1
   

Forgiveness and repentance

 
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Feb, 2004 06:14 pm
I'm more intereseted in the way images were used to convey complex theological doctrine to the laity, (see Gregory I's comments on the role of images as the "bible of the illiterate," and Bernard de Clairvaux's later comments on teh same subject.).
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Feb, 2004 06:18 pm
micah wrote:
Portal Star wrote:

Micah - do you believe in hell, and satan?


yes, hell and satan are real...

You are aware the the Christian "Satan" is a farily recent construct? It probably dates from the later first century CE. Certainly the Jews did not have a similar construct. In the Torah, various angels serve as "Satans" or adversaries. In Job the role of Satan is fulfilled by one of the angel who seems to have a role similar to that of a prosecutor in modern court proceedings. The "devil" really only shows up in modern form in Revelation.
If you have a chance you should read Jefferery Russell. His work is fascinating, and quite readable from the perspective of novice or professional.
Portal, have you looked into the arguments surrounding the representation of the Devil in the Isenheim altarpiece? fascinating stuff.
0 Replies
 
micah
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Feb, 2004 06:19 pm
Frank Apisa wrote:
First you tried to get me to take Paul's word over the word of Jesus...and now you are trying to get me to take YOUR word over the word of Jesus.

Now why should I take your word -- rather than the word of Jesus in this matter?


frank, i'm only offering my interpretation on the subject....obviously you don't agree....but perhaps, in time, i can find a better answer for you...
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Feb, 2004 06:23 pm
On the subject of this thread's title, I find the equation of the Magdalen with penitence, and her very popuilar cult in the twelfth century very interesting. Sermons from the era emphasize the need to sin in order to more fully receive proper forgiveness. I have often wondered how much of this was an attempt to allay lay anxiety at the validity of sacraments performed by a cleargy that was seen as openly corrupt.
0 Replies
 
micah
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Feb, 2004 06:28 pm
hobitbob wrote:
micah wrote:
Portal Star wrote:

Micah - do you believe in hell, and satan?


yes, hell and satan are real...

You are aware the the Christian "Satan" is a farily recent construct? It probably dates from the later first century CE. Certainly the Jews did not have a similar construct. In the Torah, various angels serve as "Satans" or adversaries. In Job the role of Satan is fulfilled by one of the angel who seems to have a role similar to that of a prosecutor in modern court proceedings. The "devil" really only shows up in modern form in Revelation.
If you have a chance you should read Jefferery Russell. His work is fascinating, and quite readable from the perspective of novice or professional.
Portal, have you looked into the arguments surrounding the representation of the Devil in the Isenheim altarpiece? fascinating stuff.


i have sent you a pm re: satan (a link)
0 Replies
 
micah
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Feb, 2004 06:29 pm
hobitbob wrote:
On the subject of this thread's title, I find the equation of the Magdalen with penitence, and her very popuilar cult in the twelfth century very interesting. Sermons from the era emphasize the need to sin in order to more fully receive proper forgiveness. I have often wondered how much of this was an attempt to allay lay anxiety at the validity of sacraments performed by a cleargy that was seen as openly corrupt.


no reason to dwell on the past, especially because God says the chruch will grow up much like a person...
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Feb, 2004 06:38 pm
micah wrote:
[

i have sent you a pm re: satan (a link)

And I responded. The site you sent was so full of nonsense as to be useless.
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Feb, 2004 06:39 pm
micah wrote:
hobitbob wrote:
On the subject of this thread's title, I find the equation of the Magdalen with penitence, and her very popuilar cult in the twelfth century very interesting. Sermons from the era emphasize the need to sin in order to more fully receive proper forgiveness. I have often wondered how much of this was an attempt to allay lay anxiety at the validity of sacraments performed by a cleargy that was seen as openly corrupt.


no reason to dwell on the past, especially because God says the chruch will grow up much like a person...

Willful ignorance of history doesn't make you devout, it just makes you uneducated.
0 Replies
 
micah
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Feb, 2004 06:40 pm
hobitbob wrote:
micah wrote:
[

i have sent you a pm re: satan (a link)

And I responded. The site you sent was so full of nonsense as to be useless.


and so was your private reply to me...but thanks!
0 Replies
 
micah
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Feb, 2004 06:41 pm
hobitbob wrote:
micah wrote:
hobitbob wrote:
On the subject of this thread's title, I find the equation of the Magdalen with penitence, and her very popuilar cult in the twelfth century very interesting. Sermons from the era emphasize the need to sin in order to more fully receive proper forgiveness. I have often wondered how much of this was an attempt to allay lay anxiety at the validity of sacraments performed by a cleargy that was seen as openly corrupt.


no reason to dwell on the past, especially because God says the chruch will grow up much like a person...

