The Communist Origin of the Modern Conservative Movement VI

Forty years ago, the union had a healthy treasury but when the WV council was established they had the union dues sent directly to them and returned a few hundred to the local barely enough to pay rent on the union hall. Most of the local union dues go to the international and the state council. Buying politicians from local dues is out of the question. A hundred here or there would be a big political contribution.

At the time the Federal government routinely returned part of the Federal taxes that had been collected which made sense.

The writers of the second amendment in 1791 could not see into the future. They couldn’t even imagine something like an AR-15 let alone grant a right to one.

We have a Federal Drug Enforcement Administration for one reason to enforce drug laws across the country.

It is up to each generation to take their place in politic.

If I had been paid on a percentage of what I bought in I would have been paid muck better.

All rights must have limits.

You cannot have a generic term for something you can’t imagine in your wildest dreams. But government is always better armed. Government was better armed then and it is better armed now.

Have you ever heard of an election? Elections decide who will serve in government and who will not.

You never had the right to weapons designed for mass murder. Weapons that are designed to fire 400-600 rounds a minute have no place in the streets.

You can neve make a law that grants a right to things that you can’t imagine.

When any government decides it can take control of internal body functions of it population regulating guns should be no problem.

The tipping is past and we will see what happens now that the NRA is in bed with the Russians.

You need only look at the Las Vegas mass murder and the pulse Night Club mass murder to realize how deadly assault weapons are without the three parts that make them fully automatic.

All shot guns have common characteristic or they would not be classified as shot guns.

The mass murders have already settled the argument and you can tell by the numbers of bodies they have piled up.

The mass murders have made the argument against assault weapons and you can never refute it.

All anyone needs to know about the NRA is how they launder Russian money for the Trump campaign.

Saying they are going to take all guns is just an NRA scare tactic to frighten the stupid. There will always be guns just not those that are designed to fire 400-600 rounds a minute.

No lie, there is an actual bill passed by NRA owned politicians that prohibited the CDC from gather statistic that could be used to control guns
TBC

The people that defended their homes could have just as easily used a flint lock rifle. There was no need for AR-15.

In the first story the intruder would have usually taken the AR-15 that had to be laying fully loaded for any child to take to school.

The tax business that had to have a security guard armed with AR-15 had to be doing more than taxes. The idiot security guard fired through the wall and could have killed anybody in the office. Your flint lock would do just as well no need for weapons of war on the streets.

You can defend yourself with a shotgun or pistol unless your being attacked by the Cuban army.

At least the affordable care act made health care affordable for some.

Many of our retirees who retired before they were eligible for Medicare could not afford insurance at a time of life they need it the most.

Affordable Health Care was the only insurance they could afford. With even an eighty percent health insurance costing over $20,000 a year on a $25,000 pension you have affordable health care or nothing.

But that is you a mass murder shooting into a crowd of children is going to pull the trigger as many times as he can as fast as he can.

The AR-15 was designed as an assault weapon designed to take on armies. You might ask a mass murder why they prefer AR-15 rather than Ruger Ranch Rifles but it will no doubt be the kill ratio.

When you are shooting into a crowd it is like shooting at the broad side of the barn just fire and you will hit something.

Assault weapons were designed to fire enough lead that you can see what you are hitting.

Zinovyevna (Ayn Rand) was raised during the communist revolution in Russia and educated in a communist university.

She did far more than warn people about communism she destroyed a way of life with her political philosophy.

Zinovyevna work of philosophy envisions America becoming a utopia for the ungodly greedy.

If it had been trated as the garbage it was it would fine but that is not what happened the other communists that founded the modern conservative movement recognized how useful Zinovyevna philosophy could be.

“Atlas Shrugged” became the template for the new society the communists that founded the modern conservative movement worked to impose.

Lilly Tang has not come up with a political philosophy designed to destroy America.

Looking at an AR-15 and Ruger Ranch Rifle is like looking at a Ferrari and a golf cart there is a world of difference.

