@Romeo Fabulini,
I floated something along those lines, Romeo, a few years ago on the Intelligent Design thread but not as forcefully as you have.
It was Ignored. Most of the powerhouse atheists have me on Ignore.
You came to mind yesterday when I read this ---
Quote:Of course, the part of enfant terrible guarantees to its performer a limited amusement. But to carry it off successfully requires an absence of that objective vision which the critic cultivates and prizes above all.
It was in Derek Stanford's book on Emily Bronte's stuff.
The gun nuts are extreme examples. Being an
enfant terrible is their only conversational gambit.