9
   

Is the Head of the IMF a Sex Criminal?

 
 
panzade
 
  2  
Reply Thu 26 May, 2011 06:51 pm
@Ionus,
Quote:
Women will seize power by becoming attorneys and DA's....then men will be humble

Oh Oh. your paranoia is coming back.
I never said anything like that, and you know it.

Quote:
Do you see the sisters as the only ones who believe in the rule of law ?

No. did you see anything in my post that implied that?
I believe NO is the correct answer.

Quote:
( it will be too scared shitless to sleep, but that's beside the point)


Emasculation nightmares. I believe it's fairly common with macho men.


Quote:
Men are doing a lousy job aren't they ?

Back in the 50's and 60's? Yeah, men did a bad job of prosecuting sexual assaults... a real bad job.It's gotten better. It'll get better still.

Quote:
I think you understand this very well, you are just pretending to be stupid .


I really don't understand your references...at all.
panzade
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 May, 2011 06:54 pm
@Ionus,
Quote:
But you did say that when we get more women in law and law enforcement then we will see more prosecutions .


I didn't say that. Maybe you understood it that way.
I said or implied that the cases would be stronger with better results.
0 Replies
 
panzade
 
  2  
Reply Thu 26 May, 2011 06:56 pm
@hawkeye10,
Quote:
I am sure that he got that word for word from a feminist PR piece, as I have certainly seen that spiel before in efforts to change the hiring standards so that the ranks of women in the police forces can be quickly expanded to what the feminists think that it should be.


I'm really disappointed in you hawk. You must be wearing yourself out writing all these posts. Now you're just going through the motions.
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 May, 2011 06:59 pm
@Ionus,
Quote:
He hasnt been found guilty yet...why should he pay a cent if he is innocent ? You sisters like a good lynching, dont you ?

This has nothing to do with guilt or innocence. It has to do with the extra services the City is required to provide because of him.
Quote:
Manhattan Borough President Scott Stringer expressed outrage Thursday at Former International Monetary Fund Chief Dominique Strauss-Kahn's living arrangements after he was moved into a $14 million TriBeCa townhouse, where he will remain under house arrest on sex assault charges.

Stringer said Strauss-Kahn is living "high off the hog" while awaiting trial and that no part of it should be on the city's dime.

"We can't do anything about the decision to grant him house arrest," said Stringer. "But we can demand and collect every penny he costs the people of New York for his lifestyle. The circus may be in town, but that doesn't mean we New Yorkers have to pay for it."

Stringer said Strauss-Khan should pay the city back for any costs incurred through a constant police presence, extra sanitation to clean up the area where the media is camped out and keeping traffic flowing.

The borough president also said other high-profile defendants have not required so much city expense.

Strauss-Kahn moved into the four bedroom, five bath home in TriBeCa late Wednesday night.

The three-story, 6,800 square foot townhouse located at 153 Franklin Street rents for $50,000 a month.

He will remain there until the conclusion of his trial on charges he sexually assaulted a maid at the Sofitel hotel in Midtown.

Strauss-Kahn will only be allowed to leave for court, doctor visits and religious services. However, some say his presence has already disrupted the routines of neighborhood dwellers.
http://manhattan.ny1.com/content/top_stories/139801/stringer-slams-former-imf-chief-s-luxurious-lifestyle

Quote:
He will pay $50,000 per month for rent, according to reports, but if Manhattan Borough President Scott Stringer has his way, the tab will be higher.

Stringer is calling for Strauss-Kahn to pay for the cost of extra city services during his stay, which include extra police officers, sanitation workers, enforcement for traffic congestion and impacts on pedestrians.

“At a time when the city is cutting back on essential services and layoffs are imminent, we need to know what taxpayer-funded services are being dedicated to monitoring this man’s every move,” said Stringer, in a statement. “Dominique Strauss-Kahn has cost New York enough as it is – I am demanding today that he repay the city for any ancillary costs incurred as a result of his temporary residency in downtown Manhattan.”
http://www.rew-online.com/2011/05/26/dominique-strauss-kahns-move-to-153-franklin-attracts-controversy/

Strauss-Kahn is ticking off a lot of people for a lot of different reasons.
Ionus
 
  -2  
Reply Thu 26 May, 2011 06:59 pm
@panzade,
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
As more and more women enter police forces, the ranks of attorneys, D.A.s and P.A.s and judge ships, this good ol' boy network that protected the cock-sure sexual assaulter in the past will disappear.
Women will seize power by becoming attorneys and DA's....then men will be humble
paranoia is coming back.
Who's ? Yours ? You see an old boy network protecting sex offenders ? And only women will change that . Is this because men have no morals but the sisters are the only human beings who do ?

