0
   

What would the World be like if JESUS had never been Born?

 
 
Bibliophile the BibleGuru
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Dec, 2002 07:01 am
Today is the day that Christians all over the world celebrate the birth of Jesus Christ, but tell me, on what date was He REALLY born?
0 Replies
 
Monger
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Dec, 2002 08:07 am
Bibliophile the BibleGuru wrote:
Monger: you said, "Since the Bible doesn't mention the births of women, it's even possible that Adam & Eve had already given birth to one or more daughters before they ate the forbidden fruit."
Haven't you read ... Genesis 5:4, "And the days of Adam after he had begotten Seth were eight hundred years: and he begat sons and daughters:"


I'm rusty with the Bible and I'm sure I haven't read it as much as you, so it's great to have a BibleGuru to point things out--thanks. Very Happy
OK a more correct version would be: "When discussing children born to people in the Bible, neither the names of women born nor the years they were born in are mentioned, unlike with the men, and few women's births are mentioned in the first place." (There might be a couple odd exceptions to the name/year thing.)
Biblio, what are your thoughts on the idea that, according to the beloved story, it's entirely possible (if you forget about many churches' interpretation that sexual congress was the original sin) that Adam & Eve had children while in the garden of Eden, under the instruction of God to "be fruitful & multiply"?

EDIT: Biblio, the verse you quoted is only talking about Adam's daughters born after Seth, but the Bible story seems to indicate that Cain was married before Seth was born.
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Dec, 2002 10:46 am
I heard once monger. It was a secular date - I'll try Goggle!

"Today we know that Christ was not born on the 25th of December, but somewhere in March. December was chosen to coincide with the pagan Roman celebrations honouring Saturnus, the harvest god. The early Christians did not celebrate the birth of Christ - Christmas is not mentioned in the Bible. In 320AD, Pope Julius I specified December, 25th as Christ's date of birth. In 325AD, Constantine the Great officially introduced Christmas as an immovable feast. Still, in most countries Christmas was not a legal holiday until the 19th century."

He also was not borned in the year 0. What year was he borned?
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Dec, 2002 02:22 pm
In A.D. 349, Pope Julius formally selected December 25 as the day for Christmas. This date was already widely celebrated in the Roman world as citizens observed the Natalis Solis Invicti (the Birthday of the Inconquerable Sun) in honor of the sun god, Mithras. The festival took place just after the winter solstice, when the days become longer.

In 325AD, Constantine the Great, the first Christian Roman emperor, introduced Christmas as an immovable feast on 25 December. He also introduced Sunday as a holy day in a new 7-day week, and introduced movable feasts (Easter). In 354AD, Bishop Liberius of Rome officially ordered his members to celebrate the birth of Jesus on 25 December.

In Germanic countries (better: German speaking countries), December 25 became a church holiday in 813 and was recognized as legal holiday since 14th century.

The custom to celebrate Christmas Eve with the -today most important- tradition to give gifts, started in 17th and 18th century.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Dec, 2002 03:59 pm
Walter, Good info to share on this day. Thanks again. c.i.
0 Replies
 
Bibliophile the BibleGuru
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Dec, 2002 06:59 pm
Thanks for the info on 25 December celebration of Christ's birth.

Which year was it officially canonised? 325AD or 349AD?
0 Replies
 
Bibliophile the BibleGuru
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Dec, 2002 07:03 pm
Monger: you said, "Biblio, the verse you quoted is only talking about Adam's daughters born after Seth."

Not necessarily, my friend.
There is no clear chronological connection between the two portions of Genesis 5:4. The statement about Adam having had sons and daughters is a matter of historical fact, within the Genesis record, however, it is does not mean that the order in which it appears in the text is the order in which it ocurred chronologically.
0 Replies
 
Bibliophile the BibleGuru
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Dec, 2002 07:38 pm
Monger: you asked, "Biblio, what are your thoughts on the idea that, according to the beloved story, it's entirely possible (if you forget about many churches' interpretation that sexual congress was the original sin) that Adam & Eve had children while in the garden of Eden, under the instruction of God to "be fruitful & multiply"?"

In the absence of clear and unassailable evidence, I would say that it is possible, but more than likely improbable. :wink:
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Dec, 2002 07:43 pm
BG: are you saying that adam/eve where the first persons/humans on earth?
0 Replies
 
Bibliophile the BibleGuru
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Dec, 2002 07:45 pm
Dys: not I my friend, but the Bible says it!

Can you quote me a scripture that says something different or to the contrary?
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Dec, 2002 07:59 pm
BG" i grew up as a child in the middle east in the late '40's during the birth Israel but in a Muslim nation, i have seen the god of abraham up close and personal having been surrounded by Muslims, Jews and Christians, for modern "theologic minded" persons to sit in their upholstered chairs in their paneled rooms of intellectual discourse and ruminate over the musings of clerics that wrote about the sayings of a man, a rebel, a renegade, generations past his life, in diverse languages, from diverse cultures of the myths of centuries of folk lore and then to take it as a literal/factual document of history is a bit beyond my ken. no offence intended.
0 Replies
 
Bibliophile the BibleGuru
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Dec, 2002 08:02 pm
Dys: in the context of this topic and in response to your previous question, you may be interested to know that Jesus is referred to as the "LAST ADAM!"

See 1 Corinthians 15:45.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Dec, 2002 08:04 pm
yes i am familiar with the "first adam" "last adam"
0 Replies
 
Bibliophile the BibleGuru
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Dec, 2002 08:06 pm
Dys: I understand your views better than you might think!

I was brought up in an athiestic and humanistic home which had no time for "religion" of any description, and where the order of the day was "prove it to me from a naturalistic perspective, or else, everything you say is human invention, myth and fairy tale."
0 Replies
 
Bibliophile the BibleGuru
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Dec, 2002 08:08 pm
Dys: why did you ask the question about Adam and Eve being the first persons on the Earth?
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Dec, 2002 08:18 pm
just determining you "literalist" position
0 Replies
 
Debacle
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Dec, 2002 08:30 pm
Hello Bib, and Merry Christmas to one and all.

I would direct attention to the following verse from Luke:

"And there were in the same country shepherds abiding in the field, keeping watch over their flock by night."

I have read that in the hill country of Judea, the only time of year when the weather is suitable for keeping sheep in the field at night is the summer season. There doesn't appear to be any biblical mention of "a cold winter's night that was so deep" by which we traditionally regard the first noel in its climatological aspects. But then, sans scriptural comment, we have also developed the notion there were three maji.

This is a very lengthy and interesting discussion on numerous points, of which I have read every jot and tittle. Thanks very much, Bib.
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 Dec, 2002 12:21 pm
Shocked Even if he never existed now we know what he looked like.

From science and computers, a new face of Jesus
 
CNN) -- The Jesus pictured on the cover of this month's Popular Mechanics has a broad peasant's face, dark olive skin, short curly hair and a prominent nose. He would have stood 5-foot-1-inch tall and weighed 110 pounds, if the magazine is to be believed.


http://www.cnn.com/2002/TECH/science/12/25/face.jesus/index.html
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 Dec, 2002 01:47 pm
This picture would be much closer than the "Anglecanized" Hollywood image we are use to! I say this picture once before, somewhere else. It seems more National Geographic than Popular Mechanic - Ha!
0 Replies
 
husker
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 Dec, 2002 01:49 pm
The picture looks more like Russell Crowe than Mel Gobson. I heard Mel Gibson is going to play Jesus in a up coming movie.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.16 seconds on 01/10/2025 at 07:40:18