Is the Head of the IMF a Sex Criminal?

Only to those who feel the need to indulge their fantasies. It works both ways, guys like women who are deceitful and gals like bad boys, it boils down to the same thing, which is why women tend to be deceitful and men tend to be bad boys......IT TENDS TO BE SUCCESSFUL IN BAGGING THE OPPOSITE SEX! This is not a matter of women losing, or of men losing, the only losers are those who have an fantasy version of humanity, which used to to by primarily the Bible thumpers but now unfortunately includes a lot more folks. ...they who run around telling other people what to do when they clearly dont have the first ******* clue what they are talking about.

I blame the failure of the education system.

You have to laugh hawk!! Hair styles and dye, make-up, up-lift bras and corsets, hosiery and high-heel shoes are all deceit.



And when there are a few million 'ology majors who can hardly read or write deceit and deviousness have reached economically destabilising proportions. (see financial crisis of 2008).

I refer interested readers to Thorstein Veblen's The Theory of the Leisure Class, The Higher Learning in America and his two short essays The Barbarian Status of Women and The Economic Theory of Women's Dress.

I asked a lady I know how much of the High Street is given over to female deceit and she offered "90%". When they run out of territory to practice deceit upon they get a poodle and use that to get rid of the surplus desire.

And now some men are getting going with it. Or, as Veblen expressed it, those who go under the crude biological definition of men.



One only need see a lady coming out of the bathroom with no clothes on and then view her 3 hours later meeting the Lord Mayor. She even alters her diction depending upon who she is talking to.

pan's problem is that he thinks he has women taped and can't admit that they are running a number on him. It calls into question his intelligence you see. He's a serious misogynist.

hawk--what was that stuff about a penis brushing the lips? It seems it's as serious a felony as a deep throater. But the report about it, ff's I think, has started making me suspicious. Was that the allegation or was it just a rumour put about by certain newspapers in order to tittivate their readers? When one thinks of all the important things that are not in newspapers because they don't tittivate the reader's prurience it's pretty obvious that the editors actually think that rumours of such perversions do tittivate the readers.

Obviously, on a matter of such delicacy it is DSK's word against that of the skivvy. But it has struck me that if it actually is as serious a felony as a deep throater then the skivvy gets the money without actually having been subjected to the latter and her honour remains nearly intact depending upon how light a brush on the lips it was.

IDK, there were reports that he came in her mouth and she spit it out, which is why they were ripping up carpet for DNA testing. From this one assumes that he had his dick in her mouth for awhile, and that she did not bite him to get him out. However, those reports could be wrong. The idea the she fell and he came up to her and essentually only jacked off on her, but touching her lips thus the government feels free to charge him for what in essence is rape of her mouth, rings true to me. That would make this a case where the state is going after a 25 year prison term for jacking off on a female where the consent is muddled, which sounds right for the American "justice" system.

If true I am not sure how this swings, the jury could say that it is more likely that she did not consent than under the other version of what happened, but on the other hand very little happened to her so the state comes off as over reaching with their "this is a VERY VERY serious felony offense!" bit, DSK has been treated very harshly by the state for maybe a year at that point, so they might just go with the lowest charge, which is a three month prison penalty, of which he will have done several times over. The payday in the civil suit goes down as well, because her showing harm boils down to claims of emotional trauma for getting cum on her, which is why she cant work anymore, to which the normal American response is "get a life".

Another example of a high profile male and his friends being set up on rape charges.

With his future in the major league already been greatly harmed.

This time it look likely that the father of the one accuser was behind this plot.

Oh the Herald is still shielding the name of the accuser. It is nice of them not to allow others young men to be placed on notice about her.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



BY ADAM H. BEASLEY
[email protected]
Garrett Wittels’ high-profile legal nightmare is coming to an end.

Prosecutors announced in Bahamian court Wednesday that rape charges filed against Wittels, FIU’s star shortstop, and friends Robert Rothschild and Jonathan Oberti will be dropped Monday, his lawyer Richard Sharpstein told The Miami Herald.

Wittels and his friends were accused last December of sexually assaulting two 17-year-old American girls while partying at the Atlantis Paradise Island resort.

But authorities apparently decided the evidence gathered did not warrant proceeding with the case, which garnered national attention as it came amid Wittels’ failed pursuit of the NCAA hitting streak record.

Wittels’ father, local physician Michael Wittels, said he was made aware of the development, but declined further comment.

Wittels recently finished his junior season at FIU, but was not among the hundreds of high school and collegiate prospects chosen in last week’s Major League Baseball draft.

“The enormous and drastic effect this had on Garrett Wittels and his career can never be compensated,” Sharpstein said.

It is The Miami Herald’s policy not to make public the names of sexual assault accusers, but the controversial past of one of the accusers’ fathers may have played a factor.

Several years ago, he reportedly planned to hire a woman to falsely claim she was raped at a professional sporting event. The sport’s governing body also accused him of plotting to use actors to stage a racially charged fight in the stands in order to paint the fan base as hostile to minorities in a film he was making.Efforts to reach justice officials in the Bahamas were not immediately successful Wednesday afternoon. The charges will not formally be dropped until the lead prosecutor signs off on the paperwork. Wittels, Rothschild and Oberti will likely need to be present for Monday’s final hearing, Sharpstein said..

Miami Herald correspondent Siobhan Morrissey contributed to this report.



Read more: http://www.miamiherald.com/2011/06/16/2268241/wittels-rape-case-to-be-dropped.html#ixzz1Q0YL33Cd

The problem Bill is Ladymedia. That stuff is inevitable once the circumstances exist for it to thrive. Have you seen them on Bloomberg and Fox.

