9
   

Is the Head of the IMF a Sex Criminal?

 
 
BillRM
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 23 May, 2011 12:49 pm
@spendius,
Quote:
You are the most pampered bunch of women who ever existed in the whole history of the universe.


Also the safest from sexual violence as is reflected in the fact that the FBI rapes reports are now at a thirty years low.

0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  0  
Reply Mon 23 May, 2011 12:51 pm
@spendius,
Spendi, you can talk about Ryan Giggs now, he's been mentioned in a debate in the commons under parliamentary privilege.
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 23 May, 2011 12:55 pm
@spendius,
Quote:
You are the most pampered bunch of women who ever existed in the whole history of the universe.
Sounds right, though I am not a history expert. What I do know is that what ever women get it is never enough according to them. I think we see this clearly in the relentless and extensive driving downward the threshold of criminal sexual assault. The vast expansion of the penalty speaks to the vindictiveness of women, current sex crime penalties are what we get when women are allowed by men to wallow in this gender fault.
spendius
 
  0  
Reply Mon 23 May, 2011 12:57 pm
@firefly,
Quote:
Her privacy, even about her possible health issues, or possible past sexual assaults, is being needlessly invaded, even though those factors are irrelevant in determining whether Strauss-Kahn violated the law. His legal team has hired a global investigation firm which will go to Africa and dig up any dirt they can in her past--which they will leak to the press if it will help to discredit her in the public's mind, including the minds of potential jurors. This woman's character and reputation are going to be destroyed by the defense team, if there is any way they can manage that--including the planting of false rumors about her.


Yes--and that's the feminist's fault for picking this fight. None of that would have come about 50 years ago in anything resembling this case.

Right then--you're in the 2011 superbowl battle. Do you expect the other side to just lie down and strew some rose petals for your progress. Have a heart.

I have seen nothing since the first court appearance which has diminished the meaning I saw in it. The male judge in the second appearance clearly enjoyed the experience.
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 May, 2011 01:02 pm
@ehBeth,
Quote:
what do you do when you've got the taste of something you don't want in your mouth?


You spit it out of course. Personally I do it in one if I can. I don't take a tour of the premises spitting it out a bit at a time. That's a bit like a Tom Cat marking out its patch. Does the lady come from anywhere near Dahomey?
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 May, 2011 01:09 pm
@hawkeye10,
Quote:
which she had so little of that the ran to the suite bathroom to throw up when investigators took her back.


But did the investigators check whether she had actually thrown up. All we have here is that she ran into the bathroom and some throwing up noises were presumably heard. Or her word was taken on the matter. Did she operate the "Send it" lever or button as one would if one had thrown up in a posh hotel's porcelain in front of a few witnesses. I would anyway.
hawkeye10
 
  0  
Reply Mon 23 May, 2011 01:11 pm
@spendius,
spendius wrote:

Quote:
what do you do when you've got the taste of something you don't want in your mouth?


You spit it out of course. Personally I do it in one if I can. I don't take a tour of the premises spitting it out a bit at a time. That's a bit like a Tom Cat marking out its patch. Does the lady come from anywhere near Dahomey?
Doesn't it read as the act of a woman who's beef is with the owner of the room, not the man who just vacated the room?
hawkeye10
 
  0  
Reply Mon 23 May, 2011 01:15 pm
@spendius,
Quote:
But did the investigators check whether she had actually thrown up
the account I saw had it that she "tried to throw up" which I took as she made the noises but nothing happened. I assume that this take is based upon her not flushing, bit whether she flushed or not is not said. Very very strange either way.
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 May, 2011 01:23 pm
@spendius,
Quote:
Yes--and that's the feminist's fault for picking this fight. None of that would have come about 50 years ago in anything resembling this case.


Of course it wouldn't have, Spendi. Actually, the feminists were shills for the lawyers and the PIs. They saw that if women were given even the slightest measure of protection against that portion of the male population that was truly sick, their services, and naturally their incomes, would rise exponentially.
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 May, 2011 01:24 pm
@hawkeye10,
Quote:
Throughout the questioning, the maid appeared traumatized, at one point going to a bathroom to try to vomit and several times spitting on the floor and walls of the suite, according to the sources.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2011-05-21/dominique-strauss-kahns-sexual-assault-case-what-happened/full/
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 23 May, 2011 01:28 pm
@hawkeye10,
Quote:
What I do know is that what ever women get it is never enough according to them. I think we see this clearly in the relentless and extensive driving downward the threshold of criminal sexual assault. The vast expansion of the penalty speaks to the vindictiveness of women, current sex crime penalties are what we get when women are allowed by men to wallow in this gender fault.


I love watching romance comedies from the 50s and taking note how the male lead would had ended up in jail facing all kinds of charges in the here and now.

One wonder how must womankind had gain by turning normal sexual/courtship interactions between the sexes into a legal land mine field for men.
hawkeye10
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 23 May, 2011 01:32 pm
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:

I love watching romance comedies from the 50s and taking note how the male lead would had ended up in jail facing all kinds of charges in the here and now.

