1
   

Forgiveness and repentance

 
 
micah
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Feb, 2004 02:46 pm
ok....lets put the bible aside for a moment....

my point can be illustrated in nature....there are certain creatures that eat their young....do we, as humans, try and stop them?

no, we do not...animals do some pretty nasty things....they are constantly killing each other....do we stop them? no we don not?

why do we not stop them? because its natural right?

we also are animals....in a sense, whatever we do (including murder, rape, etc.) could be viewed as natural.

however, we are 'civilized'....most of the world gets its government from the romans....who in turn created their laws from an external source...that source was.....the bible....

my point IS illustrated in nature.....in nature, there is no right and wrong, there is just nature...we are a part of nature and so how could ANYTHING we do be 'wrong'???

unless.....we have an EXTERNAL guideline....a 'creator' so to speak....to make right and wrong clear for us regardless of our subjective feelings.
0 Replies
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Feb, 2004 03:56 pm
truth
Micah, which are the most ethically and morally mature, the "believers" in absolute morals who "follow" rules for fear of burning in Hell, or the "nonbelievers" who behave according to their ethical standards knowing that there is no eternal reward or punishment for their "good" behavior? It seems to me that for the former, "good behavior" is a means to an end (reward or avoidance of punishment); for the latter, "good behavior" is an end in itself. For the former, good comes from without; for the latter good comes from within. Which would you rather be?
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Feb, 2004 04:02 pm
micah wrote:
ok....lets put the bible aside for a moment....

my point can be illustrated in nature....there are certain creatures that eat their young....do we, as humans, try and stop them?

no, we do not...animals do some pretty nasty things....they are constantly killing each other....do we stop them? no we don not?

why do we not stop them? because its natural right?

we also are animals....in a sense, whatever we do (including murder, rape, etc.) could be viewed as natural.

however, we are 'civilized'....most of the world gets its government from the romans....who in turn created their laws from an external source...that source was.....the bible....

my point IS illustrated in nature.....in nature, there is no right and wrong, there is just nature...we are a part of nature and so how could ANYTHING we do be 'wrong'???

unless.....we have an EXTERNAL guideline....a 'creator' so to speak....to make right and wrong clear for us regardless of our subjective feelings.


What are you thinking about here?

Listen...

...it is not certain there is a God.

I know you "believe" there is a God -- but it is not a certainty.

Even if there is a God -- the god described in the Bible may be light years away from what that God is like.

But we humans have made rules so that society can function.

There were rules in place LONG before your god started to dictate rules.

And who really needs a God to tell us that we should not allow people to murder indescrimately? Do we really need a God to tell us that we should not steal -- or that there is value in being able to trust each other when we give our word?

Adultery causes men to become jealous -- which often leads to violence -- so there is no need for a God to tell us that adultery is a problem.

Do we need a god to tell us we ought respect our parents and our elders -- that we ought treat our neighbors with respect -- that we ought not to covet other people's property?

(The answer is NO to all those questions, in case you are having trouble with this snap quiz, Micah.)

Let me tell you what kinds of rules we need gods for:

We need gods to tell us that if we discover someone in a homosexual relationship, we should stone them to death. (By the way, you mentioned earlier about the folly of picking and choosing what laws we want to obey. I have to ask you: When was the last time you stones a homosexual to death?)

We need gods to tell us that we should burn incestuous people to death.

We need gods to tell us how and when to slaughter our enemies.

We need gods to tell us how to treat our slaves -- and how we should buy them.

Micah, we need gods, in the words of Gloria Steinham, the way a fish needs a bicycle.



Don't you get it?
0 Replies
 
micah
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Feb, 2004 04:04 pm
Re: truth
JLNobody wrote:
Micah, which are the most ethically and morally mature,
the "believers" in absolute morals who "follow" rules for fear of burning in Hell, or the "nonbelievers" who behave according to their ethical standards knowing that there is no eternal reward or punishment for their "good" behavior?[/quote]

in my humble opinion, you have a misguided perspective....

it's not about who is more mature ethically....it's about the search for truth...and then, responding to that truth.....

i think i have illustrated that right and wrong can not be subjective...there must be an external guideline, otherwise you might as well say, killing innocent babies is ok, as we see in 'nature'....

on a side note...Christianity is not a blind faith....it is a faith based on evidence.....
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Feb, 2004 04:15 pm
Re: truth
micah wrote:
JLNobody wrote:
Micah, which are the most ethically and morally mature,
the "believers" in absolute morals who "follow" rules for fear of burning in Hell, or the "nonbelievers" who behave according to their ethical standards knowing that there is no eternal reward or punishment for their "good" behavior?