There was one on Fox the other night in a shimmering green sack who said "And now a special Fox feechewer". Then a video about 3 minutes was shown about how Americans are so compassionate and caring. The sack reappeared to say "That was a Fox special feechewer. Thanks for watching." Cut to some guy talking macho.

We have one who covers the football with her tits half out, short skirt, and crossing and recrossing her admittedly divine hindlegs.

They have been kept out of cricket though. And I'm dying to see one try commentating on the Royal Hunt Cup.

Do you think some men talk macho to compensate for how much under the cosh they are at home?

I have personal experience of that sort of thing. When I was in primary school, I was about 6 or 7 at the time, I changed schools at 8, two girls accused me of stealing bird's eggs from a nest near where they lived. One of them stood up in assembly and said "please miss, spendi stole our little thrush's eggs from an 'edge where I live" and the other one jumped up and shouted accusingly " 'e did too miss, I saw 'im. I was mortified. Everybody was staring at me. And I knew I hadn't. So I denied it. I had never been anywhere near their hedge. Ever. It was in a low class district which bordered on the estate I lived on.

But they all carried on staring at me. You could have heard a pin drop. I was centre forward for the school football team and held the long-jump record. I often pass the school as I wend my way through this weary world of woe so I might pop in one day and see if it still stands.

Unbeknownst to me at the time the headmistress was an ornithologist. And was that sniffy, nosey-parker type who likes investigating things. She wore sussies too. I often think now that sitting on the front row as I did is what has led me to the state I'm in now. My obsession with frilly silks and elasticated straps might be traced back to those afternoons when she took us for Religious Instruction, which I was top at, and I could see under the desk she sat at as she taught us The Way of the Lord. That probably led me to sitting opposite my mum's best friend when she was reading the Madhouse Evening Post with arms outstretched in a low armchair.

So I got further questioning. I was too young to be aware that assertions were not worth a blow on a ragman's snotrag. But my denials were enough for her to question the girls. If they had seen me, as they said, then they must have an idea of the time of day. And at that time I had been helping the Parish Priest catch rabbits. And his housekeeper made lovely pies. So I was absolved and the girls just said "well we thought it was spendi".

With the passing years of wide experience of the female sex and concentrated reading in those authors who specialise in delimiting the feminine nature I now realise that it was because I hadn't been paying them any attention which I must admit that it had never entered my head to do.

But they swore on God's Holy Bible, cross their fingers and hope to die that I had robbed that bird's nest. And everybody believed them.

Maybe the NY powers that be are accustomed to little tweeting turtle doves in pretty gilded cages as their picture of the feminine nature. Or faking it for money and fun.

I know that there's a very, very, very, very serious felony involved in the case here but it's fun alright.

A good illustration of the problem with the claim that women rarely lie, and with the demand that individual women who claim sexual assault must be believed and that to challange their claims is to abuse them (further of course, as their claim of original abuse is to be taken as fact).

But you know as well as I spendius that you and I pointing out such facts on how women often behave only proves that we hate women. *sarcasm*

It's nothing really hawk. I assume they are like that when their interest is engaged.

Remind me sometime to tell you the tale of my doctor's wife. I have to go to the pub shortly.

BTW--Do you know why smoking is banned in pubs and many other places. The doctor's wife is about mid-way on the deviousness scale between those two girls and why smoking is being reduced. As if anybody wants to save lives. What a ******* silly idea that is. So they can get pensions for longer and longer periods whilst sitting on cruise liner decks, like ci. does, telling the FEDS where they are going wrong and how stupid everybody is.

Spendius.....I hope that you have taken note that your new ale limit is 6 pints per week...for your health you know, and the rest of us get a say in what you put in that old gut of yours, and the right to harass you if you refuse to follow direction.

http://able2know.org/topic/173679-1

I didn't take any notice when they said it was 21 pints a week. Hangovers are the only thing I take any notice of. My body tells me how much to put down. And I'm not on any medications. Or any other ones besides drinking and smoking I should say. There are no "silk in a glass" pills.

It's amazing what they will say to get you to rely on their medications. And discourage you from spending your wages on anything that doesn't redound to the glorification of females. And I can understand that.

Thank goodness for slags and sluts.

Who do you think is thumbing us down hawk? I bet it's a male. On the official definition I mean.

I think the shock waves in Europe are because the idea that a well educated, powerful and rich man should be moved to tackle a rustic from the boondoks of Guinea when a mere five hours away from the City of White Thighs has mortified our intellectual ladies.

One hamster and Firefly is my guess, almost everything I write on any thread gets two knee jerk thumbs down, presumable to alert all who are not aware that my views are not PC approved.

I don't know a lot about PC but two ladies I have met, and argued with, were of the opinion that consensual sex is profoundly disreputable and on a par with whoring on the basis that the consent is granted with some personal objective in view rather that the result of a bodily urge.

I don't think ff would lower herself to such underhanded tactics as thumbing down.

Off hand I do not think there is not one adult male who had not in his life found out that women have the ability, when they wish to used it, to lied far more convictingly then most men can tell the truth.

http://www.cnn.com/2011/CRIME/06/24/new.york.banker.guilty/index.html?hpt=hp_t2

Well, if the legal eagles think that a little light pawing is worth a stab at a $5 million civil suit then I think we know that Ophelia is looking forwards to many tens of millions in her two civil suits. Even after she pays off her lawyers she would be set for life if she gets what she wants.

All rich high profile males anywhere in the Western world need to be put on notice that they are now open to state supported blackmail anytime they are alone with a female.

This is a shift I think.....they have long known that having sex with a woman is playing Russian Roulette, but now being alone with a woman is as well.