One wonder how must womankind had gain by turning normal sexual/courtship interactions between the sexes into a legal land mine field for men.
How many years away are we do you figure from a government mandated warning statement each time these movies are played?? We might as well make explicit our contempt for past generations of men, right now it is the elephant in the room.
0 Replies
 
Irishk
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 May, 2011 01:33 pm
Oops

And blech. Blech, blech, blech.
BillRM
 
  -2  
Reply Mon 23 May, 2011 01:36 pm
@Irishk,
Quote:
And blech. Blech, blech, blech.


You should try to show more respect for Firefly.
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 23 May, 2011 01:48 pm
@hawkeye10,
A sure sign he is a rapist daring to made passes at women or so it is claimed.

Hell I flirt with Denny waitresses however that does not mean I cheat on my wife let alone would be willing to try to rape them.

Strange thinking that if a male act like a male and perhaps an unfaithful husband that somehow give greater credibility to the idea he would sexually attack a maid or any other woman for that matter.

A manner of thinking that Firefly had been trying to promote here on this thread as a matter of fact and now the New York Police Department it doing the same.

One wonder how the male police officers would react if they found themselves label as likely rapists for flirting with women or even trying to pick one up every now and then.


http://www.cnn.com/2011/BUSINESS/05/23/imf.chief/index.html?hpt=T2

New York (CNN) -- Former IMF chief Dominique Strauss-Kahn sought the company of two female hotel staffers after he checked into Manhattan's Sofitel Hotel one day before his alleged sexual assault on a maid May 14, according to a law enforcement source with knowledge of the investigation.

As a receptionist was personally escorting Strauss-Khan to his suite following check-in, he asked her to stay for some champagne, according to the source, but the receptionist told investigators she turned him down.

Later, according to the source, Strauss-Kahn called a different receptionist from his suite to ask if she would join him for a drink in his room after she got off duty. Like the first receptionist, she also declined the former IMF chief's invitation.

"She described it as flirtatious," the source, who asked for anonymity, told CNN Sunday.

The additional details are emerging from police interviews with hotel staff about contacts employees may have had with their prestigious guest prior to and following the alleged attack.

hawkeye10
 
  0  
Reply Mon 23 May, 2011 01:50 pm
@Irishk,
Quote:
Oops
Very strange to go through all that and not tell us if the DNA has been shown to belong to DSK.
spendius
 
  0  
Reply Mon 23 May, 2011 02:06 pm
@hawkeye10,
Quote:
Doesn't it read as the act of a woman who's beef is with the owner of the room, not the man who just vacated the room?


I don't know hawk. It might be an act of a woman demonstrating how utterly awful men taste. Which there have been hints of on here. Which is surprising when you consider Brantome's Gallant Ladies book in which he depicts his adored ones bringing the Guard of Honour into their rooms to breakfast on the stuff. I think Catherine the Great had some similar predilictions. Rich protein and facial applications are said to hold back the onset of crow's feet and greying.

Maybe we taste worse the lower down the social scale they are.

All in all I think it was gesture argument whoever or whatever the beef was with. I would imagine that even if he did grab her she's been acting ever since. After all it's not like having both legs and an arm blown off and being blinded. I bet a lot of things worse than being grabbed by DSK have happened in the USA just today.

His prestige is like heated drawing ointment.

0 Replies
 
roger
 
  3  
Reply Mon 23 May, 2011 02:12 pm
@hawkeye10,
Strange maybe, but is it important other than for the need to touch all bases? Your article does say the lawyer is going to argue there was consent. If that's their position, DNA results could almost be stipulated.

Quote:
By Henry Samuel, Paris 6:58PM BST 23 May 2011
46 Comments
The New York Police sent the test results to French authorities on Sunday where they allegedly confirmed the trace. The results are expected to be made public shortly.

Mr Strauss-Kahn, 62, who is accused of trying to rape a maid last week in his suite at the Sofitel hotel in New York, was released from Rikers Island jail on Friday.

His lawyer has already indicated he plans to argue that there was consent.

roger
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 May, 2011 02:14 pm
@ossobuco,
That's probably. I recalled his being somewhat more explict, but memory does that, sometimes.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  0  
Reply Mon 23 May, 2011 02:14 pm
@JTT,
Quote:
Of course it wouldn't have, Spendi. Actually, the feminists were shills for the lawyers and the PIs. They saw that if women were given even the slightest measure of protection against that portion of the male population that was truly sick, their services, and naturally their incomes, would rise exponentially.


And its leaders, the judges, jealous of their power, have the task of prospecting more and more territory for the lower ranks to develop and exploit.

I wish the horses were as predictable.

PS They are at it here. The judiciary versus the House of Commons on a Privacy Law. It's "ragin".
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.12 seconds on 12/25/2024 at 11:13:26