in my humble opinion, you have a misguided perspective....

it's not about who is more mature ethically....it's about the search for truth...and then, responding to that truth.....

i think i have illustrated that right and wrong can not be subjective...there must be an external guideline, otherwise you might as well say, killing innocent babies is ok, as we see in 'nature'....

on a side note...Christianity is not a blind faith....it is a faith based on evidence.....[/quote]



It is absolutely, totally, 100% BLIND FAITH!
0 Replies
 
micah
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Feb, 2004 04:18 pm
Frank Apisa wrote:
There were rules in place LONG before your god started to dictate rules.


yes, God has stated that he has also stamped his laws on our hearts so that no one has any excuse....

Frank Apisa wrote:

And who really needs a God to tell us


too many people equate God with laws and rules when we should be equating God with Love...

Frank Apisa wrote:

We need gods to tell us that if we discover someone in a homosexual relationship, we should stone them to death.


frank...i know you are not ignorant of the differences between the old and the new testament.....i also know you are familar with story of the prostitute in the new testament.....'those without sins may cast the first stones'.....

Frank Apisa wrote:

We need gods to tell us that we should burn incestuous people to death.
this is a horrible practice in the past that can not be blamed on God...the bible states, much like a person, the church will grow up...

Frank Apisa wrote:

We need gods to tell us how and when to slaughter our enemies.

Jesus pleads with us to love our enemies...


Frank Apisa wrote:

We need gods to tell us how to treat our slaves -- and how we should buy them.


now now frank....you know we're discussing this in another thread....too much to add here...
0 Replies
 
micah
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Feb, 2004 04:23 pm
Re: truth
Frank Apisa wrote:
It is absolutely, totally, 100% BLIND FAITH!


it's not...a simple 'google' search with the keywords: 'evidence for christianity' will reveal a plethora of evidence...both physical and scientific...i myself have posted scientific proof of God in another thread here and that was only one example...
0 Replies
 
Portal Star
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Feb, 2004 06:22 pm
As someone with a strong interest in Biology, I feel the need to point out that nature is not evil.

Nature is designed to survive, and the specific instance you mentioned - eating their young - has a purpose.

Animals eat their own young when:
1. The young are sick/defective and would not live anyway
2. The parents are starving and could not nurse/raise their own young
3. Their living space is too crowded (and would be squalid/would not
support young.)

[This does not include male lions, which will kill their step-children because it forces the female lion to ovulate and become fertile again]

There are reasons for this amorality among animals, because they exist to exist. There are also many cases of "morality" in social animals (we are social animals, by the way) which use what we could call a moral code as social support and this helps them survive. Ex: wolves, prarie dogs.
0 Replies
 
micah
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Feb, 2004 06:29 pm
Portal Star wrote:
As someone with a strong interest in Biology, I feel the need to point out that nature is not evil.


yes! which proves my point.....i said in nature good and evil do not exist because it is nature/natural....

because we also are animals ANYTHING we do could be called nature/natural....

again, unless we have an external guideline...
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Feb, 2004 06:48 pm
segue: The vast majority of scientists who disagree about evolution disagree as to how species evolved, not as to whether they evolved.
So they debate about how continues, with creationism there is no debate ergo their is no science in "scientific creationism"
nature may abhor a vacuume but cares nil about idiocy regarding the intellectually absurd concepts of forgiveness and repentance.
0 Replies
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Feb, 2004 07:20 pm
truth
Right, Dys: "intellectually absurd", meaning it's not even wrong.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Feb, 2004 07:21 pm
Re: truth
micah wrote:
Frank Apisa wrote:
It is absolutely, totally, 100% BLIND FAITH!


it's not...a simple 'google' search with the keywords: 'evidence for christianity' will reveal a plethora of evidence...both physical and scientific...i myself have posted scientific proof of God in another thread here and that was only one example...



You have never posted a scientific proof of God in another thread -- or anywhere else.

You are a deluded individual.

And your "faith" is nothing more than that -- pure, blind acceptance -- the kind of thing that had a certain amount of charm when exhibited by ancients or kids -- but which looks retarded when seen coming from an adult.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Feb, 2004 07:33 pm
micah wrote:
Frank Apisa wrote:
There were rules in place LONG before your god started to dictate rules.


yes, God has stated that he has also stamped his laws on our hearts so that no one has any excuse....


And I suppose you will tell us how you know there is a God -- and how you know what that god has stamped and what it has stamped it on????

