Is the Head of the IMF a Sex Criminal?

I notice you make no reference to the "staged performances" in NY ff.

BTW--Are there advertising breaks on the channel the interview took place on. 5 million extra viewers represents a fair wodge of dough in one way or another.

I think that a strict evolutionist would take the position that a refusal of sex to an offer from a female constitutes a "moral failure" justifying extreme forms of scorn despite it involving no violence, no constraint and no criminal act.

The matter is done and dusted and everything else seems to be resting on hot air.

As I have indicated for a bribe of a few thousand dollars to some of the employees now, it is known, you can disrupt the work of the global economic system, at least for a time.

While this charge is well founded in all the world is still aware that you can set up an international bureaucrat important for some money and effort if you want

No matter what men should not be in the power of a local police force with immunity to it and if it can demonstrate that there are reasons for these charges and immunity can be serous wave.

In this case, the Board of the IMF.

Agree 1,00000 percents and had made similar comments myself more then once on this thread.

but i say, **** the bureaucrats, set them up, convict them and execute them

problems solved

Feeling a bit expansive are you dj?

As an aside but related to feminism.

I can never see a female person reporting from a war-zone, presenting a football highlights programme, holding forth on the economic issues of the day or being indignant on our behalf concerning some despicable act, without thinking of Charles Lamb's admiring remarks about "the little sylph of Ullswater", Sara Coleridge, translating the 3 volumes of the Latin text of Martin Dobrizhoffer's describing the "Equestrian People of Paraguay".

He said that the beauteous and frail looking Sara had " Dobrizhoffered it all out . . .thro' that rugged Paraguay mine".

Sometimes I also call to mind Sam Johnson's wisecrack about a woman preaching.



Am I out of date or what ff?

Yes you are, judging women by a yardstick has been replaced with "women are wonderful" theory, that being that everything women do is wonderful. This is the corollary to the "men suck" theory, which again requires no measuring, as it is a given.

The issue, I think, is that you are more out of sync. Throughout this thread, you've raised lots of interesting questions, along with many provocative literary references, I can fully appreciate, and might be perfectly willing to discuss and pursue with you, but not in this particular thread, which is really about a rather prosaic sexual assault case that no one would have paid attention to if the man involved had not been an internationally known big-shot. While I admire your desire to move away from the mundane, I'm just not motivated to go in that direction, particularly in the context of this thread. Don't take it personally, spendi. Perhaps at another time, in another place...

this case not not in the least bit ordinary. Usually both the cops and the DA do a bit more work before going after people....usually bail is not set so high, usually house arrest is not allowed....usually DA's will not completely drop a case that they can not make, they need to get a pound of flesh during plea bargaining to save face or else they take a losing case to court and expand upon injustice......usually the injustice perpetrated by the state does not negatively impact so many people so much, as normally the negative impact does not mover much beyond family and friends.

All of that is untrue--you just are unfamiliar with NYC law enforcement and how other very high profile cases, or cases with a foreign national, have been handled. Nothing about this one was particularly out of the ordinary, except the ridiculously over-the-top international media coverage.

The week after DSK was arrested, an Egyptian banker was arrested for groping another maid in another hotel, and, had it not been for DSK, that one would have probably gone completely unnoticed by the public and unreported by the media--and it was resolved very quickly, with a guilty plea, which I believe was to a lessor charge.

For you this case was out of the ordinary, for those with a more objective perspective, it was just another he said/she said sexual assault case in a very big city D.A.'s office, which handles these sorts of cases all the time, which handles high profile cases all the time, and which routinely drops charges they feel they cannot prove beyond a reasonable doubt at trial. Other than the intense media scrutiny, and the obscene amounts of money spent on DSK's behalf, this one was business as usual--he was just another perp.

You are riding this plane into the ground Firefly.

Poor maid a religion woman, hard working and truthful victim of an old evil powerful white man.

Her good name being protected by good hearts lawyers doing it not for a chance of getting a large paid day but being knights in the serve of all womankind.

LOL............

Thank god Firefly it does not matter in the end if any of the nonsense you posted in the beginning of this thread have any connection with reality or not.

DSK is a man and all men are either rapists or would be rapists and once charge with the crime of rape by any woman a man is always to be assume to be guilty even if sadly there turn out to be no evidence needed convict him in a court of law.

If the woman who level the charges in the first placed is a proven liar and con woman it still does not matter as DSK after all was willing to cheat on his wife and is known as a man who had chase women so why question if he would be insane enough to just jump out of a shower and attack a maid at random.

Thank god once more that even if we can not prove the man is a rapist he still will never be able to clear his name as he is guilty at the very least of being a heterosexual male.

Has it ever struck you Bill that to be a heterosexual male it is necessary to think of women as being completely different from men. Any similarities and there is a sense of partaking in a degree of homosexualty. The mystery of the "other" is beginning to be diluted.

.

You have an interesting way of viewing the universe..........

Thomas de Quincey wrote, in The Confessions of an English Opium Eater,---



To a very great extent I think taking it too seriously, as Mr Vance was so eager to do for reasons it would be ridiculous to include a concern for the immigrant maid, destroys the charm. With ripped panty-hose, bruised vaginas and the emphatic expectorations of jism all over the walls and carpets of a high class hotel any charm or shades of beautiful caprice are utterly shredded.

It's anti-woman to the n'th degree.

Another rape in a soap. Coronation Street.

She and he are business partners and were going to be married. She pulled out of the marriage the day before the ceremony was due to take place and they had been living together for months.

Anyway--it's a load of bullshit obviously but it once again provided a tutorial on how to act the rape victim when no rape has happened as it obviously hasn't on a TV studio set.

One feature of the act was a fast flight reflex from other men, even her best friend who had been helping her fight alcoholism. He moved to comfort her and she jumped back as if she had got a shock off the electricity mains. Hysterical screaming as well and feeling dirty all over. The actress playing the part would easily have convinced Vance.

The investigating officer is female.

What's interesting is which type of characters in the show have already found the bloke guilty.

A few weeks ago this lady, when pissed out of her mind, crashed her car into a shop window after mowing down another character who is in intensive care. (Which means the actress in the part is demanding better wages). The "perp", and we are led to believe that he did give her one although the camera was panned to an open window at the time, was sober in the passenger seat and switched places with her and told the cops he was driving. So, at great risk to himself, he saved her from three years, or more if the other actress is fired and carks it in the hospital.

Nearly 20,000,000 viewers are addicted to this stuff and they are nearly all women. The main guy who runs the show is a homosexual in real life.

You should keep your eyes open to this sort of thing lads because stuff can creep up on you if you don't. It's the Open University don't you know? It's no good treating women who have been watching 4 episodes a week of that for many years as sane.

It is no good trying to talk about facts with young men and women who have all their lives been the subject of the indoctrination that rape is an epidemic and that men suck.....we might as well be in Salem Mass during 1692 trying to claim that there is no such thing as witches because we have no evidence that there are witches......such is a lost cause.

Yes and this nonsense is being sold at the same time that reported rape is at a 33 years low.

According to the official theological definition of a witch there are many times more of them now than there ever was in the past.

Obviously, those silly sods who think a witch is a haggled-toothed crone riding around the skies on a broomstick whilst laughing and shrieking fiendishly after curdling all the milk are unaware of that simple fact. But that is because they have been indoctrinated by fairy stories rather than any scientific facts which are written in the record.



Bob Dylan. Changing of the Guards.

And they have done a pretty good job of curdling all the banks.