wandeljw
 
  0  
Reply Sat 20 Aug, 2011 02:20 pm
@Setanta,
I can not climb to your level of hysteria, Setanta.
Setanta
 
  2  
Reply Sat 20 Aug, 2011 02:29 pm
@wandeljw,
Continuing to call it hysteria will not make it so, Wandel. Don't mistake contempt for emotion. That is one of the most common, and most feeble of tactics online. Accuse your intelocutor of an unbridled emotional response, implying that yours is the expression of sweet, calm reason. It's childish and unconvincing. Your remark was thoughtless and insulting, and you're trying everything you can to weasel out of the responsibility for that. Now you're reduced to accusing those who are accusing you of being hysterical.

No hysteria, Bubba, just the relentless intention to point out how shitty and patronizing your remark was.
wandeljw
 
  0  
Reply Sat 20 Aug, 2011 02:38 pm
@Setanta,
Contempt is an emotion and it is way out of proportion to what I said. That is why I am relentless about pointing out your hysteria.
Setanta
 
  2  
Reply Sat 20 Aug, 2011 02:43 pm
@wandeljw,
This is the first definition for contempt which appeared in a web search:

The feeling that a person or a thing is beneath consideration, worthless, or deserving scorn.

Call that emotion if you like, it doesn't rise to the level of hysteria. You must be terribly impressed with your own significance. You're a legend in your own mind.
wandeljw
 
  0  
Reply Sat 20 Aug, 2011 02:49 pm
@Setanta,
When the contempt is inappropriate it rises to the level of hysteria.
chai2
 
  2  
Reply Sat 20 Aug, 2011 02:56 pm
@wandeljw,
wandeljw wrote:

I can not match your hysterics or Setanta's hysterics.


You can't know that these are hysterics.
wandeljw
 
  0  
Reply Sat 20 Aug, 2011 03:01 pm
@chai2,
Sorry, hysterics is too lukewarm a description.
chai2
 
  2  
Reply Sat 20 Aug, 2011 03:05 pm
@wandeljw,
You can't know that.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  2  
Reply Sat 20 Aug, 2011 03:33 pm
@wandeljw,
The contempt was appropriate. The only hysteria here is your hysterical refusal to admit you were wrong.
wandeljw
 
  0  
Reply Sat 20 Aug, 2011 03:36 pm
@Setanta,
You're cute when you're hysterical.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  2  
Reply Sat 20 Aug, 2011 03:38 pm
You, however, are ugly when you hysterically refuse to admit you were wrong.
wandeljw
 
  0  
Reply Sat 20 Aug, 2011 03:38 pm
@Setanta,
do you need a hug? i do.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  2  
Reply Sat 20 Aug, 2011 03:41 pm
Yeah, i'm sure you do. However, the little dogs and i just had a long walk, so i'm in good shape. You . . . not so much.
0 Replies
 
wandeljw
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Aug, 2011 08:16 am
That was fun, yesterday. We should do it again sometime.
0 Replies
 
Thomas
 
  5  
Reply Sun 21 Aug, 2011 09:27 am
@chai2,
chai2 wrote:
I see a woman who looks scared shitless and about to break into a run.

That's a projection. We know from the woman herself that this is not what happened. Indeed she says she has been fighting your interpretation for 60 years.

MSNBC.com wrote:
“Some people want to use it as a symbol of harassment of women, but that’s what we’ve been fighting all these years,” Craig said in a telephone interview from her home in Toronto. “It’s not a symbol of harassment. It’s a symbol of a woman having an absolutely wonderful time!”

As to whether the photo was staged, that's true as far as the men being at that street corner at that time. According to a catalogue I bought in an exhibition this photo was in, there was a first snapshot in which the men looked into Sorkin's camera. Sorkin didn't like that, so she told Ninalee Craig to turn around and do the walk again, an told the men to look at Craig, not into the cameral. So the photo wasn't staged, except the part where the Italian guys ogling the American girl. So the part everybody talks about was staged. Craig only talks about her repeating the walk, but doesn't mention Orkin rearranging the guy's looks---appropriately so, as it made no difference to her---but if you Google for " "American girl in Italy" staged", you find several articles confirming it.

The creep factor of this picture comes from projections of modern American women. It has no basis in what the Italian guys did in reality, nor in what the "victim" of the looks actually perceived at that time.
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Aug, 2011 09:36 am
@Thomas,
Quote:
The creep factor of this picture comes from projections of modern American women. It has no basis in what the Italian guys did in reality, nor in what the "victim" of the looks actually perceived at that time.


Those same cocksure feelings have probably landed more than a few innocents in jail.
Thomas
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Aug, 2011 09:52 am
@JTT,
Perhaps I should add that the creep factor is a projection as far as this particular photograph is concerned. Elsewhere, in the real world, looks like these do happen, and often they do reflect creepy intentions.
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Aug, 2011 10:12 am
@Thomas,
That goes without saying, Thomas. But I'm glad that you said it.
0 Replies
 
Green Witch
 
  4  
Reply Sun 21 Aug, 2011 10:19 am
Staged or not, I think we project our own life experiences onto the interpretation. As a woman, especially when I was in my teens and 20's, being leered at made me feel uncomfortable and soiled. It was not flattering or fun. Flattering is when a guy you are attracted to gives you a little smile, leering from strange men on the street is just creepy and sometimes scary. I don't think all men really get this, but the ones who do are not the ones doing the public drooling and bug-eyed stares. I assume even the worst offenders think they are being harmless, or charming and might even hope the woman might notice them in a positive way. However, this type of harassment is also a way to control women and make them feel vulnerable, thus making even the wimpy man feel powerful. Most offending men would never take it to the next level of physically confronting a woman, but, as most women can tell you, there are men who do take it to the next level. There are men who start with a leer, next make some rude comment and then go even further by following you or trying to step in front of you. A woman never knows where these leers will lead and thus we cringe and go on the defensive when we see an image like this.
chai2
 
  2  
Reply Sun 21 Aug, 2011 10:45 am
@Green Witch,
Well said.
 

Related Topics

Beautiful Animals - Discussion by Roberta
Aloha! - Question by boomerang
Photo lovers -- take a look at this.... - Question by boomerang
Michael Belk's modern Jesus photographs - Question by boomerang
LIGHTHOUSES OF THE WORLD. - Discussion by farmerman
Is taking his picture legal? - Question by aquestion
Amazing History Photos - Discussion by hopelessjoe
Poor travel pictures, well loved. - Discussion by ossobuco
Just a Photo - Discussion by Pitter
Knockout landscape photos - Discussion by ossobuco
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 7.66 seconds on 12/19/2024 at 08:55:19