@roger,
roger wrote:
Both are positive sounding, but meaningless stock phrases.
I don't agree.
Whereas one is a piece of top down rhetoric from a totalitarian beaurocracy looking to keep people in control, the other is an objective identity used to characterize democratic "horizontalism."
It's also not so positive to be in the 99%. It's not like it's so great to be a part of this group. The point in fact is very much that the group is pretty much the lamest place to be, but it's our reality. Pledging our loyalty and worship of the wealthy 1% will not be rewarded. The only positive is that in your struggle, you're not alone.
A
R
T