highway..... :wink:



Laughing
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 May, 2006 07:43 am
cjhsa wrote:
Setanta wrote:
That would not be a "peeve," however, with the English language.


Following me around again? Fair warning - I have gas today.

I think if you reread the thread title it clearly states "English Usage".


But they are not USING English.


I thought that that, for some odd and impenetrable reason, was your peeve.
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 May, 2006 07:49 am
What is odd and unpenetrable about English being the unofficial official language of the U.S.?

You think you're so smart and take such delight in twisting other people's words, it makes me sick.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 May, 2006 07:51 am
cjhsa wrote:
Setanta wrote:
That would not be a "peeve," however, with the English language.


Following me around again? Fair warning - I have gas today.

I think if you reread the thread title it clearly states "English Usage".


That sounds like something a paranoid freak would say--i've been posting to this thread literally for years--get over your silly self.
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 May, 2006 07:57 am
If you were the author then I might find your argument compelling, but you're not, and I don't.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 May, 2006 07:58 am
cjhsa wrote:
What is odd and unpenetrable about English being the unofficial official language of the U.S.?

You think you're so smart and take such delight in twisting other people's words, it makes me sick.


Not a long journey for you.

And, what has the official language of your country got to do with people translating stuff?
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 May, 2006 08:01 am
We have no official langauge. We do, however, have lots and lots of hateful paranoids.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 May, 2006 08:12 am
Setanta wrote:
We have no official langauge. We do, however, have lots and lots of hateful paranoids.


Ah, they infest humanity as fleas do a dog.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 May, 2006 08:15 am
Or a rabbit . . .
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 May, 2006 08:20 am
The vermin and varmints here reveal themselves through their avatars.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 May, 2006 08:21 am
Setanta wrote:
Or a rabbit . . .



Don't be ridiculous.

We shower daily.


At least.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 May, 2006 08:22 am
cjhsa wrote:
The vermin and varmints here reveal themselves through their avatars.




So, you really are a driverless machine running amok, then?
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 May, 2006 08:23 am
Now, stoppit!!

And

No-one has answered my question nor responded to my last brilliant joke.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 May, 2006 08:24 am
McTag wrote:
Now, stoppit!!

And

No-one has answered my question nor responded to my last brilliant joke.


Where is it?
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 May, 2006 09:12 am
McTag wrote:
To say a phrase like "the old lamplighter" without uttering "thee" is to require a glottal stop. This has nothing to do with emphasis. It's simply easier.


I don't know if this was directed to me, McTag, but of course there is more than one reason we choose 'thee' over 'the' and verse visa. Smile
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 May, 2006 09:22 am
Setanta wrote:
That sounds like something a paranoid freak would say--i've been posting to this thread literally for years--get over your silly self.


So would it be fair to say that rumors of the death of this thread have been greatly exaggerated? Smile
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 May, 2006 10:56 am
JTT wrote:
McTag wrote:
To say a phrase like "the old lamplighter" without uttering "thee" is to require a glottal stop. This has nothing to do with emphasis. It's simply easier.


I don't know if this was directed to me, McTag, but of course there is more than one reason we choose 'thee' over 'the' and verse visa. Smile


No, it was following on from something Andrew wrote.

What are the reasons for choosing an appropriate pronunciation of 'the'?
I know only two; or three, if you include rhetorical emphasis.
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Wed 3 May, 2006 08:46 am
McTag wrote:


No, it was following on from something Andrew wrote.

What are the reasons for choosing an appropriate pronunciation of 'the'?
I know only two; or three, if you include rhetorical emphasis.


Sorry for the intrusion then, McTag. I'd say that there are a number of reasons. One example, I suppose, could be 'thee' used as an affectation.

Language speaks to the infinite. It has to do whatever a speaker wants it to do at a particular moment, for a particular situation.
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Fri 12 May, 2006 06:53 pm
I heard a good one last weekend: "Sort of speak" instead of "So to speak".
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

deal - Question by WBYeats
Let pupils abandon spelling rules, says academic - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Please, I need help. - Question by imsak
Is this sentence grammatically correct? - Question by Sydney-Strock
"come from" - Question by mcook
concentrated - Question by WBYeats
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 10/02/2024 at 12:33:45