Gimme a break!


Quote:
Frank Apisa wrote:

And who really needs a God to tell us


too many people equate God with laws and rules when we should be equating God with Love...


If you are talking about the god of the Bible -- you sure as hell better be thinking about rules rather than love -- because the god of the Bible abounds in the former and show damn near none of the latter.


Quote:
Frank Apisa wrote:

We need gods to tell us that if we discover someone in a homosexual relationship, we should stone them to death.


frank...i know you are not ignorant of the differences between the old and the new testament.....i also know you are familar with story of the prostitute in the new testament.....'those without sins may cast the first stones'.....


I am well enough acquainted with the Bible to know that no less a personage than Jesus Christ himself is quoted as saying:

"Do not think that I have come to abolish the law and the prophets. I have come, not abolish them, but to fulfill them. Of this much I assure you: UNTIL HEAVEN AND EARTH PASS AWAY, NOT THE SMALLEST LETTER OF THE LAW, NOT THE SMALLEST PART OF A LETTER, SHALL BE DONE AWAY WITH UNTIL IT ALL COME TRUE." Matthew 5: 17ff

Stoning homosexuals is part of the law. Jesus says it still stands.


Quote:
Frank Apisa wrote:

We need gods to tell us that we should burn incestuous people to death.
this is a horrible practice in the past that can not be blamed on God...the bible states, much like a person, the church will grow up...


Like hell it can't. It came right from the mouth of the god of the Bible.

So don't give me that nonsense that it cannot be blamed on your god.




Quote:
Frank Apisa wrote:

We need gods to tell us how and when to slaughter our enemies.

Jesus pleads with us to love our enemies...


Yeah, he was a good Joe. But the god of the Bible most assuredly does tell us how and when to slaughter our enemies.

"When you march up to attack a city, first offer terms of peace. If it agrees to your terms of peace and opens its gates to you, all the people to be found in it shall serve you in forced labor. But if it refuses to make peace with you and instead offers you battle, lay siege to it, and when the Lord, your God, delivers it into your hand, put every male in it to the sword, but the women and children and livestock and all else in it that is worth plunder you may take as your booty and you may use this plunder
of your enemies which the Lord, your God, has given you." Deuteronomy 20:10

What a sweetheart that god is!!!





Quote:
Frank Apisa wrote:

We need gods to tell us how to treat our slaves -- and how we should buy them.


now now frank....you know we're discussing this in another thread....too much to add here...


Yeah that is a tough one. I don't blame you for ducking it.
0 Replies
 
micah
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Feb, 2004 08:35 pm
Frank Apisa wrote:

And I suppose you will tell us how you know there is a God -- and how you know what that god has stamped and what it has stamped it on????


Psalm 19:1
The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament shows his handywork.

Romans 1:20
For the invisible things of Him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse.

Frank Apisa wrote:

I am well enough acquainted with the Bible to know that no less a personage than Jesus Christ himself is quoted as saying:

"Do not think that I have come to abolish the law and the prophets. I have come, not abolish them, but to fulfill them. Of this much I assure you: UNTIL HEAVEN AND EARTH PASS AWAY, NOT THE SMALLEST LETTER OF THE LAW, NOT THE SMALLEST PART OF A LETTER, SHALL BE DONE AWAY WITH UNTIL IT ALL COME TRUE." Matthew 5: 17ff

Stoning homosexuals is part of the law. Jesus says it still stands.


well....lets take a closer look...

How did Jesus fulfill the law? In his personal life He fulfilled all the demands of the law by living a sinlessly perfect life under it (Galatians 4:4; John 8:46; Hebrews 4:15; 1 Peter 2:21-22). He also fulfilled the prophecies of the law concerning Christ (John 5:39; Acts 3:18-24; 13:29; 2 Peter 1:19) and the types of the law (Hebrews 8:4-5; Luke 24:44-47). By preparing the Jews for the coming of Christ, the law fulfilled its purpose in Him (Galatians 3:19-25). Finally, the righteousness before God which was the purpose of the law but which it could not give is fulfilled in Christ (Romans 8:3-4; 10:4-10). Having been fulfilled, the law has served its purpose.

Jesus came to pay the debt to law, a debt that man could not pay. Colossians 2:14 teaches that Christ's death "cancelled out the certificate of debt consisting of decrees against us and which was hostile to us; and He has taken it out of the way, having nailed it to the cross." Thus Christ in His death for all mankind satisfied the requirements of the Law. Those who are in Christ are no longer bound by such; our debt has been fully paid.

