@neologist,
neologist wrote:
RexRed wrote:No one can deny sex is at the very essence of love.
I've known you to be a man of empathy, Rex. That is a quality of principled love. How can sex be the essence of the love you would show to a homeless amputee, for example?
For most of my life I have had my ideas of love and sex defined by religion.
The logical alternative is to define love and sex like the Greeks or perhaps Romans.
What if sex is actually defined best like the Hindus or some other "culture"? Once again we have Christians trying to tell the world that we obtained sexual morality in 2000 years... These are the same people who think the universe is 6000 years old. And we are going to listen to these same people on the origin of morality and what sexuality is?
I am just saying that maybe the "love" that two consenting adults share is a more sacred thing than the way religion portrays it. As I have said before that LGBT love it is a sacred rite.
American Indians had consideration for LGBT people in their ancient culture. I believe American Indians referred to LGBT people as "two spirits". See homosexuality existed before but European culture and religion was too puritanical. That is like saying there are no gays in Iran...
"Some" religions try and used demons to condemn same sex couples.
I think Neo you like to remind people of the "license to sin". I say the greatest sin is insulting the love of two consenting adults with bigotry, homophobia and intolerance. Holding this hate towards LGBT people for years deep inside one's being, what kind of demon is that? Is that love?
I see time and again religious people and over the years they do not seem to change, they just keep the same hate inside until it consumes them and all that they stand for. They will have to play out some sort of public display to fulfill their own abhorrent religious behavior.
Is this the license you speak of Neo?
What license has religion used to play out its own sin against LGBT people?