17
   

What would your gut be telling you?

 
 
joefromchicago
 
  6  
Reply Fri 8 Jul, 2011 09:51 am
Here's one solution to the problem: just don't let gay people in the public pools.

Quote:
City officials in Hazard, Ky., have refused to change the anti-gay policy at a public swimming pool that evicted a developmentally disabled gay couple due to their sexual orientation.

A storm of protest had erupted in the small, eastern Kentucky town after a worker at the Hazard Pavilion recreation center cited the Bible as authority that “gay people” weren’t allowed to swim there and forced the two men to leave the property on June 10.

I think that bible verse was Leviticus 18:31(a), which reads: "Thou shalt not swim with mankind as with womankind: it is abomination. Also, that Speedo that thou thinkst thou canst wear because thou couldst wear it when thou werest a teenager and thou has been meaning to get thyself in shape but thou hasn't found the time to hit the gym? Yeah, about that -- thou shouldst really take a look in the mirror sometime. Talk about an abomination. Oh, and thou, over there! Yeah, thou, the kid in the red swim trunks! THOU SHALT NOT RUN!"
roger
 
  3  
Reply Fri 8 Jul, 2011 01:41 pm
@joefromchicago,
Uh yeah. Get your fat ass outta' the pool and into the gym.

Bible's full of stuff like that.
0 Replies
 
Ionus
 
  0  
Reply Sun 10 Jul, 2011 07:36 am
XI Commandment
All gay people shall live in New York (aka Sodom)
0 Replies
 
CalamityJane
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Jul, 2011 09:38 am
On facebook there is a group called "OP safe kids"
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Op-SafeKids/114268165331646
where people scan the facebook for possible child pornography. They give
links to the "OP safe kids" wall and they take it from there.

What made me think of this thread is that in one link that was given, there were
little boys photographed (without their knowledge) in public swimming pools.
Pictures of little boys in their bathing suits. One picture (it's been taken down now) shows a little blond boy sitting with his wet bathing pants and eating ice cream. He looks in a different direction and wasn't aware that a picture of him was taken. The comments next to the pictures were pretty disgusting and it seems there is a facebook portal where these kind of pictures can be exchanged.

0 Replies
 
tsarstepan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Jul, 2011 09:44 am
@joefromchicago,
joefromchicago wrote:

Here's one solution to the problem: just don't let gay people in the public pools.



Interesting idea Joe. Show very explicit yet legal-age-of-consent based pornography to all males wishing to use said public pools before they enter pool. If they don't respond physically... um... down there then they will NOT be allowed use of the pool facilities. If they do ... um ... react physically... um... down there then they will allowed entrance into such public facilities. Wink
CalamityJane
 
  2  
Reply Sat 16 Jul, 2011 10:04 am
@tsarstepan,
I don't know when the topic switched to gays, but it shouldn't be the issue here.
Gay people have a right to their own sexuality and be allowed to engage with whomever they want to, as long as they're doing so consensually and are adults.

We're talking about pedophiles here and they need to be stopped!!
Thomas
 
  2  
Reply Sat 16 Jul, 2011 10:09 am
How about elderly ladies going to the swimming pool and staring at the penises of men they don't know? These men didn't consent to having their penises stared at. So, do women like Chai2 need to be stopped, too?
tsarstepan
 
  2  
Reply Sat 16 Jul, 2011 10:16 am
@CalamityJane,
This thread HAS always been of gay sexuality when Chai saw a gay couple probably interested in adopting a child admiring a child at the pool. She who overreacted and assumed the worst.
CalamityJane
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Jul, 2011 10:18 am
@Thomas,
No! This is just payback time for all the drooling and staring at the ladies dècolletè when they were young.
Thomas
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Jul, 2011 10:19 am
@CalamityJane,
Gotcha.
0 Replies
 
chai2
 
  -3  
Reply Sat 16 Jul, 2011 10:55 am
@CalamityJane,
CalamityJane wrote:

No! This is just payback time for all the drooling and staring at the ladies dècolletè when they were young.


No, this is just where thomas decides to continute to be childish and irritating on purpose, thinking he's being provocative and riveting, when in fact the result is more of "ok, how long are you going to continue to drag this on? "
thomas is like the putz at a party who continues to flog something long after others are trying to make polite conversation, trying get the talk to go anywhere else but some ad nauseum point that's making everyones eyes glaze over.

yes thomas yes. you're very clever. my you're so clever thomas, I just can't believe how clever you are.
come on everyone, let's all tell thomas how clever he is. I hope you go on for many more posts with the same type of comments, because believe me, it just never gets old. I could read your nitpicking for hours on end.

you're a one trick pony, you know that?


sure, go ahead and stop elderly ladies from doing something. Stop me even from doing something. Doesn't conflict at all with stopping pedaphiles.

yes yes, you're right thomas, you're right about everything you've said about me and the situation.

Now what?

chai2
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Jul, 2011 04:04 pm
@tsarstepan,
tsarstepan wrote:

This thread HAS always been of gay sexuality when Chai saw a gay couple probably interested in adopting a child admiring a child at the pool. She who overreacted and assumed the worst.


tsar, I have sat here for over 2 minutes trying to formulate a reply to this.

I can't. I mean I can't form a reply that doesn't convince me that you aren't totally kidding, and that is this a viable answer.

I cannot for the life of me understand how you, who I had always considered an intelligent person, could possibly, in any situation, use the word "probably" in your explanation.

I can't even address the sexuality thing anymore, because it has been repeated so many times, including in my initial post, that any further discussion of this aspect is irrelevant.

How do YOU know it was a gay couple tsar? You weren't there. How in the world you can use the word probably in a statement without knowing the relationship, commitment level etc etc and jump to the hare-brained conclusion that they are probably looking to adopt a child.

Yes, you're right. They probably were in the midst of an adoption tsar. And the man in question was so enchanted with his plans of adoption he singled out one of many children there, who was no cuter than any other present.
In addition, the joy of the impending adoption caused him to get an erection when interacting on a totally different day with other young boys.

How about this tidbit...I'm at that pool 3 or 4 times a week. I saw those 2 men together a total of twice.
The man who was staring at one boy, and got an erection while talking to other boys, has never come back since then.
I've seen the other guy there alone, maybe 5 more times.

I guess the missing man is in a forgein country right now, picking up their child. I'm certain I'll be seeing the 3 of them together soon.
Or maybe he's staying at home with their baby.
Yeah, that must be it.

Or, since I saw no evidence of a committed relationship, they both got what they wanted out of it, and aren't together anymore.

If I come home and find a pile of puke with string mixed in it on the floor, and one of the cats with a gooey string hanging out of his mouth. I'm going to overreact and assume the worst, that the cat vomited.

In the future I'll make sure to first go to all 3 of my neighbors who have keys to my house, and find out if maybe they came over to surprise me by cooking me dinner while I gone, but suddenly became ill on my tile floor, and had to leave to bring back a bucket to clean it up. I'll bet when I start over to a neighbors house, I'd run into them heading back over to my place with cleaning fluid and a rag.

Seriously tsar?
Really? That's what you think?
Honor bright?

0 Replies
 
girlie
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 11 Apr, 2017 02:00 pm
@chai2,
As I read your replies more I see you are the forum troll to other people as well. Nevermind, I won't take you personally. Smile
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.26 seconds on 12/04/2024 at 08:52:51