@BillRM,
Quote:
I think that her story that I know of made no sense for the reasons given
If her story made no sense, then you are saying it was not truthful.
Quote: therefore arresting the man and ruining his life without far more investigation is a great injustice.
If, according to you, her story made no sense, why should they have bothered to do "far more investigation"? Why investigate a complaint that makes no sense?
Somehow, I think detectives in the NYPD Special Victims Unit, who are extremely experienced in interviewing those making sexual assault complaints, and have a fairly good idea which accounts seem credible, and which don't, are in a much better position than you are to judge whether her story "made sense"--and they concluded it did. And they were also able to note her appearance, her demeanor, and her emotional state, and to note whether her body showed any signs of injury. And they likely heard her account in much greater detail than you have been privileged to read. You know only the bare bones description laid out in the criminal complaint--she no doubt told them a great deal more. She told them enough to convince them to arrest this man--and to arrest him quickly, before he left the country.
This man may have ruined his own life. The same way the former President of Israel ruined his.
He'll get a fair trial--his defense team will insure that. They don't care if he's guilty or not, they will do everything in their power to attack the evidence and the prosecution's witnesses and raise reasonable doubt. And, even if the hotel maid is telling the truth, Strauss-Kahn may still get off--that's what really good defense lawyers can do for a defendant.
I think they had adequate reason to arrest him and charge him. And, by the time this went to the grand jury, they already had some forensic evidence to present along with the hotel maid's testimony. But they still have to prove their case in court.
The trial will be interesting.