9
   

Is the Head of the IMF a Sex Criminal?

 
 
engineer
 
  4  
Reply Thu 26 May, 2011 11:14 am
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:

They had time to check on rumors of this man character but not to check thier facts with the airline for example?

You keep hitting on this when it is completely besides the point. The police are called. The SVU comes it and verifies the story sounds plausible and there is reason to go forward. (Note that they have a reputation of being hard on the woman making the accusation to make sure they have a cause for arrest.) The phone rings and it's the alleged perp so they set up a sting and arrest him. The police on the ground had no idea of why he was flying, where he was flying, his connection to the IMF, etc. They didn't check any rumors, call France or ask for permission from the President. They were tasked with arresting the man. All the other stuff about him being about to flee comes from the media folks in the NYPD. Saying that the playing up the heroics of police in capturing this fleeing bad guy somehow casts doubt on the SVU doing its job doesn't make any sense. Those two things aren't connected. If you want to make the case that the media fabrication and the perp walk were staged to damage DSK in the public mind, I'm with you, but it looks like the SVU did its job and the arrest of DSK was right in line with what should have happened.
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 May, 2011 11:20 am
Quote:
Strauss-Kahn Accuser Expects Reputation Attack
By Karen Freifeld
May 26, 2011 .

The alleged victim of Dominique Strauss-Kahn’s attempted rape and sexual attack hired additional legal counsel in anticipation of an assault on her reputation and credibility, her lawyer said.

Attorney Norman Siegel, former director of the New York Civil Liberties Union, and former Assistant U.S. Attorney Kenneth P. Thompson, who prosecuted the New York City police officers for the beating and torture of Abner Louima, have begun to work on behalf of the 32-year-old hotel maid from Guinea, according to Jeffrey Shapiro, who has been representing her.

“We anticipate the defense in this case is going to mount some sort of an assault on her,” Shapiro, a New York personal- injury lawyer, said today in a telephone interview. “It requires a team effort” to protect her, he said.

Siegel and Thompson did not immediately return calls for comment. Shapiro said a civil suit had not been discussed at this point.

The trio met yesterday, and another meeting is planned for tomorrow, Shapiro said. “In any case like this, they will try to discredit her in some manner, so she needs to be protected,” Shapiro said.

The alleged victim is doing well, the lawyer added.

“She’s very strong,” he said. “She’s with her daughter. She’s happy to be done with testifying to the grand jury. She’s going to be okay.”

Bronx Home
The woman has a 15-year-old daughter and, until the incident, they lived in the Bronx.

“She has not been able to go back to work,” Shapiro said. “The hotel has continued to pay her, but that is not a long- term solution. That’s an interim solution.” He said no one else is providing her with support, and that her housing must be dealt with in the long term.

Shapiro said he had no knowledge that anyone had approached the maid’s family in Guinea with offers of money to make the case go away, as the New York Post reported.

William Taylor, a lawyer for Strauss-Kahn, said in a statement yesterday that reports of Strauss-Kahn’s attorneys’ or representatives’ being in contact with the woman or her family are false.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-05-26/strauss-kahn-rape-accuser-adds-counsel-expecting-attack-on-her-reputation.html

I am glad that she has additional attorneys. This is going to be a very ugly ordeal for her.
Old Goat
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 May, 2011 11:22 am
@BillRM,
His God daughter was a budding journalist at the time, young and pretty and just waiting for the big "scoop" to come along. Her family were close to his, and she had no reason to believe that there was any reason other than kindness that he offered her the massive "leg up" by inviting her to do an interview with him, one on one. She was going to get a big exclusive that would go a long way to making a name for herself in the world of journalism.
She thought it a bit strange that his first condition of the interview, was that he held her hand throughout the entire thing.
Within minutes, she says, he was all over her, with her pushing and punching to break free.
She managed to get out, but was "advised" by various people, including her own family, that she should not take it any further because it would have meant that she would be immediately up against the French "establishment", and that her career in journalism would fly out the window.


Now, it seems very likely that she had no axe to grind before that meeting, and it also seems highly unlikely that she would make all this up now, knowing full well the probable "establishment" storm that she would provoke against her, so as far as the credibility of her claim is concerned, I think there's a very strong possibility that she's telling the truth.

