@coldjoint,
Please, cj, you're making yourself look like an idiot.
No, more like this.
Quote:The objective of the intervention, as spelled out by Brezinski, was to trap the Soviets in a long and costly war designed to drain their resources, just as Vietnam had bled the United States. The high level of civilian casualties that this would certainly entail was considered but set aside.
According to one senior official, "The question here was whether it was morally acceptable that, in order to keep the Soviets off balance, which was the reason for the operation, it was permissible to use other lives for our geopolitical interests." Carter's CIA director Stansfield Turner answered the question: "I decided I could live with that."
According to Representative Charles Wilson, a Texas Democrat,
There were 58,000 dead in Vietnam and we owe the Russians one.... I have a slight obsession with it, because of Vietnam. I thought the Soviets ought to get a dose of it.... I've been of the opinion that this money was better spent to hurt our adversaries than other money in the Defense Department budget.
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Afghanistan/Afghanistan_CIA_Taliban.html
Or like the 750,000 Cambodians killed by US bombing
Or like the 3 plus million killed in Vietnam
Or the 50,000 Nicarguans killed.
Or the butchery that was the US civil war - what, some half a million?
Or the myriad other countries where the US has butchered innocents.