@H2O MAN,
H2O MAN wrote:
oralloy wrote:
H2O MAN wrote:Quote:Rep. Carolyn McCarthy, D-N.Y., and Sen. Frank Lautenberg, D-N.J., plan to introduce legislation to limit high-capacity clips that allow shooters to fire a large number of rounds without reloading.
"But for the average citizen, I do not believe they should be able to have large-capacity clips,” McCarthy added.
Screw her and Lautenberg.
I find it noteworthy that mainstream gun control advocates always want to make an exception for the police.
I'm curious if the police have any use for high-capacity magazines that would not also apply to a civilian defending themselves.
Why exempt the police?
Maybe it's because mainstream gun control advocates (liberals) are not self reliant and they always wait for the police to rescue them.
You never know when the police will be needed to put-down civil unrest and allowing the police to keep high capacity mags makes liberals feel more secure.
That 's exactly what it
IS.
Thay wanna rely upon the collective
for their very existence,
NOT on the Individual.
Gun control, or freedom of self-defense
is the pivotal point, the fork in the road.
Will the collective hold the Individual (who created it) in docile
subjection,
or
will the Individual
remain FREE,
being stingy in his grudging gift of jurisdiction to the collective,
and its henchman, government ?
David
