9
   

Is the Head of the IMF a Sex Criminal?

 
 
joefromchicago
 
  1  
Reply Mon 12 Sep, 2011 09:09 am
@hawkeye10,
hawkeye10 wrote:
"We ask that Dominique Strauss-Kahn is not visible for the next election, since it is not white,

Machine translations are the funny.
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Mon 12 Sep, 2011 09:23 am
@joefromchicago,
joefromchicago wrote:

hawkeye10 wrote:
"We ask that Dominique Strauss-Kahn is not visible for the next election, since it is not white,

Machine translations are the funny.
they are good enough to get the main point, for instance here

Quote:
since there will be a trial and other women are gradually complaint against him
we know the argument is that DSK should stay out of public life because of the assertion that he abuses women and it is only a matter of time before the feminists can prove it. REALLY? Who are these women? DSK has been all over the global news all summer and yet all we have coming forwards is one female who has been telling stories for almost a decade about how DSK got a little frisky with her once, and her mother who now says that yes she banged DSK (multiple times) but that he likes it a little more rough than she does and so he is a bad man. That did not stop her from going back for more though, which indicates to me that the legendary DSK charm works pretty damn well.


EDIT: "since it is not white" should have been translated "since he is not bleached" which Americans would put "since he is not innocent".....but since we can figure this out from the computer translation do we really need a human for the job anymore? My wife the speaker of five languages says yes, but I am not convinced.
joefromchicago
 
  2  
Reply Mon 12 Sep, 2011 09:37 am
@hawkeye10,
hawkeye10 wrote:
EDIT: "since it is not white" should have been translated "since he is not bleached" which Americans would put "since he is not innocent"

No. The computer got it wrong the first time, since blanchi isn't "white," it's the past participle of blanchir, so it would be "whitened." A better translation would be "since he has not been cleared [of the charges]." And no, you can't get that from a computer translation that says "since it is not white." That's just gibberish.

hawkeye10 wrote:
.....but since we can figure this out from the computer translation do we really need a human for the job anymore? My wife the speaker of five languages says yes, but I am not convinced.

Your wife is right.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Mon 12 Sep, 2011 09:51 am
@hawkeye10,
Quote:
said Nelly Martin, spokesman for the World March of Women.


There you go then. John Knox's "Monstrous Regiment of Women" brought into the 21st century.

I presume "spokesman" is a low jest.

"Get thee to a nunnery". (Hamlet).


spendius
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Sep, 2011 05:08 pm
@spendius,
Our Conservative coalition government, would you believe, has just announced a raft of policies to suck up to the female vote and that section of the male vote that is henpecked all to ****.

One of them is to shorten the school holidays presumably so that concentrating on ceiling busting is easier.

As a long time supporter of extending the school holidays you can imagine how utterly disgusted I am. One might think that the logic would run to avoiding having kids altogether.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Sep, 2011 05:59 pm
@spendius,
That would be good for single dads as well, but you're too wrapped up in your own rhetoric to see that.
BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Sep, 2011 08:55 pm
@izzythepush,
Quote:
That would be good for single dads as well, but you're too wrapped up in your own rhetoric to see that.


Less time to bond with your children is good for both single Dads and mothers?

Why have kids in the first place?

My parents took me to all kind of interesting places during school holidays.

Not to mention all the hours I spend under foot in my grandfather workshop.

Hell to this day 55 years later I still get tears in my eyes when I enter a carpentry shop and smell saw dust in the air as it bring me back to those happy times.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 Sep, 2011 01:21 am
@BillRM,
I don't need any lessons on parenting from you.
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 Sep, 2011 01:31 am
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:

I don't need any lessons on parenting from you.
I have never seen any indication that you are open to learning anything from anyone.......
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 Sep, 2011 02:50 am
@hawkeye10,
I have learnt quite a bit on this forum, there are some quite smart contributors. You're not one of them. However, you and Bill are demonstrating the sort of bigotry and prejudice single dads like myself have to deal with every day.
BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 Sep, 2011 03:23 am
@izzythepush,
.
Quote:
However, you and Bill are demonstrating the sort of bigotry and prejudice single dads like myself have to deal with every day.