Quote:
I never said anything like that, and you know it.
Read the above again till you recognise that you did say it .

Quote:
Quote:
( it will be too scared shitless to sleep, but that's beside the point)
Emasculation nightmares. I believe it's fairly common with macho men.
Over compensating for physical weakness....I believe it is fairly common with inadequate women .

0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  -2  
Reply Thu 26 May, 2011 07:02 pm
@panzade,
panzade wrote:

Quote:
I am sure that he got that word for word from a feminist PR piece, as I have certainly seen that spiel before in efforts to change the hiring standards so that the ranks of women in the police forces can be quickly expanded to what the feminists think that it should be.


I'm really disappointed in you hawk. You must be wearing yourself out writing all these posts. Now you're just going through the motions.
That sounds like evasion....if you are going to parrot the feminist line then I will point out that you are doing so. I gather that you consider that a compliment, but really, it is not.
0 Replies
 
Ionus
 
  -2  
Reply Thu 26 May, 2011 07:03 pm
@panzade,
Quote:
men did a bad job of prosecuting sexual assaults
Based on what evidence ? The sisters opinion ?

Quote:
It's gotten better. It'll get better still.
But only because women will be in more positions in law and law enforcement in your opinion, right ? Rubbish .
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  -2  
Reply Thu 26 May, 2011 07:06 pm
@firefly,
Quote:
Strauss-Kahn is ticking off a lot of people for a lot of different reasons.
In a civil society managed through the rule of law emotional response does not drive action......oh wait, we are not that civilized anymore...
0 Replies
 
Ionus
 
  -2  
Reply Thu 26 May, 2011 07:08 pm
@firefly,
Quote:
It has to do with the extra services the City is required to provide because of him.
What the hell are you talking about ? Because he exists the city is out of pocket ? It is because he was charged with an offence, and is innocent until PROVEN guilty that he doesnt owe a cent till IF he is found guilty .

What happened to the responsibility of the Judge who didn't put him in the slammer with everyone else ? How much will the Judge be paying ?
hawkeye10
 
  -2  
Reply Thu 26 May, 2011 07:14 pm
@Ionus,
Quote:
What the hell are you talking about ? Because he exists the city is out of pocket ? It is because he was charged with an offence, and is innocent until PROVEN guilty that he doesnt owe a cent till IF he is found guilty
you seem to be confused....billing from the police has nothing to do with guilt or innocence, it is a question of does the police department like you or not. If you make them do work that they dont want to do they bill you, if they want to do it then the taxpayer pays. Work generated by Frenchman accused of raping a black hotel chambermaid.......ya, you know which list that is going to end up on....
0 Replies
 
firefly
 
  2  
Reply Thu 26 May, 2011 07:34 pm
@Ionus,
Quote:
It is because he was charged with an offence, and is innocent until PROVEN guilty that he doesnt owe a cent till IF he is found guilty .

That doesn't make any sense.

This isn't related to guilt or innocence. It's related to the flamboyance with which he is choosing to serve his house arrest.
As Stringer said
Quote:
"We can't do anything about the decision to grant him house arrest," said Stringer. "But we can demand and collect every penny he costs the people of New York for his lifestyle."

He's contributing to attracting the crowds. They may not be able to get him to reimburse the City, but I admire Scott Stringer, the Manhattan borough president, for trying.

The man has the legal presumption of innocence, but he is still charged with serious, felonious crimes which he might very possibly have committed. That doesn't exactly encourage anyone to roll out the welcome mat for him.

Ionus
 
  0  
Reply Thu 26 May, 2011 07:36 pm
@firefly,
Quote:
He's contributing to attracting the crowds.
Is he waving his penis out the window ?

It could more fairly be laid at the feet of whoever gave him house arrest . Where was the Judge's attempt to stay within a budget ?
hawkeye10
 
  0  
Reply Thu 26 May, 2011 07:53 pm
@firefly,
Quote:
This isn't related to guilt or innocence. It's related to the flamboyance with which he is choosing to serve his house arrest
Oh I see, if he would willingly suffer enough in his house arrest you would not be in favor the state adding to the $200,000 a month that he is already paying, not including the house.....

You are such a vindictive bitch.
firefly
 
  2  
Reply Thu 26 May, 2011 08:11 pm
@Ionus,
Quote:
It could more fairly be laid at the feet of whoever gave him house arrest . Where was the Judge's attempt to stay within a budget ?

The City was perfectly willing to keep him on Rikers Island...
Ionus
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 26 May, 2011 08:13 pm
@firefly,
Quote:
The City was perfectly willing to keep him on Rikers Island...
So why wasnt the Judge ? Perhaps if they did and he was found innocent he would have sued the city for even more then he is costing them now .
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 May, 2011 08:25 pm
@hawkeye10,
Quote:
Oh I see, if he would willingly suffer enough in his house arrest you would not be in favor the state adding to the $200,000 a month that he is already paying, not including the house.....

