Is the Head of the IMF a Sex Criminal?

That works out at thirty odd pounds a pop. I know you don't like the working classes appearing in your favourite eating establishment, perhaps we should all stick to fish and chips on a park bench.

That's very kind of you Spendi. It's such a relief knowing that a push I can always send the kids to dine with their strange 'Uncle' Spendi. It's not just a meal, it's also a cautionary tale.

BTW, Bob Crowe is democratically elected by his members, they can always kick him out. The meal you mentioned is an annual event, how about a quotation on the daily excesses of Cameron's bullingdon days? You're grasping at straws when you have to quote the Daily Mail.

It's not so much what was done. It was being seen doing it. Like Scargill's Jag.

I'll bet that as these leaders of the workers strolled into the place they felt the fat-cat glow suffusing their being. I've met those sort of guys in my politically active days. They are into the punctilios of rank and position as much as any princess.

BTW--The (ex) Head of the IMF is not a sex criminal. It's official.

It may be official, but it's not a fact.

Strange how rank and file members of the Union don't get upset about it though, just readers of the Daily Mail.

Is the Mail still running the essay competition? 'What I like most about the blackshirts....'

Let see where and I repeat where did I defend rape/torture/child porn?

Willing adults all entering into and filming SM behaviors of their own free will or having such videos should be none of the damn society business.

Real videos of real rape or real torture is another animal of another color just as a movie showing an reenactment of a blooded murder scene is not the same as the showing a real life murder. I do not wish to see someone being send to prison for having a copy of the Texas chain saw murders for example.

I had also defend the right of a late teen girl to send a sexual picture of herself to her boyfriend without fear of either one of them being charge with child porn.

Oh I also did suggest that we should be better off in the US if we used the same grading system as the UK and not punish people the same for having pictures of late teenagers willingly engaging in sex as someone who had picture videos of infants being rape.

You are a sick sick mother indeed if you view teenagers sharing such pictures with child rape/child porn or adults willingly taking part in SM games as the same as real rape being film

I don't know. I don't waste my team reading newspapers. You seem to know more about the rag than I do.

In fact I find it very strange that the society see nothing wrong with showing unreal violence in great and convicting details but add a sexual element of any kind to the mixed and the UK government now wish to send people to prison for having such materials.

Yet it is not uncommon for both men and women to get turn on by rape fantasies.

Are you turned on by the fantasy of being raped by another man?

Is that why this topic appeals to you so much?

I think that may be the case, and he calls me sick.

What is your definition of 'late teen?' How can you ensure the 'late teen' isn't being groomed by a paedophile?

Dear heart I am not turned on by any rape fantasy but that still does not imply that there is anything wrong or evil with the men and women that are turn on by such fantasies.

Off hand I do not remember what the accepted numbers are for women who do get turn on by rape fantasies however it is not a small percents of the total female population.

So it is your position that women who do enjoy such fantasies are sick and in need of treatment Firefly?

Lord so we charge the girl with manufactoring child porn for taking pictures of herself if she is being groom by an evil paedophile?

In any case I been talking about cases where it is legal for the girl below 18 to have sex with her partner but not for them to have sexaul pictures of each other.

That is crazy in any sane universe.

In the US the age of consent is all over the place depending on the state but the age can be many years before her 18 years birthday.

In Florida the age of consent also depend on the age of her partner where a male below the age of 22 or so can have sex with a girl under the age of 18 years but not an old man such as myself.

So Firefly are 40 percents of all women sexaul preverts in need of treatment in your opinion?

http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/all-about-sex/201001/womens-rape-fantasies-how-common-what-do-they-mean

From 1973 through 2008, nine surveys of women's rape fantasies have been published. They show that about four in 10 women admit having them (31 to 57 percent) with a median frequency of about once a month. Actual prevalence of rape fantasies is probably higher because women may not feel comfortable admitting them.

