Earth to Msolga. Do you copy? Over!

First among these natural resources to fall under the American plan were the fur-bearing animals. The fur trade, of course, was not a matter of the first magnitude, and it is now (1923) a scarce-remembered episode of pioneering enterprise; nor does it now count in any appreciable degree among the useful means of livelihood, in great part because business enterprise has run through that range of natural resources with exemplary thoroughness and expedition and has left the place of it bare. It is worthwhile to speak of it here only because it shows a finished instance of business-as-usual converting community goods to private gain without afterthought. It is a neat, compact, and concluded chapter of American business enterprise.
Bound up with the enterprise there is also an unwritten chapter on the debauchery and manslaughter entailed on the Indian population of the country by the same businesslike fur trade; one of the least engaging chapters of colonial history, lapping over far into the nineteenth century, and leaving more than one distasteful sequel to run into the future. Indirectly and unintentionally, but speedily and conclusively, the traffic of the fur traders converted a reasonably peaceable and temperate native population to a state of fanatical hostility among themselves and an unmanageable complication of outlaws in their contact with the white population. The traffic has, of course, also had its effect on the latter, chiefly by way of what may be called sclerosis of the American soul.

General Douglas MacArthur encouraged the surrendered Japan to continue whaling in order to provide a cheap source of meat to starving people (and millions of dollars in oil for the USA and Europe). The Japanese whaling industry quickly recovered as MacArthur authorized two tankers, converted into factory ships (Hashidate Maru and Nisshin Maru), with whale catchers to once again take blue whales, fins, humpbacks and sperm whales in the Antarctic and elsewhere.

There is no moral high ground in these matters.

She might actually approve, a means whereby we'd correct Her terrible mistake

What destruction is that dale?

We are self-correcting and have redundancy to the nth dimension.

That is too ambiguous to risk commenting on.

There may not be a moral high ground for protecting whales,

"Rabbitiesis" was a way to restore a land that was overrun with rabbits

They were usully an action b well intentioned but stupid (usually) govt agents.

Whale killing will be leading to the extinction of a species that is perfectly adapted to its environment and the critical mass and environmental carrying capacity does NOT need harvesting by mans that are totlly bogus an artificlly justified.

but I can see over your head and your silly makeshift arguments

There is not the slightest chance of whales becoming extinct by man hunting them.

nd to claim that olgas clips were one sided. WHY NOT? The purpose of most of the "debators" that jumped in on that thread was to pile on her opinions. SO now you want her to abandon her arguments ? Why not just disappear spendi,?