@georgeob1,
georgeob1 wrote:Quote:
Are you seriously not going to address the several analysts I linked to who predicted that it won't be long at all before solar eclipses all other forms of energy in terms of low cost per KwH? Yaknow, the ones you said I was 'making up?'
I scanned a couple of them.
You should have read all of them, and thoroughly. But you can't be bothered with that ****, can you? None of it supported your argument, so you weren't interested in it - at all.
Quote:They were full of highly selective data, unsupported long range extrapolations & forecasts as well as deceitful references to distant forecasts as though they were current facts.
You're making that up. Right? I mean, that's the level of analysis you like to see in cases like this. Right?
I linked you to news pieces about analysts who were discussing the continuing drop in solar prices, and how this will affect the market in the long run. Several different ones - ones you said I 'made up.' I clearly did not. Your quibbling over their predictions now is simply bullshit dodging on your part - per your usual when you have egg on your face.
Quote:I particularly enjoyed the headline in the Reuters piece that China plans to "double" it solar output in a year from one gigawat to two. That's the equivalent of adding ONE major powerplant in a country that is building hundreds of GW coal fired plants every year and which now has about 15 much larger nuclear plants under construction.
This is why you should read **** instead of skimming it. From that piece:
Quote:The solar feed-in tariff, the price of solar-generated electricity, could drop below 0.80 yuan (12.5 cents) for each kilowatt-hour (kWh) by 2015, which would be on par with conventional coal-fired power tariffs by that time, according to s report by the Energy Research Institute, led by the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC).
YOU stated that analysts weren't claiming that this was true, I provide you evidence that analysts ARE claiming this is going to happen, and you dance around rather than just man up and admit you were wrong when you accused me of 'making things up.' It's ******* pathetic, man, and every single person on this forum can see through your condescension act.
Quote:
You are very adept at searching the web for garbage that fits your preconceptions, but compartatively very ignorant of both the subject matter and the science and engineering behind it. In short your opinions (and web searches) aren't worth much.
They are worth far more than your constant assertions, which have a value of zero. Perhaps less than zero, since they essentially represent a massive waste of time for everyone involved.
You are frequently completely wrong and never, ever admit it. You're assertions are worth nothing.
Quote:Cycloptichorn wrote:
You're smoking something if you think any one of the crop of losers your side has put forward has a chance of beating Obama, who not only is far more intelligent than any of them, he's far more LIKED and has far more MONEY. That's not a recipe for a GOP victory.
I'll remember this tip from the uber-bombastic and omniscient one. Perhaps I'll dig it out after next year's election.
I hope you do. Nevertheless; all the things I wrote above are true, and Obama is comfortably leading all your candidates in practically every competitive state being polled, including FL and OH.
Cycloptichorn