When we bought my wife’s Rogue the 0-60 or top speed was not important. The AR-15 stated at 600 rounds a minute the gas tube melts. The number of rounds a Ruger Ranch rifle will fire is not important like the 00-60 sped on the Rogue. Two different guns designed for two different purposes.

Two different guns designed for two different purposes.

Just looking at the two there is a world of difference.

If they were the same you would care less if they banned the AR-15 because you would have all kinds of other semi-automatics to choose from but you want the one that will fire 600 rounds a minute.

The difference an assault weapon is designed to fire 600 rounds a minute and a semi-automatic can only fire a fraction of that.

Engineers are very good about design vehicles for a specific purpose. I have a jeep that will go straight up a mountain and in a snow storm but its 0-60 speed is not great and the the five speed was not designed for speed shifting I was use to a Porsche racing transmission there was a world of differenc. My Nissan 370 is quick from 0-60 but don’t even think about driving it in the snow it is rear wheel drive and it won’t go far in a snow storm. When the engineers designed these vehicles, they had a purpose in mind.

Guns are no different when assault weapons were designed to kill as many people as possible in as short of period of time as possible.

The Ruger Ranch rifle was not designed as a weapon of war. Pistols were not designed as weapons of war and none are designed to fire 600 rounds a minute.

There have been many mass murders at schools and other places where the police did exactly how they were trained and assembled outside until the swat team arrived have police discussed changing their procedure and going in to serve as another target for the shooter.

Response time is determined by where the patrol units are at the time of the call. Patrol cars are in zones and additional Traffic units work school zones if a mass murder takes place a police car would be there in a minute or two.

I have ridden with some of these idiots and I was use to 135 mph in the race car on week-ends but they scared me driving like idiots in town where a child could come out at any minute or a car cross in front of them.

Though your article said it changed in 1999 after Columbine it may have changed in Colorado but not across the country because many places have not faced a mass murder. It does no good to get more policemen killed when they have no chance of stopping a mass murder armed with an AR-15 until swat arrives with their AR-15s. Then the police have a fighting chance.

The people that will make the laws against assault weapons will not be the engineers that design guns but they will have access to all the experts who designed weapons of war.

The real experts are the mass murders who carefully studied which weapons would kill the most people. The bodies of the dead supply the best expert testimony.

They can change the rules and send all the police to a sure death by sending cops with pistols to engage someone with a weapon of war.

The first mass murder in a school where the teachers are armed will no doubt happen soon and the number of people shot will double.

The teachers will no doubt form a circular firing squad and you know what happens then.

The Charleston Police Department did exactly that and they were trained.

I will agree that the government was corrupted by the gun manufacturer’s money and is responsible for letting assault weapons on the streets to start with but it tells us more about unlimited political contributions by corporations than anything else.

Corporations should never be allowed to make political contributions to corrupt our government. I don’t want to take anything from government that government didn’t already have but I do want to take the power that corporations exercise over government.

The Maryland shooting was not a mass murder the shooter had specific targets in mind.

The shooter had no need to fire 20 rounds in less than a minute and had already stopped shooting and walked away by the time the policeman arrived.

Why do the mass murders choose assault weapons instead of semi-automatic hand guns?

Because assault weapons are designed to kill large number of people in a shortest period of time.

The policeman in FL was doing exactly what he was trained to do 30 years ago when he was hired which was long before Columbine.

Now it looks like that they willing to make shooting dummies out of policemen to save face in the press. You have no idea whether the FL had retrained its officers after Columbine.

I will give you the fact that civilians are not suppose to have guns in a gun free zone but that does not mean that there are no guns there.

I don’t know whether WV tracks stolen guns separately from other property but Justice Department does track the number of guns stolen. Between 2005 and 2010 over 1.4 million guns were stolen over 200,000 a year. The average loss if one gun is stolen is $400. The illusion that gun manufacturers push, that gun ownership keeps your family safe is just that an illusion. Owning guns make your family a target for thieves not to mention accidental shootings and suicides.

