reasoning logic
 
  1  
Reply Sun 23 Jun, 2013 01:23 pm
@RexRed,
That was good and very different Rex, I think mixing up your work with very different music is good for your music in a artistic way.
0 Replies
 
dalehileman
 
  1  
Reply Sun 23 Jun, 2013 02:29 pm
@RexRed,
Quote:
Will particles interact millions of years from now with the universe expanding?
Interaction will become very rare as the particles approaching absolute zero mutually accelerate apart into the infinite void

Quote:
What will the purpose of life be then, "isolation"?
Rex you must be addressing an earlier phase than I

Quote:
Does life have meaning?
My intuition says emphatically yes since the one-time affair ending as above makes the Entire Megillah a single, quick, meaningless interaction of particles

Just how the physical constants came to be exactly the right value to permit evolution however, is a total mystery
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Sun 23 Jun, 2013 04:53 pm
@RexRed,
More specificity required, Rex. But if you are speaking of variations in the Gospel accounts, for example. each writer spoke from his own reference; variations would be expected in that case.
reasoning logic
 
  1  
Reply Sun 23 Jun, 2013 05:24 pm
@neologist,
Quote:
each writer spoke from his own reference; variations would be expected in that case.
What was it that they used as a reference? Dreams, psychosis?
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Sun 23 Jun, 2013 09:19 pm
@reasoning logic,
reasoning logic wrote:
Quote:
each writer spoke from his own reference; variations would be expected in that case.
What was it that they used as a reference? Dreams, psychosis?
Is there a logical argument here? Or just unsubstantiated name calling?
If you want to grade your own paper, RL. I can't prevent you. Just don't expect discourse.
count markovalley
 
  1  
Reply Mon 24 Jun, 2013 05:48 pm
Everything you state can be and has been refuted. human consciousness cannot be explained by any other conclusion other than it was ordered by purpose.
you can't define God .
FBM
 
  1  
Reply Mon 24 Jun, 2013 06:12 pm
@count markovalley,
I larfed. Laughing
0 Replies
 
reasoning logic
 
  1  
Reply Mon 24 Jun, 2013 06:48 pm
@neologist,
Quote:
If you want to grade your own paper, RL. I can't prevent you. Just don't expect discourse.


I have no interest other than the truth no matter how inconvenient it may be to me.
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Mon 24 Jun, 2013 11:11 pm
@reasoning logic,
reasoning logic wrote:
I have no interest other than the truth no matter how inconvenient it may be to me.
I am just swimmingly happy to hear you say that.
0 Replies
 
mark noble
 
  1  
Reply Wed 26 Jun, 2013 03:55 pm
I can define God.
An imaginary, omniscient, omnipotent and omnipresent force.

I prefer to call it 'Nature'

And we only exist in 'it' because 'it' exists in us.
dalehileman
 
  1  
Reply Wed 26 Jun, 2013 04:15 pm
@mark noble,
Great def Mark, right on. I wonder if you'd care to join the ranks of apodictical existential pantheists
mark noble
 
  1  
Reply Wed 26 Jun, 2013 04:20 pm
@dalehileman,
Only if I could rename it 'Apodictical Pantheistic existentialists'.
Or "A.P.Es" for short....?

Smile
dalehileman
 
  1  
Reply Wed 26 Jun, 2013 04:42 pm
@mark noble,
Quote:
Only if I could rename it 'Apodictical Pantheistic existentialists'.
Sure Mark, if you feel you might qualify you're free to use that word order
0 Replies
 
mark noble
 
  2  
Reply Wed 26 Jun, 2013 06:55 pm
Rex.
Particles, billions of years in the future, will become the hydrogen-based next relative big-bang.
But the universe will contract when its potential-fuel is exhausted, then it will collapse rapidly and re-ignite.

As for the meaning to life?
"To live"
"To absorb, expand, discharge"

Same as your particles Rex - Absorb, expand, discharge.............."To Live"
Everything lives!
dalehileman
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 Jun, 2013 10:39 am
@mark noble,
Quote:
But the universe will contract when its potential-fuel is exhausted, then it will collapse rapidly and re-ignite.
Yea Mark, given our present state of knowledge, that seems like the most obvious conclusion, easily dispatching so much contradiction and paradox surrounding the "God's single production "
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Jun, 2013 03:20 am
The Chariot
http://www.biddytarot.com/cards/chariot.jpg
http://www.biddytarot.com/tarot-card-meanings/major-arcana/chariot/
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Jun, 2013 03:37 am
~ ♥ ♥ ~

“Listen to your being. It is continuously giving you hints; it is a still, small voice. It does not shout at you, that is true. And if you are a little silent you will start feeling your way. Be the person you are…”

~ Osho ~

Image ~ Kausthub Desikachar

https://fbcdn-sphotos-f-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/6198_488543234558347_1271646306_n.jpg
dalehileman
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Jun, 2013 10:06 am
@RexRed,
Yea Rex, and another way of saying, "Listen to your Intuition"
0 Replies
 
dalehileman
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Jun, 2013 10:06 am
@RexRed,
Yea Rex, and another way of saying, "Listen to your Intuition"
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Jun, 2013 10:18 am
@mark noble,
If imaginary, how may it be called nature?
If omniscient, how may it be imaginary?
 

Related Topics

Another day when there is no God - Discussion by edgarblythe
Is "God" just our conscience? - Question by Groomers123
believe in god! - Question by roammer
The existence of God - Question by jwagner
Are Gods Judgments righteous? - Discussion by Smileyrius
What did God do on Day 8? - Question by HesDeltanCaptain
What do you think about world? - Question by Joona
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Does God Exist?
  3. » Page 6
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 05/06/2024 at 08:20:39