LOL you are correct I am surely in no position to question your judgment that your children would be better off spending less time in your company.

Silly silly........person!!!!!!!
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 Sep, 2011 03:24 am
@BillRM,
Work/life balance. My kids need to eat.
BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 Sep, 2011 03:49 am
@izzythepush,
So did I and so did my parents and grandparents and all the adults worked long hours.

Still they found all the time in the world to spend with me as in my grandfather being willing to have me under foot in his shop and my father doing such things as driving to his job on his day off and allowing me to move railroad engines back and forth in the freight yard.

Or my mother coming home from working as a clerk and spending hours helping me with my homework assignments.

Or the family driving long distances to get me to a wonderful second hand book store or.....................

izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 Sep, 2011 03:55 am
@BillRM,
Don't lecture me on how much time I spend with my kids. They are doing very well, my daughter has just got a place at a Russell Group University. I think it's very ironic that someone so obsessively concerned with the freedom of perverts to watch shocking images of torture, and sex-offenders to rape with impunity, could think they had anything meaningful to say about the welfare of children.
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 Sep, 2011 03:58 am
@izzythepush,
But can you not see izzy that the trend to starting school at 3 and these shorter school holidays are making them less and less your kids, except biologically. And maternity ward mix-ups and adoption show that the biological aspect is unimportant compared to the social.

Your kids will always be able to eat.

My rhetoric, as you call it, was merely expressing surprise that a Conservative government should be introducing the measures. It wouldn't have surprised me from a Labour government which has members in favour of nurseries from birth.

Your rhetoric has blinded you from seeing that that was my point. The "world march" of the monstrous regiment of women has embraced all three of our political parties.

Everybody knows why mothers want to work. It is because the man in their life cannot earn enough to keep them in the manner advertising has indoctrinated them to wish to become accustomed to. Cars, clothes, holidays etc. They only pay sentimental lip service to the welfare of kids.

And by working they reduce men's wages in exactly the same way that immigrants reduce wages.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 Sep, 2011 04:02 am
@spendius,
Despite all these propositions the main influence is the parent. I like taking my kids on holiday, they like it too. It's nothing to do with advertising and peer pressure. The only monstrous woman I've seen in Parliament recently is Nadine Dorries.
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 Sep, 2011 04:28 am
@izzythepush,
You're talking about a piece of flotsam landing on the beach. I'm talking about the wave that washed it up.
izzythepush
 
  2  
Reply Wed 14 Sep, 2011 05:52 am
@spendius,
It's not women who are driving down wages, but the rapacious greed of the boardroom.
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 Sep, 2011 06:08 am
@izzythepush,
Oh dear!!
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 Sep, 2011 06:12 am
@spendius,
Quote:
£10,000 feast at a top hotel for 300 senior trade unionists washed down with fine wine
By Andrew Pierce

Last updated at 8:55 AM on 14th September 2011

RMT leader Bob Crow has warned of civil disobedience
Hours after threatening the biggest campaign of civil disobedience in the nation’s history, 300 senior trade unionists tucked into a lavish banquet at an exclusive London hotel.
No expense was spared at the venue: 8 Northumberland Avenue, off Trafalgar Square, which is Madonna’s favourite hotel in the capital.
It cost the unions £10,000 just to hire two rooms and thousands more for a drinks reception followed by a four-course dinner also attended by much of the Shadow Cabinet.
For starters, the choice was grilled vegetables and focaccia croutons or truffled potato and leek terrine.
The main course was pot-roasted chicken breast with chestnut mushrooms and leeks in crisp puff pastry while dessert was caramelised apple tatin.
The dishes were washed down with copious quantities of fine wine and Ed Balls, the Shadow Chancellor, delivered a rousing speech.



 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 02/12/2025 at 04:02:16