I'll not reply any more, as I have a life and you are still being somewhat of a twonk about the whole shebang.

You can now have the last word, and I'll exchange posts with you again after the trial.

firefly
 
  0  
Reply Thu 26 May, 2011 11:40 am
The NYC tabloid newpapers are having a field day over this arrest, particularly the NY Post.
http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/dsksleazymoney.jpg
http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/dskbootygaul.jpg
http://www.observer.com/files/article/NY_NYP%20(2).jpg
http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/dskpepelepew.jpg
http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/dskfrenchwhine.jpg
And this is today's paper.
http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/dskchezperv.jpg



hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 May, 2011 11:48 am
@Old Goat,
Quote:
Even though Banon has fallen silent, her mother is now speaking for her. In an interview with France Three in Haute Normandie, Mansouret confirms “without a doubt” that her daughter was assaulted in 2002. In carefully vetted language, not unlike la langue de bois that DSK used in his first interview with Banon for her book of essays, Mansouret states that her daughter’s attacker “lost his head,” but concedes her own error in thinking that it only was “a moment of wildness” for a man attracted to women. The reporter asks if her daughter regrets not filing a complaint. Anne Mansouret says she doesn’t think so, that she advised her daughter against this, given the friendly relations the families could have had. “I thought that for his family that must have been an extremely difficult period and complex to manage” because otherwise this man was “warm, nice, full of talent.”

What traumatized her daughter most over the course of the years, she said, was that as soon as she had a project, she was hounded by the incident and that there was an “invisible barrier” because people were afraid of what she could eventually reveal. Banon’s journalism career was aborted, her mother says, because no press group would have her, and she began to write fiction. She suffered from depression for a long time. Mansouret states that she is no psychiatrist and is unwilling to judge, but this sort of predatory behavior is a form of violence.
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/dsk-s-french-accuser_571448.html?page=2
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  -2  
Reply Thu 26 May, 2011 11:50 am
@firefly,
Quote:
The NYC tabloid newpapers are having a field day over this arrest, particularly the NY Post.
I am sure that you are having a great time promoting anti French prejudice....
0 Replies
 
firefly
 
  0  
Reply Thu 26 May, 2011 11:52 am
@firefly,
And the columnists in the NY Post aren't given to mincing words either..or hiding which side they are on.
Quote:

Sexist DSK had France in his pants
By ANDREA PEYSER
May 26, 2011

Dominique Strauss-Kahn did not act alone. Throughout France, hands are as dirty as those of a chambermaid tasked with scrubbing a $3,000 Sofitel suite.

The upstairs-downstairs saga of the Big Shot who allegedly sexually brutalized the maid did not hatch out of the ether. It is as if the majority of the citizens of France -- locked into 1950s-style notions of sexism, misogyny and racism -- was complicit in the horrific, accused deed.

This is more than a tale about the (now-ex) International Monetary Fund chief and the working gal who cried rape. The sordid affair brings into sharp relief the vast cultural, legal and moral differences between a young United States and a cowardly and decayed France. A nation where the word of a poor, black immigrant is inferior to that of a rich, white knucklehead.

And it has further strained already tenuous relations between the United States and France, that primary spoke in the America-loathing Axis of Weasel, a moniker France earned in 2003 when it betrayed the US and our allies by refusing to support foreign policies.

Yet the French displayed a twisted kind of backbone when its citizens aided and abetted Strauss-Kahn, from his rise as a horny politician to his starring role as alleged perpetrator of a crime that, in this country, is considered a diabolically violent abuse of power.

But to many in France, attempted rape is something quite different: Free love gone bad.

A joke.

If you want to be revolted by a national mindset proudly on display in the Gallic nation, look no further than this hideous nugget penned by social commentator Sophie de Menthon. A woman.

Frenchmen of all political stripes and social castes, she wrote, have "stood there aghast," confronted with images of DSK, as he's affectionately known, handcuffed and under arrest in New York. She went further.

"It creates feelings and reactions which go far beyond what is, essentially, after all just another minor alleged crime."

Minor. Alleged. Crime.

