@engineer,
Quote:Why do you think she "registered concern for her job" when neither participant in the case has claimed that?
She claims to have made this point to DSK, and many employees say that after that fact her job was her main concern. She might have made it all up, but based upon what we know of her I believe that she said something to that effect to DSK. It fits with a professional victim who will not take responsibility for her actions, she did not object to the sex directly, did not take a personal opinion on it, only registered concern that she was going to get into trouble with the employer. DSK knew that this would never happen, thus her only stated objection to the sex was not a problem, so she was in his mind willing to give him a blow job. I have no doubt that DSK will say that she gave him a blow job, that this was not a face **** event.
Quote:What evidence do you think is necessary to prove rape? In the absence of witnesses, is it possible to prove it to your satisfaction?
Witnesses, physical injury, the alleged abuser having a history of abuse and the alleged victim not having a history as a victim, blood work that indicate that the alleged victim was likely passed out.....I have already long been on record that most of these sex cases, especially the ones that take place in ongoing intimate relationship, should not be a criminal matter. Most of what you want to prove as rape I dont want to be rape even if the facts are as alleged.