@FBM,
Quote:I think I'm pretty clear on it. You present peer-reviewed results of carefully controlled, double-blind experiments, allow others to try to replicate your results, and then go with what the data says. Neither you nor the author of the website you linked to have done that. So far, both of you have offered nothing but rhetoric. Not data. It seems that you and he both have trouble with the concept of what constitutes evidence. If you or he have any real evidence as described above, and which is the standard for researchers everywhere, please present it here. You've got experimental evidence or you've got nothing but empty words.
wow! You only trust "peer-reviewed results of carefully controlled, double-blind experiments" ????????????????
Based on WHAT??? I mean it, why do you trust that? why?
You learned that indoctrination school or indoctrination university???
Don't you want to think for yourself?? what?
Don't you see you are
believing too????
Yep, in "peer-reviewed results of carefully controlled, double-blind experiments"
You see, once someone wants to lie to you, they only have to write
"peer-reviewed results of carefully controlled, double-blind experiments"
And you are prepared to accept
NONSENSE!
Don't you really see that?
what a world.