Willful ignorance of history doesn't make you devout, it just makes you uneducated.


i didn't say not to know history, i said not to dwell on it.....i'm beginning to really question your reading and comprehension skills
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Feb, 2004 06:42 pm
Fair enough, most of us have given up on yours.
BTW, my reply to you as based on research, not belief. There is a difference.
0 Replies
 
micah
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Feb, 2004 06:45 pm
hobitbob wrote:
Fair enough, most of us have given up on yours.
BTW, my reply to you as based on research, not belief. There is a difference.


your reply was based on researching others' opinions.....
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Feb, 2004 06:46 pm
and I always thought senile dementia was limited to people, I guess now I have to include churches.
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Feb, 2004 06:51 pm
micah wrote:
hobitbob wrote:
Fair enough, most of us have given up on yours.
BTW, my reply to you as based on research, not belief. There is a difference.


your reply was based on researching others' opinions.....

Indeed. Its called scholarship. Constrast this with your method, which seems to consist of making it up as you go along! Wink
0 Replies
 
Portal Star
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Feb, 2004 06:52 pm
hobitbob wrote:

If you have a chance you should read Jefferery Russell. His work is fascinating, and quite readable from the perspective of novice or professional.
Portal, have you looked into the arguments surrounding the representation of the Devil in the Isenheim altarpiece? fascinating stuff.


Cool. I'll be sure to keep my eyes peeled. I really like Leo Steinberg (he focuses on prints.)

I don't think Iv'e studied the Isenhiem altarpiece. I don't focus specifially on religious artwork, there just happens to be a lot of it. I'll remember to listen for such arguments though (is there a site online?)
My favorite bit of visual theistic history is Michelangeo's decision to put the (was it a cardinal's?) head on the man whose crotch is being bitten by a snake. It was the man who was condemning nudity in art as sacreligious.
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Feb, 2004 06:57 pm
The best one off the top of my head is Ruth Melinkoff's The Devil At Isenheim: Reflections of Popular Belief in Grunewald's Altarpiece, (Berekely :University of California Press, 1988-ish). I think its out of print, but a good university library should have one. I bought mine from Hopkins at their semesterly book sale, they had two othrs. Michael Baxendall has also written on the Isenheim Altarpiece, but then what has he not written on?
0 Replies
 
Portal Star
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Feb, 2004 06:57 pm
Yes, Micah, clearly your arguments are so well presented and logical they have blown everyone away.



Do you really believe there is a demon inside the earth who tortures/roasts dead humans for all eternity? How does he torture them? Do you believe non-christians will go to hell?

The Egyptian heaven was called the happy field of food. Pharos promised the slaves they would go there if they were good.
The Chinese during the T'and dynasty believed that whoever tryly pronounced the name of Amithabha, one of the many Buddhas worshiped, would be reborn in a lapis lazuli paradise with jeweld trees.
The christians believe in a place with resurrected winged humans, and harps. I don't think they have any sex there.
And, we have all heard of the virgins promised to unibombers.
What makes your belifs different from any of these?

What do you think of the holy wars?
0 Replies
 
Portal Star
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Feb, 2004 06:59 pm
hobitbob wrote:
The best one off the top of my head is Ruth Melinkoff's The Devil At Isenheim: Reflections of Popular Belief in Grunewald's Altarpiece, (Berekely :University of California Press, 1988-ish). I think its out of print, but a good university library should have one. I bought mine from Hopkins at their semesterly book sale, they had two othrs. Michael Baxendall has also written on the Isenheim Altarpiece, but then what has he not written on?


Cool, I'll ry to remember to look for it in the library. Grunevald was a very intereting artist! Isenhiem altarpiece = the tryptich for the leper hospice, righgt?
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Feb, 2004 07:01 pm
Yup. Grunewald was know for drinking his commisions the moment he got them. He would also happily paint a Protestant or Catholic piece, depending on the patron.
0 Replies
 
micah
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Feb, 2004 08:05 pm
Portal Star wrote:
Yes, Micah, clearly your arguments are so well presented and logical they have blown everyone away.



Do you really believe there is a demon inside the earth who tortures/roasts dead humans for all eternity? How does he torture them? Do you believe non-christians will go to hell?

The Egyptian heaven was called the happy field of food. Pharos promised the slaves they would go there if they were good.
The Chinese during the T'and dynasty believed that whoever tryly pronounced the name of Amithabha, one of the many Buddhas worshiped, would be reborn in a lapis lazuli paradise with jeweld trees.
The christians believe in a place with resurrected winged humans, and harps. I don't think they have any sex there.
And, we have all heard of the virgins promised to unibombers.
What makes your belifs different from any of these?

What do you think of the holy wars?


i'll be happy to answer all your questions, one at a time...which one would you like answered first?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 01/11/2025 at 06:48:58