9
   

Is the Head of the IMF a Sex Criminal?

 
 
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Sun 3 Jul, 2011 02:09 am
@hawkeye10,
Quote:

Allegations that she worked as a hotel hooker may explain why Strauss-Kahn insists their encounter was consensual.

High Seas posted that crap from the N.Y. Post a few pages back. Is your memory failing, Hawkeye? Possibly a side-effect of your over-use of Viagra? Laughing

That smear campaign, about the maid being a prostitute, is an obviously planted, completely unsubstantiated story, clearly "leaked" by DSK's defense team to attempt to discredit her even more in the public mind--which is why the story is in the rag sheet NY Post and not in a more reputable newspaper which would actually try to verify the accusations before printing something like that.

False accusations are fine, right, Hawkeye--as long as they are directed against a woman who alleges she was the victim of a sexual assault.

Well, since you trust the NY Post so much, you must also agree with their view of DSK--they call him, "Le Perv".
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Sun 3 Jul, 2011 02:13 am
@firefly,
Quote:
That smear campaign, about the maid being a prostitute, is an obviously planted,
Why obviously? It has been one of the top theories of what happened all along, and the information presented by the state to the court is consistent with this theory being the correct one.
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Sun 3 Jul, 2011 02:18 am
@hawkeye10,
Quote:
Yes you did, you said that you would not be happy until the conviction rate is 100%, you said this while bitching that the conviction rate is far too low for your liking.

Find the quote where I said I wanted to see a 100% conviction rate.

When I read your posts I'm starting to hear the "Twilight Zone" music playing in the background. Laughing Not that I think you're disconnected from reality...
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Sun 3 Jul, 2011 02:30 am
@firefly,
I am not going to search though 8,000+ posts to find it....people either saw it or they did not, I dont feel the need to prove what you said. Your support of the state and claims of the state have been constant and consistent though many threads, you cant run away from your position now.
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Sun 3 Jul, 2011 02:32 am
@hawkeye10,
Quote:
As I said, you are not interested in the truth, only in the perpetuation of your fantasies.

And as I said, provide some proper, official government-approved statistical evidence & I might take your claims more seriously.
In the meantime, your claims cannot be taken as credible on the very limited basis of what has been provided here.
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Sun 3 Jul, 2011 02:33 am
@hawkeye10,
Quote:
Why obviously? It has been one of the top theories of what happened all along, and the information presented by the state to the court is consistent with this theory being the correct one.

No, the state presented absolutely no information to discredit the maid's report of a sexual assault by DSK.

Find me the quote where the state indicated that the maid also worked as a prostitute at the Sofitel hotel, or anywhere else for that matter.

You're about as credible as you think the hotel maid is. You make up "facts" as you go along.

The maid may be a flawed witness at trial, but, thus far, there is no evidence to support the contention that she lied about being sexually assaulted by DSK.

You have a real double standard when it comes to making false allegations.
BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Sun 3 Jul, 2011 02:34 am
@firefly,
Given that she seems to be a banker for low level drug dealers how is being a hooker worst in any way or a smear on her seemingly nonexistent good character Firefly.
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Sun 3 Jul, 2011 02:41 am
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:

Given that she seems to be a banker for low level drug dealers how is being a hooker worst in any way or a smear on her seemingly nonexistent good character Firefly.
DSK and the hotel management company interests are aligned, I am sure that the hotel now has enough information to document her violations of the code of conduct..... I expect that she will be fired by the end of the week. There is no longer any incentive to continuing to pay her to sit on her ass, and she clearly can never again be allowed contact with the guests.

Keep in mind though that we are hearing that she in involved in multiple criminal acts, drugs, prostitution, and mob activity against people from her homeland.....if any of these claims are true then they will not be difficult to document.
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Sun 3 Jul, 2011 02:42 am
@hawkeye10,
Quote:
I dont feel the need to prove what you said

You should feel the need to prove it when you're the one making outrageous claims about what I've said. That you can't prove it exposes how you lie...and lie...and lie...

I support the current sexual assault laws. As most people do.

Do you get hot and sweaty under your white sheet with the pointy hood when you wear your tin foil hat underneath it?
BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Sun 3 Jul, 2011 02:42 am
@msolga,
Quote:
And as I said, provide some proper, official government-approved statistical evidence & I might take your claims more seriously.
In the meantime, your claims cannot be taken as credible on the very limited basis of what has been provided here.


Interesting thinking you have no need to support your position in any way or in any manner however if we take the time to bury you under facts you might reconsider your stand.

A stand that seem to come from empty air with no need for any support by you as you are right by default unless bury under facts and maybe not even then.

