@Frank Apisa,
Quote:I appreciate the points you are making about how some of the prescriptive grammar rules help us in discussions of a more rigorous nature than just casual conversation. In my opinion, you are absolutely correct.
That's laughable, Frank, because those prescriptive grammar rules have never helped you. You can't point to any post of yours that would illustrate a rigorous discussion on your part. Your "discussions" on language and grammar are highly illustrative of just how badly your "prescriptive grammar rules" have failed you.
We know full well that you hold this opinion, but it's just that, an opinion, and a terribly uniformed one at that.
You avoid any discussions of a more rigorous nature. You brag about your standing in grammar and language and yet you cannot even discuss the same.
Quote:JTT uses prescriptive devises[sic] in his posts (the positioning of nouns and verbs…order of subjects and predicates)…so despite his protestations…well, you can finish that sentence yourself.
And you pretended to understand the concepts of prescriptivism and descriptivism, Frank. You swore up and down you understood them well enough to discuss the issues, which, of course, you never did.
Quote:My guess is that most people would never refer to those kinds of things as “falsehoods.” That designation is merely there so that JTT can call any use of prescriptive grammar (by others) “lying”…which, of course, is on done so he can call the person using the language liars.
Your "guess"??!! Of course it's your guess or your dismally informed opinion. The guy who was at the top of his class in language and grammar can't even discuss either.
Quote:As we go about our lives, we move in and out of many social groups, each associated with specific places and characteristic activities — school, work, family, shopping, worship, soccer and more. For each of us, this dense network of associations forms our society. Every detail of our selves and our lives — our appearance, speech, activities and associations — is perceived by others as an emblem of who we were, what we have become and where we fit in. The social profile of each person is recognizable and unique, like a fingerprint.
The ways we speak also reflect this combination of social similarity and diversity in fine detail. Our speech reflects national, regional, occupational and educational differences (among others)
Our language is both a tool for communication and a part of our personal image, like our physical appearance, behavior and belongings.
http://www.pbs.org/speak/speech/correct/gatekeeping/
But you already knew all this, Frank.You've been given this type of material more than once. Just as you avoid discussing these issues, you've likely avoided reading them or not which would illustrate just how much of a liar, a bald faced one, you really are. Which is it, Frank?