Following the death, burial, and resurrection of Christ, the inspired apostles taught that the Law of Moses was no longer in effect. In Romans 7:4, Paul wrote, "Therefore, my brethren, you also were made to die to the Law through the body of Christ, that you might be joined to another, to Him who was raised from the dead, that we might bear fruit for God." In v6 he said, "But now we have been released from the Law, having died to that by which we were bound, so that we serve in newness of the Spirit and not in oldness of the letter."

In Galations 3:24-25, Paul said, "Therefore the Law has become our tutor to lead us to Christ, that we may be justified by faith. But now that faith has come, we are no longer under a tutor." In Ephesians 2:14-15, he said that Christ "broke down the barrier of the dividing wall (between Jews and Gentiles) by abolishing in His flesh the enmity, which is the Law of commandments contained in ordinances."

In 2 Corinthians 3:6, Paul spoke of the Law as "the ministry of death, in letters engraved on stones" and as a "ministry of condemnation". He referred to such as "that which fades away" and "the old covenant. Paul said we are "servants of a new covenant, not of the letter, but of the Spirit; for the letter kills, but the Spirit gives life."

Finally, consider the letter to the Hebrews, the very subject of which is a comparison of the old and new covenants. The writer said in 1:1-2: "God, after He spoke long ago to the fathers in the prophets in many portions and in many ways, in these last days has spoken to us in His Son." The inspired writer then, in the remainder of the letter, explains that the way of Christ is far superior to the Old Law of Moses.

Hebrews 7:11 speaks of Christ as another priest who would not be needed "if perfection is through the Levitical priesthood." But since such was not possible, "of necessity there takes place a change of law also" (v12). V18 speaks of "setting aside of a former commandment because of its weakness and uselessness." V22 says that Christ then is the "guarantee of a better covenant."

Hebrews 8:6-7 states that Christ "is the mediator of a better covenant, which has been enacted on better promises. For if that first covenant had been faultless, there would have been no occasion sought for a second." Then in v13 it says, "When He said, A new covenant, He has made the first obsolete." Hebrews 9:1 and 9:18 speaks of the "first covenant" compared to the "new covenant" in 9:15 and 12:24. Hebrews 10:1 says that the Law was simply a "shadow of the good things to come and not the very form of things." 10:9 says, "He takes away the first in order to establish the second."
0 Replies
 
Portal Star
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Feb, 2004 08:59 pm
micah wrote:
Portal Star wrote:
As someone with a strong interest in Biology, I feel the need to point out that nature is not evil.


yes! which proves my point.....i said in nature good and evil do not exist because it is nature/natural....

because we also are animals ANYTHING we do could be called nature/natural....

again, unless we have an external guideline...


Yes, we are animals who are social and have a social hierarchy. Like other social animals, we have responsibility to one another. This is not necessarily divine.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Feb, 2004 09:03 pm
MIcah said; again,
Quote:
unless we have an external guideline.
..
isn't that what fortune cookies are for?
0 Replies
 
micah
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Feb, 2004 09:07 pm
Frank Apisa wrote:
Yeah, he was a good Joe. But the god of the Bible most assuredly does tell us how and when to slaughter our enemies.


Judgement is Gods'......God is slow to anger.......logically, he can be angered....God created men and he can destroy them according to his will.

perks ya get for being God....

only he knows, but perhaps those souls will be with God in heaven...
0 Replies
 
micah
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Feb, 2004 09:10 pm
Portal Star wrote:
micah wrote:
Portal Star wrote:
As someone with a strong interest in Biology, I feel the need to point out that nature is not evil.


yes! which proves my point.....i said in nature good and evil do not exist because it is nature/natural....

because we also are animals ANYTHING we do could be called nature/natural....

again, unless we have an external guideline...


Yes, we are animals who are social and have a social hierarchy. Like other social animals, we have responsibility to one another. This is not necessarily divine.


you've missed the point again portal star....

......i'm trying to get you to see the sillyness of it all.....

if humans are to judge right and wrong subjectively, then you can't tell someone it's wrong to kill innocent babies (i showed this to be true above)

...and that is silly.....because we have external guidelines...and no they are not fortune cookies...
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Feb, 2004 09:22 pm
fortune cookies are as well reasoned a guide for understanding the meaning life as any but thats ok, I forgive your lack of cosmological gestalt. Tolerance for ambiguity is not often a christian trait.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Feb, 2004 09:34 pm
They are pc cookies, dys.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 01/10/2025 at 03:08:54