I worked with the fireman for thirty years and he lives a short distance up the road. The state policeman who investigated the break in told the fireman that whoever took his guns knew his routine. The fireman always believed it was a neighbor but could never prove it. There were other break-ins in that neighborhood including one of the police lieutenant’s son who had his door kicked in three times and no doubt he owned guns also. Again, gun ownership makes you a target.

As long as you can go to your corner gun store and buy an AR-15 why should a mass murder bother to steal it.

At a council meeting I told one councilman he was a faithful follower of PLR. He asked what that was and I told him the Path of Least Resistance and mass murders follow that path also.

A cutting torch will melt most metals and if I cut it up there would be no useable parts left.

The basic principal of democracy is majority rule.

Office holders are elected by majority with the exception of Trump and baby Bush who were elected by a majority of electoral votes.

Bills in congress are not passed by the minority. School bonds often require a super majority to pass. No school bonds are passed by a super minority.

I was able to copy and paste the quote but the word “quote” appeared at the bottom of the quote not the top. A dialogue box appeared and I hit save and it wiped out 2 hrs of work and after an hour of searching documents I gave up.

I don’t remember the topic it might have been about gay marriage since that was not a big topic in law classes at that time.

Most professional know that the structure of questions can influence the polls outcome but if it gives them a false result their polls will not be reliable and they would lose business.

There are push polls like the one used by baby Bush in South Carolina where voters were called and asked what they thought about John McCain’s black child.

It was designed to make the public in South Carolina aware that McCain had a black child (adopted) but the public was given the impression the child was from an affair.

If you don’t have to register a gun to buy it we are in far more trouble than many thought.

Republicans gripe all the time that movies are used to influence public opinion against them.

Ronald Reagan job during WWII was to make propaganda movies for the military to influence the public. I think the operation was called Funpoo or something similar and they cranked out movie after movie. The military would not have spent millions on the project during wartime if it was not effective. The movies were effective in influence Americans to join the military and go off to war. Did the movies make the public more violent? Beyond any and all doubt they picked up guns and went to kill the enemy. Your study better take a look at those movies and what they were designed to do and what they accomplish and then rethink their lame conclusions.

Hunting and guns go together like spaghetti and meatballs. As hunting declines and it is declining so will the number of guns.

What else is there? Protect your home?

Guns are an open invitation to worst criminals in your area. That leaves with target practice. Most people will eventually get tired of going bang, bang.

Statistics show beyond any doubt that gun ownership is declining.

At one time many Americans fed their families by hunting and a gun was a required tool to feed their family.

Now hunting is primarily recreational, a sport.

Like it or not the Western’s infused the idea into a generation that guns were a masculinity symbol and everyone needed one to show how masculine they were.

Those movies and the gun philosophy they drove are riding off into the sunset now.

The fantasy of guns and the reality of guns are far different. It is the fantasy you are in love with.

Any of the cases you provided could have just as easily been handled with a hand gun. The security fired two bullets not thirty.

The security fired two bullets not thirty.

Cowards are usually the ones holding the gun and that is why they have to have one in the first place.

That dog and pony show has been put on by the gun manufacturers for years to scare the stupid.

The sad thing is it works. The NRA would buy television time prior to elections and not commercial time but 30 minute blocks of program time. These 30-minute infomercials would claim the sky was falling and to make sure you vote for the most corrupt politician who was taking the gun manufacturers money. The problem with the dog and pony show is that in 242 years the country has existed no one has ever passed a bill to take guns but it sure makes a nice straw man to attack.

“Those who don’t learn from history are doomed to repeat.” Greed is a disease that will kill every one not only those who suffer from it but everyone that doesn’t suffer from it.

In the United States in the last century the ungodly greedy went from being “robber Barons” to being admired on “Lifestyle of the Rich and Famous.”

That was quite a transition to go from robber baron to most admired.

The trouble with letting a relatively few people accumulate most of country’s wealth is that wealth is not only wealth it is political power. We all know what happens to country when a relative few people have all the political power.

The ungodly greedy realized that when the press was calling them robber barons that they needed to control their image in the media but they needed to label anyone that opposed their taking a bigger and bigger share of the nations wealth label anyone a communist to squelch and debate on any more equitable distribution of wealth.