For the latest report (Bivona, J. and J. Critelli. "The Nature of Women's Rape Fantasies: An Analysis of Prevalence, Frequency, and Contents," Journal of Sex Research (2009) 46:33), psychologists at North Texas University asked 355 college women: How often have you fantasized being overpowered/forced/raped by a man/woman to have oral/vaginal/anal sex against your will?

Sixty-two percent said they'd had at least one such fantasy. But responses varied depending on the terminology used. When asked about being "overpowered by a man," 52 percent said they'd had that fantasy, the situation most typically depicted in women's romance fiction. But when the term was "rape," only 32 percent said they'd had the fantasy. These findings are in the same ballpark as previous reports.

Frequency of rape fantasies varied substantially. Thirty-eight percent of respondents never had them. Of those who did, 25 percent reported such fantasies less than once a year. Thirteen percent had them a few times a year, 11 percent once a month, 8 percent once a week, and 5 percent several times a week. (Twenty-one percent of the respondents said they'd been sexually assaulted in real life.)

Rape fantasies can be either erotic or aversive. In erotic fantasies, the woman thinks: "I'm being forced and I enjoy it." In aversive fantasies, she thinks: "I'm being forced and I hate it." Forty-five-percent of the women in the recent survey had fantasies that were entirely erotic. Nine percent were entirely aversive. And 46 percent were mixed.

Rape or near-rape fantasies are central to romance novels, one of the perennial best-selling categories in fiction. These books are often called "bodice-rippers" and have titles like Love's Sweet Savage Fury, which imply at least some degree of force. In them, a handsome cad becomes so overwhelmed by his attraction to the heroine that he loses all control and must have her, even if she refuses--which she does initially, but then eventually melts into submission, desire, and ultimately fulfillment.

Romance novels are often called "porn for women." Porn is all about sexual fantasies. In porn for men, the fantasy is sexual abundance--eager women who can't get enough and have no interest in a relationship. In porn for women as depicted in romance novels, the fantasy is to be desired so much that the man loses all control, though he never actually hurts the woman, and in the end, marries her.

I am much to polite to have asked you that question ff in so bald a fashion despite my suspicion from the start that it was your reason too. In fact I think that the whole female obsession with rape is motivated by a fascination with bodice ripping and uncouth, virile males being uncouth and virile.

I think the maid was bragging about her stimulating effect on males being an irresistable force of nature. Obviously she needed to fake being mortified and humiliated because bragging outright about that is considered unseemly and dysempthatic.

Being able to distract half the world with talk of one's pussy power must be the absolute epitome of feminine satisfaction.

It's a sign of desperation in argument Bill when paediwhatsits are brought forth as a clincher.

The whole of the Christian tradition and the Roman Catholic Church is often declared to be evil on the basis of a few of them.

When the Pope visited Britain the coverage went on all day and during that time Ms Anna Botting on Sky News referred to "child sex abuse" so many times (hundreds) that it became quite obvious she is obsessed by the matter.

I have no doubt but that is part of the reason the selling of the rape scare has been a resounding success....it is mostly about power after all, and the power of allure is part of that. Being told that at any time a man might lose his mind and take you, even in the most disgusting places, even though if he gets caught he will be locked away for a very long time, has got to make women feel an intoxicating mixture of fear and power.

You mean Hawkeye that is the real reason why Firefly is so center on the subject of rape by evil men? Why she love made up numbers that place the risk of being a victim a few hundreds time greater then it happen to be?

It would certainly intoxicate me but alas I'm in the down on my knees position.

I thought ff talked it up as good as a wine taster talks up the vintage. They daren't sound enthusiastic because we might start charging them. So thrumming indignation is deployed. The main thing is to be talking about it acceptably.

Consent is when the payment of the charge is deemed sufficient.

I dont know Firefly, but there is a very high probability that she is attracted to ravishment by a brute. The only other good explanation, that she has been warped by abuse, she denies....