@JPB,
Quote:Let's discuss the impact of the US leaving Afghanistan. Grant me, if you will, that the people of the US had multiple missions going in. We can debate forever whether we should be there. You'll be hard pressed to convince many Americans that our entry there was anything other than a response to a declaration of war against the US with the full backing of the Taliban - the ruling gov't of Afghanistan at the time. Yes, it was a new definition of war here. Like it, or not, that is the reality
Maybe, just maybe, "many Americans" got it wrong, JPB?
Why was such a "response"
necessary, apart from appeasement of internal US sensitivities?
Reason enough for an invasion & a war on the
people of Afghanistan?
I don't think so. I didn't think so at the time, either. I thought it was an extreme (politically-motivated ) overreaction to 9/11. With some other important considerations too, like what might benefit US, financially.
What exactly could the beleaguered
people of Afghanistan
do to appease US outrage to 9/11? Absolutely nothing.
Most were probably not even aware of 9/11. And may not even be aware of it now.
Yet it was the impoverished, invasion-weary, ordinary people who have suffered the most as a result of US retaliation to 9/11, not those who caused it.
You can't ignore that. Nor ask others to, in asking for suggestions for solutions for the future.
Can you even
consider the notion that American sensibilities are not so much different to sensibilities of
any citizens, in
any other country on the planet when a serious injustice is done to them?
You simply cannot ask people to conveniently dismiss the injustice which has occurred in Afghanistan (as if it never happened) while considering the best way to go for here-on.
The injustice
occurred. Any reparations have to take that into account.