Woman you have a strange way of dealing with the world.
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Sun 3 Jul, 2011 02:44 am
@firefly,
Quote:
support the current sexual assault laws. As most people do


Most people do not have a clue what those laws had been turn into over the last decade or so in many states until it bit someone they care about.
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Sun 3 Jul, 2011 02:47 am
@hawkeye10,
Quote:
DSK and the hotel management company interests are aligned, I am sure that the hotel now has enough information to document her violations of the code of conduct..... I expect that she will be fired by the end of the week. There is no longer any incentive to continuing to pay her to sit on her ass, and she clearly can never again be allowed contact with the guests.

How has she violated any "code of conduct" related to her employment?

Has she been convicted of any crimes yet?

This is your idea of "justice"? Rolling Eyes

What a hypocrite you are.
BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Sun 3 Jul, 2011 02:47 am
@hawkeye10,
Quote:
DSK and the hotel management company interests are aligned


Hawkeye they surely did not do a great deal of screening of their employees and I wonder if they even did a criminal background check at all!!!!!!!

0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Sun 3 Jul, 2011 02:50 am
@ossobuco,
Quote:
I'm not much interested in christianity, however much it grips you, Spendius, and I've a life long lack of interest in economics and nothing to show for it, cough.


Christianity has you in a much tighter grip than it has me osso. If I had been advising you at 16 you would probably be a pagan enchantress.
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Sun 3 Jul, 2011 02:51 am
@firefly,
Quote:
How has she violated any "code of conduct" related to her employment?


As one of the hotel employee told DSK in the news stories she could not come up to his room for "drinks" as she would be fired for doing so.

If the sex was in fact consensus that is and of itself a firing offense and somehow I would not wish a low level criminal as she seems to be dealing with my guest either.

A small time banker for drug dealers is not the kind of employee I would wish working for me and being around super rich guests.

In any case there seem no question she lied under oath and that is also should be ground for letting her go.
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Sun 3 Jul, 2011 02:51 am
@firefly,
Quote:
Has she been convicted of any crimes yet
One does not need to be convicted of a crime to be released from employment for cause, even in the North on a Union job. Certainly you are not so ignorant as to not know this....
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Sun 3 Jul, 2011 03:03 am
@BillRM,
Quote:

Most people do not have a clue what those laws had been turn into over the last decade or so in many states until it bit someone they care about.

Right. Everyone else is stupid and uninformed except you and Hawkeye.

So, why do you constantly complain about college students being reminded about what those laws say, and about rape awareness campaigns that remind the public of the wording and content of the laws? Sounds like people are very much made aware of the laws--which shoots down your theory of general ignorance about them. But logic has never been your strong suit. Laughing
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Sun 3 Jul, 2011 03:06 am
@firefly,
Quote:
Maureen Dowd has the right fix on it.


Her sub editor does. "Collide". Like I said--an accident. A conjunction in time and space.
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Sun 3 Jul, 2011 03:20 am
@firefly,
Quote:
Right. Everyone else is stupid and uninformed except you and Hawkeye.

So, why do you constantly complain about college students being reminded about what those laws say, and about rape awareness campaigns that remind the public of the wording and content of the laws? Sounds like people are very much made aware of the laws--which shoots down your theory of general ignorance about them. But logic has never been your strong suit.


Posters with handcuffs might be your idea of how to teach about a complex law but it is not mine and for far less money then spend in such silliness you could get a law professor to give a short lecture to the incoming students on that subject and a few more legal subjects likely thrown in that would not be so insulting to every male on campus.

Of course a law professor would likely give the student the correct information not a woman study program version of the law.

PS sane sexual assault laws should not be complex but in those states where your side is winning and placing the burden of sexual intercourse on the male alone that is even more reason why they should be told by an expert not by
a propaganda poster what the law happen to be.
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Sun 3 Jul, 2011 03:22 am
@firefly,
Quote:
Sounds like people are very much made aware of the laws--which shoots down your theory of general ignorance about them. But logic has never been your strong suit
In the rape thread we linked to multiple studies that showed that huge numbers (over 40%) of college aged women who have been legally raped either claim that they have not been raped or that they are partly responsible for the rape thus using the law to hurt their sex partner would not be fair....as you well know, but then honesty has never been your strong suit. Nor has documentation of your assertions.

Here is one from me, not that I will ever get one from you, naturally.

Quote:
In the study, only 24.7 percent of the females and 12.5 percent of the males who experienced forced sex labeled it as rape, said the report authored by Thomas Brigham, Gretal Liebniz and Samantha Swindell of WSU.
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/education/2002757854_webwsu23.html
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 09/22/2024 at 10:22:45