Good Lord. So sexual abuse is but a small hiccup. Like sticking gum under a subway seat. In this worldview, DSK's guilt or innocence is of little consequence. That's because the sexual assault of a poor, powerless lady is nothing at all. But arresting a rich, powerful man is, by definition, the more egregious offense.

Last weekend, a few French feminists -- though the phrase sounds like a contradiction in terms -- came out to protest the misogyny on display in the case of DSK, and victims of sexual assault have just begun to speak up. They won't speak out for long.

Victims might start by muzzling former Justice Minister Elisabeth Guigou, now a parliamentarian. She called pics of the man in handcuffs, "incredibly brutal, violent and cruel" -- but uttered not a word in defense of the alleged victim, a cipher.

"A horrible global lynching!" was how Jean-Pierre Chevenement, a leftist French senator, described the images.

Writing in The Daily Beast, DSK's philosopher pal, Bernard-Henri Levy, actually wrote that the judge in the case "pretended to take him for a subject of justice like any other." Dang!

"Do you know who I am?" DSK reportedly said while allegedly attacking the maid.

Le Figaro and Paris Match helpfully named not only DSK's alleged victim, but for some reason, her 15-year-old daughter. Le Figaro also made a point of giving the accuser's height -- tall -- as if to prove that the dwarfish DSK couldn't possibly have physically overcome the woman.

As the case proceeds, infuriating revelations emerged that friends of the accused fiend tried to buy off his victim through payments offered to her dirt-poor relatives in Guinea. Proudly, they refused.

All I can say is -- thank goodness Strauss-Kahn is to be tried in America, not France.

I am proud to live in a nation where the word of a poor, frightened maid can be taken seriously, and her wealthy, self-important, accused tormentor can be frog-marched to jail.

Just like any other accused felon.
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/sexist_dsk_had_france_in_his_pants_RiAMAsbSsV9594enNROtqM


Quote:
I am sure that you are having a great time promoting anti French prejudice....

I'm not promoting it, I'm just reporting what's going on. The NY Post doesn't need any promotional help, they're going full blast on their own.


hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 May, 2011 11:52 am
Quote:
PARIS – The lawyer for a French writer who alleged former IMF chief Dominique Strauss-Kahn had sexually assaulted her eight years ago said Friday she won't file a criminal complaint against him for now.
The comment from David Koubbi, a lawyer for 31-year-old Tristane Banon, in a TV interview came days after he said they were considering a sexual assault complaint against Strauss-Kahn.
"Our decision has been reserved for later for a very simple reason: Neither Tristane Banon or I want to be manipulated by the American justice system, or help out in any way so that these two cases might be linked in one way or another," he told France's BFM Television.
Strauss-Kahn was jailed Saturday after a hotel chambermaid in New York accused him of trying to rape her. He has denied breaking any laws but resigned as International Monetary Fund chief on Thursday. Lawyers posted $1 million bail Friday for Strauss-Kahn as he awaits trial on attempted rape.
The 62-year-old Socialist had been seen previously as a possible contender in France's 2012 presidential election.

Koubbi said he wants to keep his client's case separate.
"It is absolutely out of the question in the Tristane Banon case that a movement on our part could have as consequence the conviction of Dominique Strauss-Kahn in the United States," Koubbi added. "If Mr. Dominique Strauss-Kahn is to be convicted in the United States of America, it will be because of events linked to the American case, which I know nothing about, that I haven't seen — and about which it's not my job to address.


Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/world/2011/05/20/french-woman-wont-demand-charges-imf-head/#ixzz1NTwBu1U8


Meanwhile Tristane has gone into hiding, and her lawyer says that she has not been in contact with New York. Those who think that the French are going to adopt American sex law are dreaming, as the French can see that our "justice" system sucks.
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 26 May, 2011 11:54 am
@firefly,
Quote:
And the columnists in the NY Post aren't given to mincing words either..or hiding which side they are on.
That piece was linked earlier in the thread...way to pay attention. Are we now to see from you every French bashing thing posted in the yellow press over the last few weeks? I know you want to do it.....
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 May, 2011 11:58 am
@hawkeye10,
Quote:
That piece was linked earlier in the thread...way to pay attention.

The piece is dated today...
hawkeye10
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 26 May, 2011 12:05 pm
@firefly,
firefly wrote:

Quote:
That piece was linked earlier in the thread...way to pay attention.

