Gracie wants 2 know...

Yu guys slay me.
Very funny! Manscaping with Nads...with Listerine and the bananas...very good.

When I was 1O,
first I cut it off n when it grew back,
I used Nair. It stunk.

Then I gave up; not happy about THAT situation.
I liked it better b4.





David

This is a private and personal matter for everyone,
and I don 't care much what anyone thinks; its no skin off MY back,
but I 'll mention it 1ce, what the hell:
atheists and people who have committed suicide
and returned to life in hospitals have reported some problems related to those matters,
such as to dissuade them from continuing to be atheists
or to commit suicide again, but to each his own; its none of my business.





David

I don't think it is possible to commit suicide more than once.

Thank u for that information
but that will not necessarily stop anyone from DOING it.
I 'm not gonna test it.





David

None of those products belong to me, I'm the innocent one.

The bananas were hilarious! But please, please tell me that the Listerine has nothing to do with the waxing. <hides eyes, covers ears>

I have no idea what the listerine is for, well actually if I did tell you he would kill me tomorrow

So when people die clinically, they hallucinate. Yup...sounds kind of reasonable.

Probably the same things that menthol life savers or Mentos are for..as a guess.

You got something against atheist?
What are you implying? Atheist are wrong and they go to hell?

'To each his own?' Sure doesn't seem like it...

No, not if thay r peaceful n don 't scream at me.
That has happened more than 1ce (unprovoked).



There have been some complaints about that.
Have u seen I Survived . . . Beyond and Back ?



Its just a public service message; accept it or reject it.
I don 't intend to suggest it to u again.





David

Well, u say that as if u knew what u were talking about.
Some of what decedents (in hospitals) have observed of their relatives
in the waiting rooms have resulted in decedents going to their lawyers
and disinheriting relatives who decedents saw bad-mouthing them
while thay were dead in surgery. Thay coud not deny it because
the rest of their families were witnesses to the defamations.

In one case, a decedent (while dead) saw 2 of her family members
who detested smoking accompany another family member
who went out to light up; in their nervous tension & fear
(regarding the well being of decedent in surgery) thay ALL lit up cigarettes,
and decedent saw that and commented on it after returning to life.

Thay had done that only when she was in a state of death,
as per her surgeons' testimony. Upon awakening, decedent
brought that up; she saw it happen. Her knowledge of that surprized her family.
I have met quite a few survivors of death and medical doctors
who have treated them or who study survival at meetings
of their group and elsewhere; thay r all over the place.

My surgeon told me that I died 2ice during surgery.
Unlike them, I have no memories thereof.
I only remember awakening in the ICU,
but because of my out-of-body experiences while awake,
I find it plausible. I think that the Law of the Conservation of Energy
applies to conscious life.





David

If we'd run a book on who was manscaping at the age of 10, who would have backed David?

I began lifting weights when I was 9.
Talk about painful charliehorse cramps in calf muscles!





David

Dave, I had real problems with this word. At first I thought you meant dissident, now I think it's decendent, but you missed the n sound out. I know you think that your phonetic spelling is logocal, but in this instance it's confusing.

Incidentally there is a doctor in Southampton who is carrying out research into out of body experiences, by placing messages on the tops of cupboards where those lying in bed couldn't possibly see them. The research is ongoing.

Decedent is a word, which would be spelled that way even by the poor spellers of England. David's problem is in using it for those who have not, in fact, died. A decedent is he or she who is deceased. This isn't the first time recently that David fails to distinguish between those who were thougth to be dead and those who actually did die. A decedent cannot disinherit anyone, because he or she is dead, and cannot therefore take any action.

I've never heard it before, we would refer to them as 'the deceased.' I think it must be one of those words that only Americans use, like gubernatorial.

There are bad spellers over here, but I understand the situation is much worse in America, people missing letters out as a matter of course, and some even make a virtue of their terrible spelling. It must be very difficult.

He can and he has, after the period of death has expired, e.g., by successful defibrillation.
The "death" applies only to the man 's deciduous meat-suit,
not to his conscious mind. Its only molting, like a lobster.
There is mistaken identity between the man himself
or herself and his or her deciduous outer covering.

Its interesting that some of them were dead (in the medical sense:
no EKG, no EEG, no respiration) for about an hour, after heart attacks.
I deem that medical definition to be competent & sufficient.

I also find decedent's remote accurate observations to be most telling.
I can 't think of any logical reason (nor illogical reason) to reject them.





David

That a doctor thinks someone is dead, and that someone subsequently regains consciousness is evidence of either the ignorance of the doctor, or the less than comprehensive state of medicine. If the heart is not pumping blood to the brain, you've got a few minutes until irreversible brain damage is done. So no one who were "dead" for an hour would escape that damage, unless the blood were still circulating--in which case, he or she had never been dead.

You can say what you like, but these people cannot accurately be called decedents (and i have no doubt you think you can argue that they are). You can argue that they were presumed decedents, but not that they actually were decedents.