@hawkeye10,
OmSigDAVID wrote:
I 'm not even sure whether, in these circumstances
of the most recent pictorial appearance,
a politician coud survive in France, let alone here.
I wonder what Francis' opinion is about that.
hawkeye10 wrote: Who is the victim here?
I don 't believe that the operative consideration,
the functional consideration being argued here is victimization.
The issue is conceived as being whether
IN THE ABSENCE OF A VICTIM,
American culture will tolerate a sexual exhibitionist on-the-job in Congress.
I am not taking a position (tho I will have to at election time; I 'm not gonna stay home on election day).
hawkeye10 wrote:So far as I know none of the women that Wiener was sexting complained,
it was only because he made the mistake of hitting "reply to all" that we become aware of this,
thousands of people got one of his tweeets by mistake.
Yes, a
mistake; I think he 'd agree to that, but was it an
accident????
I suspect that some part of his subconscious mind was having some fun with that, with the
perversity of the act.
Maybe his
conscious mind was in on it too . . . .
He 's been called
"a psycho" because of his pictorial adventures.
It makes me remember him in his
pre-scandal days,
screaming, pointing his finger in all directions, jesticulating wildly on the floor of Congress.
Some might say: like "a psycho". There was not much complaint of that because it was not sex-related.
How
b r o a d is his psychopathy ????????