The piece is dated today...
The New York Post is redating everything, but you still should have caught it that you had seen it before in this thread. I would not even trust that it was written for the Post.

Post: # 4,619,819
http://able2know.org/topic/172134-54
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 May, 2011 12:07 pm
@engineer,
God damn, don't you just hate it when someone comes into a thread and injects heaping measures of common sense!
0 Replies
 
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 May, 2011 12:12 pm
@hawkeye10,
Quote:
I would not even trust that it was written for the Post

You don't trust anything or anybody. What else is new? Laughing

This one is current too...
Quote:
What did they know?
Some hard questions for France’s elite after Dominique Strauss-Kahn’s arrest
May 26th 2011
PARIS

NEARLY two weeks after Dominique Strauss-Kahn’s arrest in New York on charges of attempted rape and sexual assault, the French are still reeling. Talk about the scandal fills the airwaves and front pages, and not only because it disqualifies from next year’s presidential election the man who many thought would win. The affair, and reactions to it, raise awkward questions about French attitudes to class, women, justice and the political elite.

Everybody knew, but nobody said anything. This appears to be what the torrent of commentary amounts to. The argument is complex, not least because although Mr Strauss-Kahn’s womanising in Paris was legendary, he has been publicly accused of sexual aggression only once: by Tristane Banon, a writer, who said she had to fight him off on the floor when she went to interview him in 2002. She did not press charges at the time, and her lawyer says she will not do so, for now.

What has emerged is a portrait of a political culture in which seduction bordering on harassment is rife. “Sexual harassment is not accepted in the workplace in France—except in politics,” says a former colleague of Mr Strauss-Kahn. “Powerful male politicians put the women they work with under immense pressure.” Cosy ties between politicians and journalists, who—like Mr Strauss-Kahn and Anne Sinclair, an ex-television presenter—often marry each other, contribute to an attitude among the elite that their sophisticated mores can police themselves. Privacy laws, and implicit threats of retribution, prop up the culture of self-censorship. Few harassment claims against politicians reach court.

Yet if Mr Strauss-Kahn’s encounters did overstep the line, the media were not the only complicit party. Fingers are being pointed at the Socialist Party itself. “What exactly did Socialist leaders know about DSK’s private life?” asked Libération, a leftish newspaper, in a damning editorial. Anne Mansouret, Ms Banon’s mother and herself a Socialist politician, said this week that François Hollande, an ex-party boss, knew about the assault and even comforted her daughter at the time. Mr Hollande, a strong runner for the Socialist presidential nomination, replied that he had “no knowledge” of the gravity of the charges.

Yet it stretches credulity for the party to say that it had no inkling. Ms Mansouret now says that she regrets advising her daughter at the time not to press charges. In 2008 another Socialist politician, Aurélie Filippetti, declared that she had decided never to be in a closed room with Mr Strauss-Kahn after he hit on her in a “heavy-handed” way. This week Le Monde reported that President Nicolas Sarkozy’s team had compiled documentary evidence of Mr Strauss-Kahn’s activities. “Everyone turned a blind eye,” says one Socialist who knows him well, “because he was a dream candidate.”

On the left in particular, there seems to be a prevailing code under which to refuse sexual advances, even when unwelcome, is somehow bourgeois. Many grandees reacted to Mr Strauss-Kahn’s arrest with horror, not at the accusations, but at the humiliation of an untried powerful figure. Bernard-Henri Lévy, a philosopher who once defended Roman Polanski’s right not to be jailed in America for unlawful sex with a minor, railed against the judge who “pretended to take [DSK] for a subject of justice like any other”. “Nobody died,” snorted Jack Lang, a Socialist ex-culture minister. Few had a good word for the hotel maid; some treated her claims with equal disdain. One left-wing editor, Jean-François Kahn, even dismissed the encounter as a “troussage de domestique”, a reference to an aristocratic entitlement to extract sexual favours from domestic staff. All this leaves the troubling impression of an elite that believes itself exempt from ordinary rules (although both Mr Lang and Mr Kahn apologised for their comments).