He's paying the $200,000 for security because he chose that option over Rikers.

It's not a question of wanting him to suffer during house arrest, it's more that when he chooses to serve it in a $50,000 a month luxury townhouse he is asking for the sort of negative reaction he has been getting from people like Scott Stringer.
DSK's flamboyance is contributing to making it even more of a circus than necessary, and that does wind up costing the City more money. I hope they get some of it back from him.

hawkeye10
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 26 May, 2011 08:31 pm
@firefly,
Quote:
DSK's flamboyance is contributing to making it even more of a circus than necessary, and that does wind up costing the City more money. I hope they get some of it back from him.
DSK is responsible for what he does, not for what other people do. If crowds are showing up near his home causing problems for the police, and you think that this event needs to be billed, then take up a collection on the street. The people causing the expense are the ones who should pay. As IONUS says, he is not waving his dick out of the window, DSK has done nothing to encourage the crowds.

Your sense of fair play and ability to assign personal responsibility are deeply flawed.
0 Replies
 
firefly
 
  2  
Reply Thu 26 May, 2011 08:35 pm
@Ionus,
Quote:
So why wasnt the Judge ? Perhaps if they did and he was found innocent he would have sued the city for even more then he is costing them now .

The judge was perfectly willing to leave him on Rikers Island. He was the one who wanted out.
Even if he's found not guilty at trial, which is not the same as being "innocent", he can't sue the city. They've already justified the arrest in court and a grand jury handed down an indictment. They've been playing by the book.





0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 26 May, 2011 09:01 pm
Quote:
We met in a private club in Paris four or five years ago.
'He shook my hand and very clearly said his name. I nicknamed him Genghis Khan - the only difference between then and now is his hair, it was speckled now its whiter.
'He was in the club like everyone else there, he wanted to have a drink, a dance and if you feel like it go off with someone.
'In Paris, like everywhere else in the world, you can decide at any moment to flirt - not like Italy.'


When asked why Strauss-Khan had begun to flirt with her, Miss Kiss, who boasts on her website that 'sex is her reason for living' said: 'He was very sweet. I was with friends and he was on his own.
'He tried to attract the attention of an older distinguished lady but she gave him a look which said she was not interested so he just smiled back at her.
'He tried with others but with no luck. What attracted me to him was the fact he was such a gentleman despite all the rebuttals he got. He then approached me and he got it together with a friend and myself.'


Miss Kiss, who says on her website she makes porn movies 'for passion not the money' adding she likes 'extreme sex' went on: 'He wasn't randy or woman hungry like people are making him out.
'He was very gentle, educated and not a dribbling dog as can often happen - in fact he treated us both very sweetly, he cuddled me and that's what stuck in my mind.
'I was in Paris for a week and I went to that club every night - he came three or four times. One evening he came really late, we chatted for a bit then we all went back home to sleep.'
When asked what her impression of Strauss-Khan was she said: 'I have no doubt that he is a very nice person, it's disgusting what he is being put through.
'Dominique does not need to rape a woman - if he wants he can just pay an escort or do as he did in Paris and go to a private club to enjoy himself for a bit. He is just a libertine.
'I know men. The emotional sexual side, if it's like that is like that. He is not violent, the picture that has been described of him is not him, as I say I still remember his cuddles.'

Miss Kiss has made five pornographic movies and is now a director. She was nominated in 2004 for a prize at the Barcelona Erotic Film Festival losing out to Anastasia Mayo.
Last week former madam Kristin Davis, whose escort service also catered to the former governor of New York, Eliot Spitzer, said she provided prostitutes for Strauss-Khan in 2006 when he was France’s presidential nomination as a Socialist.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1391127/Porn-star-Natasha-Kiss-claims-enjoyed-threesome-Dominique-Strauss-Kahn.html#ixzz1NWBJtmGe


This is the depiction of DSK that sounds right to this libertine....and one that we hear from his friends and most of his associates.
0 Replies
 
firefly
 
  2  
Reply Thu 26 May, 2011 09:11 pm
Quote:

Amazing Photo Of Strauss-Kahn Meeting The Obamas
Joe Weisenthal
May 26, 2011

Great find by NYMag from the IMF's Flickr page. DSK meeting the Obamas.

Barack's face and hand say it all.
http://static4.businessinsider.com/image/4ddeaba4ccd1d57d2c150000/dominique-strauss-kahn-obama-barack.jpg
http://www.businessinsider.com/strauss-kahn-meets-the-obamas-2011-5

That is funny! ROFL Laughing
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.16 seconds on 11/17/2024 at 06:31:04