@mysteryman,
mysteryman wrote:Thats called theft.
Do you really support that?
Actually it's called trespass. (Theft would be if protesters loaded the banks' houses onto their pickup trucks and drove away with them.) Since your discussion style depends so heavily on confidently throwing legal terms around, perhaps you want to make an effort to use them correctly.
As to your question, I wouldn't go as far as supporting it. Occupying a bank's houses is clearly illegal, even if they stand empty. I don't support illegal acts unless there's a compelling reason to break the law. And while it's fine to take a stand against some banks' abuses of their property rights, it doesn't rise to the level of a compelling reason to break the law. A better way is to develop OWS-friendly candidates for the Democratic primaries and run them against incumbents, including Barack Obama. Once they succeed at getting themselves elected, they can change property laws as necessary.
But although I wouldn't support OWS in breaking the law, I sympathize with their reasons for breaking it. Accordingly, I will shed no tear for the afflicted banks if they do.