In protest, a set of women’s groups organised a weekend march, with banners declaring “We are all chambermaids”. “Sexism in France is prevalent, and rape cases are underreported,” says Linda Ramoul, one of the organisers. “The political elite is totally disconnected.” The business also plays into the hands of Marine Le Pen, leader of the National Front, who has been one of the few to insist on a “presumption of sincerity” for the chambermaid, and who has railed against the “complicit silence” of the elite about Mr Strauss-Kahn’s “pathological” behaviour.

Could the DSK affair change such attitudes? Possibly, but do not bet on it. This week two ex-employees filed charges of sexual harassment against Georges Tron, a junior minister in Mr Sarkozy’s government; Mr Tron called the allegations “nonsense”. It remains to be seen if the claims go anywhere, but they do not help the right. As it is, Mr Sarkozy has not enjoyed a bounce in the aftermath of Mr Strauss-Kahn’s arrest. Polls had suggested the president would have struggled against Mr Strauss-Kahn. Now they say that against either Mr Hollande or Martine Aubry, the Socialists’ leader, he would fare little better.
http://www.economist.com/node/18745425?story_id=18745425&fsrc=rss

The French are questioning themselves, Hawkeye.
spendius
 
  0  
Reply Thu 26 May, 2011 12:22 pm
@Irishk,
Quote:
But you keep repeating it, as if it's somehow important that we remember.


I do not keep repeating that if a suspect denies charges they should be dropped. Not only do I not keep repeating it I have not once said it or implied it. That you think I do is something to do with your comprehension skills. It has nothing to do with me.

I am trying to convey my impressions as they were after the first court appearance. That's all. Basically impressions that in the USA a Kafkaesque process is going on. The inordinate lengths Americans go to to continually sing about how free they are and how happy they are strongly suggests that they feel trapped and miserable, are unaware of the reasons why but are constantly required socially to put a brave face on it.

They are drooping consumers. Betty Friedan explained it in The Feminine Mystique and Midge Decter takes up the theme in The New Chastity and Other Arguments Against Women's Liberation. They can't actually take "having it all". They need to "enjoy" having it all, and to be guided by opinion formers how to do so. And they don't enjoy it. It's boring. And exhausting. They feel betrayed and can't articulate it.

And getting it all and delivering it is so efficient that a vast surplus of over-educated workers are sloshing around the system needing jobs that do not have the distasteful connotation of "work". A blue-collar duty. A new form of slavery.

A fair lot of those "useless" and expensive jobs are created by writing legislation to bring them into being. The jobs have to be expensive because the production of "it all" would shrivel if only a few had enough money to buy what is produced.

A blow job= millions, already, of "dollar/man hours arranged in a hierarchy. And one not easy to get the head round. What possible use is caveat emptor to a nation of 308 million over-excited egos as an employment creator. I don't know how many Americans are engaged in the production of food and clean water and waste disposal but it won't be a lot. The Grateful Dead can warble a few ditties and the foriegn exchange they bring home feeds three states for a year and removes food from other countries as long as those in charge there are supported with equipment, including torture equipment, and expertise.

Congress and the Senate take every decision to the wire just as they do opening the envelope with the winner's name inside or the reverse order of the phone in vote.

So, and this **** is not easy to explain, that performance was about jobs. Getting a share of the action. Layers of roles. Meanwhile drones attack Pakistani villages and the dead are declared insurgents. And the jobs have to be made to look important. So the blow-job has to be a big deal. And what better than the indignation of the neurotic to make it so. Especially as they don't really know what to do with themselves. And a fair number of the role players will have had sex with a woman without her full consent at sometime or other and even demanded that she has an abortion when responsibility needed to be escaped.

Anybody who thinks this alleged event is worse, morally, than an abortion is off their heads as far as I'm concerned.

Scene in massage parlour after neck and back muscles have been slightly toned--

Masseuse-" Would you like any extras sir?"

Gump--"Like what?"

M. "A hand job"

G. " How much?"

M. "25 dollars."

G. How about a blow job?"

M. "That's 50 dollars. I have my daughters piano and ballet lessons to think about and my son needs some new football kit."

In every city and town in the country on a daily basis. M. is under duress to maintain her standing with the Jones's.