Years ago I was discussing good books I had read with a neighbor when I bought a book by famous economist it scared him and he claimed the ideas in the book were communist. He would not even read the book.

The man was not a communist by any means but the neighbor was brainwashed by the ungodly greedy. By the 60s any idea other than making the ungodly richer were considered as “communist.” Every other economic theory in the world today is not communist. The give everything to the ungodly greedy economic theory is bad for everyone.

I found the BBC code editor but I still can’t copy and paste the quote.

Income tax was a tax levied against "excess wealth," so I should never have paid the very first penny of income tax.

In order to get elected Trump posted an income plan on his site that said he would change the income tax tables so no one who made less than $50,000 would pay a penny in income tax. But as soon as the House took up the plan they decided to raise the 10% bracket to 12% to pay for the ungodly greedy tax cut the House version didn’t pass but there was no tax cut for the 10% bracket. Trump playing the familiar con game called bait and switch quickly took down his tax plan from his web site.

You do realize that $4,000 in 1913 dollars is now worth $100,702.51 in today's dollars because of inflation and for a couple the first $4,000 was exempt from the tax on "excess wealth." I have no idea where you came up with $600 dollars. “Revenue Act of 1913” on Wikipedia will give you the correct figure. The ungodly greedy would like to rewrite history but this information is an actual law.

If you put a tax on cars we don’t tax people without cars. If we put a tax on houses those without houses are not taxed. But if we put a tax on excess wealth all of sudden people who have no excess wealth are taxed and the ungodly greedy are absolutely outraged that the people without excess wealth are not paying “their share” of a tax on "excess wealth."

This show the political power of the ungodly greedy. Excess wealth was what was debated in congress in 1913 and the amount of money exempted leaves no doubt. No workingman made $4,000 in 1913.

The Act also provided for the reinstitution of a federal income tax[2] to compensate for the anticipated loss of revenue from the reduction of tariff duties. The most recent effort to tax incomes, the Wilson-Gorman Tariff of 1894, had been declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court because the tax on dividends, interest, and rents had been deemed to be a direct tax not apportioned by representation. That obstacle, however, was removed by ratification of the Sixteenth Amendment on February 3, 1913. The Act, which was declared to be constitutional later that year by the Supreme Court in Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad, provided:

"...subject only to such exemptions and deductions as are hereinafter allowed, the net income of a taxable person shall include gains, profits, and income derived from salaries, wages, or compensation for personal service of whatever kind and in whatever form paid, or from professions, vocations, businesses, trade, commerce, or sales, or dealings in property, whether real or personal, growing out of the ownership or use of or interest in real or personal property, also from interest, rent, dividends, securities, or the transaction of any lawful business carried on for gain or profit, or gains or profits and income derived from any source whatever...."[3]
The incomes of couples exceeding $4,000, as well as those of single persons earning $3,000 or more, were subject to a 1% tax.[4] Also, the measure provided a progressive tax structure; those with high incomes were taxed at higher rates.
In only a few years, the income tax became the federal government's chief source of income and greatly exceeded tariff revenues.
Less than 1% of the population then paid federal income tax.[citation needed]
The Act was applicable to incomes for 1913, 1914, and 1915. [5]

The government didn’t get greedy greed is a sin of the individual it was the ungodly greedy who quickly constructed loopholes that assured that much of their income could not be taxed. Trusts and other artificial constructs became common tax avoidance schemes. Costs prohibits the working people from using these trusts from exempting their income. If you don’t have at least $500.000 lawyers will tell you the expenses of the Trust will consume the principal.

When I make over a $100,752.51 I will have no problem paying income tax on the dollar I made over $100,702.51. That would be my fair share.

It is very easy to look at the actual tax brackets for every year. You simply do a search for “historical tax brackets.” The tax brackets for every year are listed there. Regan was the one that pushed the tax cuts through and raised the taxes on the poor by raising social security five different times along with tripling the national debt. It was called the Reagan tax cuts. The 1981 tax cut bill was a Republican bill sponsored by Representative Jack Kemp and Senator William Roth Jr both republicans.
TBC

Your question is simple if there is a tax levied on importing corn should the people without corn pay the tax on something they don’t have.

