@BillRM,
Quote:Good theory but this case had a rush to judgment signs all over it as he was about to leave the country so we arrested him and then try to find some reason any reason to justify the arrest.
Now that the NYC legal system had so must face involved do you honestly think they care if the evidence support or does not support his guilt?
You have it backward--they arrested him because they had reason to believe he had committed several serious, violent felonies. The arrest was justified before it was made.
You seem to feel that the equivalent of a trial should be held prior to even making an arrest. Have you considered the fact that a significant time delay in making an arrest might leave potentially dangerous, or violent people at large in the community, not to mention that it would allow them, as well as others who have committed crimes, the opportunity to flee the jurisdiction and remain unapprehended.
You and Hawkeye might not consider Strauss-Kahn dangerous, but he is charged with committing violent acts which do present a danger to the community--he is charged with forcibly sexually attacking a person who was a stranger to him. He just didn't do it on a dark street--he did it in a $3000 a night hotel suite--but it's the same forcible sexual assault he's charged with as the person who does it on the street or in some dark alley, Strauss-Kahn is just charged with doing it in more comfortable surroundings. The fact that he holds a prestigious day job does not alter the nature of the crimes he is accused of, and the lack of a prior criminal record does not change the nature of those crimes either, and it simply means he was never charged before.
And he was about to leave the country when he was arrested...and forensic evidence on his body would have disappeared with him. So, given what they felt was a credible report of a crime, and knowing the identity of the person who was accused, and the fact he was already at an airport, they had reason to make an arrest quickly.
If your wife reported she was forcibly sexually assaulted by someone on the street, received treatment at a hospital for injuries, and she was able to identify a man out of a police line-up, wouldn't you expect the police to make an arrest? Wouldn't you want them to be able to gather forensic evidence from his body, to support your wife's allegations, before that evidence was no longer available? Or would you doubt even the word of your own wife if she claimed a stranger sexually assaulted her?