I saw a feeding frenzy. And it was ragin'. And ff and her cohort of down-thumbers are fanning its fires. And they like using the expressions which are salaciously larded into their posts. The Bodice Ripping brigade.

And the maid has the lot of them by the short hairs. "I made it all up" would be devasting.





0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  0  
Reply Thu 26 May, 2011 12:26 pm
@firefly,
Quote:
The French are questioning themselves, Hawkeye.
Ya, it is all over the web, and you have posted 3-4 versions of the same story in this thread. We see how it turns out, I saw a snap poll asking if the French Journalists should change their standards on privacy of public figures to protect women and the majority was in the "no" camp, though only 10% above the other position. I get the feeling that you think this is a palm/head moment for the French, but I see no evidence of that. They are extremely repulsed by what they see of the American "justice" system, and have long had little good to say about America, so expecting them to snap the the American positions on sex law and gender roles is a stretch. What you see in America is a lot of gleeful biased and flat out bad reporting on what the French think and feel.
0 Replies
 
Irishk
 
  4  
Reply Thu 26 May, 2011 12:33 pm
Maybe DSK will rely on 'illness' as a possible defense. Time will tell.

"He wasn't a womanizer -- he was sick."

Quote:
Through the windows, the spring evening dimmed to black, and the party moved to the dining room, where the stories continued. Earlier that day at the Café de Flore, Pascal Bruckner, the philosopher, had remarked of Strauss-Kahn, “He wasn’t a womanizer—he was sick.” Everyone at the dinner party agreed, and they, too, spoke of Strauss-Kahn in the past tense.

...

To Pascal Bruckner, the photos showed “the face of a libertine” and “a bulldozer.” Strauss-Kahn had never actually declared his candidacy, and in the past he had been such a lacklustre campaigner that Bruckner suspected that he did not actually want to run. “I think his passion was sex, much more than power,” Bruckner said. “I have many women friends in the Socialist Party who have told me stuff about him. It’s dreadful.” He thought Strauss-Kahn’s friends should have encouraged him to seek psychiatric treatment instead of the Presidency
.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 May, 2011 12:36 pm
@Old Goat,
Quote:
Once in the police station, he was forensically examined, his entire body


So that was just another indignity and invasion of privacy that the maid's allegation put him through.

In Madoff's case they had all the evidence they needed before he was arrested. And allegations about him had been in prestigious economic journals for years and because they were not acted upon billions were looted.

You're not really seeing the point OG. Even if it was not consensual finding scratches on him comes after the invasions of privacy. Okay--it justifies them. But what justified them before that? That's the point.
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 May, 2011 12:43 pm
@spendius,
Quote:
Once in the police station, he was forensically examined, his entire body


Quote:
So that was just another indignity and invasion of privacy that the maid's allegation put him through.


Was it? If he was forensically examined, wouldn't he have to agree to such a procedure?
spendius
 
  0  
Reply Thu 26 May, 2011 12:45 pm
@Old Goat,
Quote:
I'll let that sink in for a sec to let your cogs start whirring


If that sort of circumstantial speculation got you to that point why do you think a guy like that would tackle a woman in her position, an African immigrant cleaner, when Paris was at his mercy in just a few hours? He will have read Flaubert. And seen Alphaville. Even to a tosspot like me she would have been asexual.
panzade
 
  4  
Reply Thu 26 May, 2011 12:50 pm
@hawkeye10,
hawk:women have not been beaten with impunity for hundreds of years,

They certainly have and furthermore I think you know it.

hawk:it is more than a bit presumptuous for you to give your state credit for the change

After re reading my post: I think you're right.

hawk:But good luck with your project of singing the praises of America and our sex laws, you will soon find your chorus weak as Americans rethink what we have allowed to happen when we are not paying much attention to changes the state made in the regulation of our private lives, and their vastly expanded claims of regulatory authority.

We all know your shtick on A2K about the erosions of personal freedoms.And I tip my hat because at least you're consistent.
But you're whistling in the dark along with all those other macho dudes.
As more and more women enter police forces, the ranks of attorneys, D.A.s and P.A.s and judge ships, this good ol' boy network that protected the cock-sure sexual assaulter in the past will disappear.
I'm holding my breath. No problem
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 1.71 seconds on 11/17/2024 at 04:01:36