The ungodly greedy treat income tax as it is the only tax in America it is not there are hundreds of other taxes that are regressive.

It is not that I want to compare the taxes to 1972 but to 1913 and what the income tax was designed to tax “excess wealth.”

The changes on the tax on excess wealth were bought and paid for by the ungodly greedy by paying off conservative politician with “campaign contributions.”

What is intellectual dishonest is the ungodly greedy pretending that a tax on excess wealth was levied on the middle class and poor and pretending moral outrage because the poor aren’t paying their fair share when their fair share is zero.

If you can actually do the taxes yourself, you have no need of a tax calculator which no doubt is fraudulent.

The taxes can be done on a post card according to the Republicans.

Pew Research Center was funded by one of the richest oil barons in America. If the Pew Research Center was aske to find who should pay income tax they would say the poor. There is no more powerful motive than self-interest and each and every person who works there is paid by the Pew Trust. All of these “non-partisan” fact tanks funded by the ungodly greedy. Their facts are tainted by wealth.

You have to know a little bit about history to know that income tax was levied on excess wealth.

This year repairing a section of the interstate highway the repair cost is $50 million dollars.

The huge trucks that destroyed the highway belong to the rich who roll up and down the highway day in and day out. Studies have shown the ungodly greedy get far more in government services there are more kinds of welfare for the rich programs than even you can even imagine.

It isn’t a tax credit it is a welfare program and should not be administered by the IRS it should be administered as the other welfare programs. It has nothing to do with taxes and everything to do with welfare.

Who does your taxes?

You have no clue. You are confusion itemizing your deductions with personal exemptions.

If you had ten children, you had 12 personal exemptions last year that was $48,600 the Republican tax scam eliminated the personal deductions and gave them $11,700 increase in the standard deduction the couple will have to pay taxes on additional $36,900 this year.

It is had to argue taxes when you have no idea how it works, and this is what the Republicans counted on for their tax scam to work.

Everyone who voted for Trump may not be racist, but Trump is the most racist president since Woodrow Wilson.

No other president has the mob ties or the ties to the Russians. Wilson thought the KKK were heroes.

Trump has done more to destroy the environment than 110 presidents.

When you make learned ignorance your goal it makes America far worse for everyone.

My source for that information was Meet the Press Daily one of the oldest and most trusted new sources in America.

Most of the money in a presidential campaign does not go to the candidate but to Political Action Committees (PAC) the money given directly to candidate is limited by law, but the money given to PACs is unlimited by ruling of the Supreme court. For instance, the NRA may spend $100s of millions on television time to help get a president elected. The major amount money given to a presidential candidate is given to the PACs.
Since it has been established beyond any doubt that Russians interfered with the 2016 election the fact that Russia gave far more than is legal campaign contribution is illegal.

Hillary came from Arkansas she was a transplant to New York to run for the senate she was not a home town girly from New York. However, Trump was a hometown boy raised in New York. It is almost unheard for a presidential candidate not to carry his home town. The typical New Yorker's impression is he is a clown.

The whole intent of home schooling kids is to keep them isolated and away from outside influences.

When you want your children to believe that God intended them to have 93 wives you don’t want them to socialize with anybody outside the cult.

Brainwashing? That is the objective of homeschooling. They don’t want their children exposed to any ideas that don’t agree with cult thinking.

The forerunner of home schooling was cult education.

I can remember growing up in a neighborhood full of children but there was one large family that sent their children to Catholic school of the 100 or so kids in that block they never had anything to do with anyone they were completely isolated. They lived within a couple hundred feet of the house I grew up in. I can not remember even once when they spoke to anyone in the neighborhood. The cult wanted them isolated. Sick minds do that.

When you look at the typical profile of a mass murder they are loners.

If you knew anything about communism you would know that I am not one. Your use of the word communism just shows your ignorance.

Adam Lanza is a perfect example of home schooling while others may have become loners and isolated in a public school the fact is they became loners. Socialization failed them.