@BillRM,
Quote:We seems to getting off the point that there is zero indication that DSK had broken any laws
What you don't understand is that this man's behavior toward women is often reprehensible, even when it stops short of being criminal. You seem to have no regard for how women are treated and you are willing to excuse any behavior that is not downright criminal.
Then you should excuse Diallo also--she was not found guilty of making false accusations against him, despite other lies she might have told. Stop bitching about how men are treated by women since you seem to have little regard for how women are treated by men.
A man who cannot treat women in an appropriate manner does not belong in a position of power where he must work with women, and interact with female representatives of other countries--and DSK had problems with this as head of the IMF and he would likely have had considerable problems as President of France for similar reasons. When women are uncomfortable being alone in a room with him--as many have said they were--the man has significant problems with self control and with his attitude toward women. The reports of his harassing and aggressive and unwanted advances toward women are numerous, and simply because these behaviors might not be criminal, or have as yet resulted in criminal convictions, does not make these behaviors acceptable or tolerable or even defensible--particularly in a man who holds a position of power or public trust.
The latest polls in France show that 53% of the population do not want him to return to politics. Among women that percentage might well be higher. Even without a criminal conviction, what has already been revealed about this man's unacceptable behaviors toward women discredits him in the minds of a great many people in his own country. People can, and should, and do, make their own moral judgments about his actions, and about his reputation, and, even in France, he has crossed the line in the opinion of many--including those who are prominent leaders of his own Socialist party.
And his loss to the IMF is likely to be very minimal. He has no gifts as an economist which are unique to him. He had a reputation as being something of a figurehead at the IMF because he apparently doesn't like to work all that hard, and, for that reason, there was also a concern about how involved he would actually be in any upcoming presidential election, or even with the presidency of France if he had gained it. His wife seems to have been the one pushing him toward the presidency, for her own reasons.
The irony of this entire situation is that DSK's poor behavior toward women has indirectly resulted in having the first female head of the IMF. I suspect that she will take issues of sexual harassment in that organization much more seriously than he did.