24
   

BREAKING NEWS! Senate Votes to Repeal Don't Ask, Don't Tell Bill 63 - 33!

 
 
failures art
 
  2  
Reply Sat 18 Dec, 2010 03:41 pm
@georgeob1,
Bullshit.

But by all means, refuse to accept the reality. You only exhaust yourself.

If detrimental tension about sexuality exists in the front lines, then you're right it will continue. At least now it will not be solely the burden of the gay solders.

Ain't no molehill high enough
R
T
georgeob1
 
  0  
Reply Sat 18 Dec, 2010 03:49 pm
@failures art,
On what real experience and knowledge do you base that opinion ?
failures art
 
  1  
Reply Sat 18 Dec, 2010 03:54 pm
@georgeob1,
Having worked with homosexuals and seeing no decrease in group function. Duh. For that matter, that includes work in a mission environment for long periods of time.

Anticipating cliche response
R
T
0 Replies
 
Thomas
 
  3  
Reply Sat 18 Dec, 2010 04:01 pm
@georgeob1,
georgeob1 wrote:
With this vote it will be difficult for the services to prevent or limit the creation of associations of homosexual servicemembers in the service academies and in fighting units.

Well, good!

georgeob1 wrote:
It was hard enough running a Battalion, Regiment or large ship like an aircraft carrier in operational situations: it will be much harder now.

On what experience with commanding openly gay soldiers are you basing this opinion?
Finn dAbuzz
 
  2  
Reply Sat 18 Dec, 2010 04:07 pm
@failures art,
failures art wrote:

Bullshit.

But by all means, refuse to accept the reality. You only exhaust yourself.

If detrimental tension about sexuality exists in the front lines, then you're right it will continue. At least now it will not be solely the burden of the gay solders.

Ain't no molehill high enough
R
T


So a purpose of this bill is to make life as miserable for straight soldiers on the front lines as it has been for gay ones?

If sexual tension is detrimental to our ability to wage war on the front lines, why wouldn't a better solution be to eliminate the source of tension rather than make sure it's effects are spread evenly?

It's entirely possible and quite probable that with time, the tensions in the more open environment to which this repeal will lead will work themselves out, but what McCain was arguing is that the consequence of this tension on the battlefield is too great to rely on time and communication to sort out.



sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Sat 18 Dec, 2010 04:11 pm
Oops, I looked but I missed this one.

A woo and a meep meep.
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  2  
Reply Sat 18 Dec, 2010 04:19 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Quote:
It's entirely possible and quite probable that with time, the tensions in the more open environment to which this repeal will lead will work themselves out, but what McCain was arguing is that the consequence of this tension on the battlefield is too great to rely on time and communication to sort out.


Yes we going to need to keep those damn blacks out of combat units.

Oh sorry my time travel get me confused at times.
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Sat 18 Dec, 2010 04:27 pm
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:

Quote:
It's entirely possible and quite probable that with time, the tensions in the more open environment to which this repeal will lead will work themselves out, but what McCain was arguing is that the consequence of this tension on the battlefield is too great to rely on time and communication to sort out.


Yes we going to need to keep those damn blacks out of combat units.

Oh sorry my time travel get me confused at times.



Didn't take half as long as I thought it would.
0 Replies
 
failures art
 
  1  
Reply Sat 18 Dec, 2010 04:45 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Finn dAbuzz wrote:
So a purpose of this bill is to make life as miserable for straight soldiers on the front lines as it has been for gay ones?

Equal rights is a dish best served with chilled wine. The fight for civil rights is not won by catering to irrational beliefs. If some straight soldiers become "miserable," they can talk to a counselor. Mind you, gay soldiers weren't even afforded this under DADT because counselors had to reveal if a soldier outed themselves.

Finn dAbuzz wrote:
If sexual tension is detrimental to our ability to wage war on the front lines, why wouldn't a better solution be to eliminate the source of tension rather than make sure it's effects are spread evenly?

DADT created tension. If gay people create tension for some straight people, why would knowing who is gay create more? The gays are already there in the unit.

Finn dAbuzz wrote:
It's entirely possible and quite probable that with time, the tensions in the more open environment to which this repeal will lead will work themselves out, but what McCain was arguing is that the consequence of this tension on the battlefield is too great to rely on time and communication to sort out.

What McCain is arguing is always changing Finn. Nothing needs to be proven to McCain. More money and time has gone into doing exactly what he said should be done than there ever needed to be.

We are putting this to rest. McCain played bad cards. He should have folded a long time ago.

A
R
This speaks terribly on his judgment.
0 Replies
 
failures art
 
  1  
Reply Sat 18 Dec, 2010 04:50 pm
Coming soon: Ask and Tell (if you wish).

A
R
T
0 Replies
 
failures art
 
  1  
Reply Sat 18 Dec, 2010 05:01 pm
Quote:
John McCain's Inglorious DADT Moment
By Garance Franke-Ruta


In the end, eight Republican senators cast their votes to allow gays and lesbians to serve openly in the U.S. armed forces, repealing the 17-year-old "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy.

But Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) did not join them and used his time on the Senate floor Saturday to stand athwart history yelling stop.

"Today is a very sad day," McCain announced, detailing his continuing opposition to allowing gay and lesbian soldiers to be open about their sexuality.

"There will be high-fives over all the liberal bastions of America," he predicted, from "the elite schools that bar military recruiters from campus" to "the salons of Georgetown" and the "talk shows" where people -- "most of whom have never have served in the military" -- will crow over the law's repeal.

Allowing gays to serve openly in the Marines would prove a potentially deadly distraction McCain said, quoting from a Marine Corps Commandant warning, "and I don't want to permit that opportunity to happen."

Liberal blogs ThinkProgress and FireDogLake have highlighted some of the excerpts of his remarks.

Eight Republican Senators voted in favor of repeal of DADT: Scott Brown (Mass.); Richard Burr (NC); Susan Collins (of Maine, and a co-sponsor of the repeal effort); John Ensign (Nevada); Mark Kirk (Illinois); Lisa Murkowski (Alaska); Olympia Snowe (Maine) and George Voinovich of Ohio.

McCain's vigorous opposition to the DADT repeal is not the first time he's found himself swimming against the tide of history. As a congressman in 1983, he voted against the creation of a federal holiday honoring Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. -- a vote he later regretted.

"On the Martin Luther King issue, we all learn, OK? We all learn," he told NBC in 1999, discussing his vote. "I will admit to learning, and I hope that the people that I represent appreciate that, too. I voted in 1983 against the recognition of Martin Luther King....I regret that vote."

This time, however, McCain is in the mainstream of his party in casting the socially conservative vote; in 1983 the majority of House Republicans voted in favor of the creation of the MLK holiday.


Source

Who wants a high-five?

A
R
T
djjd62
 
  2  
Reply Sat 18 Dec, 2010 05:03 pm
i have known a few gay men, i found that most of the time the people they were attracted to were other gay men, i'm always amazed by guys who get uptight by guys checking them out, big deal, i look at women that i'm not gonna hit on or harass, sometimes you see someone attractive, it can be flattering

i've never had to say, you got the wrong person, more than once to any gay man i've ever met, including a great night that me and a girlfriend, a buddy and his girlfriend and two gay guys she worked with spent at a gay club in toronto i the late 80's, the music was amazing
Finn dAbuzz
 
  2  
Reply Sat 18 Dec, 2010 05:30 pm
@djjd62,
djjd62 wrote:

i have known a few gay men, i found that most of the time the people they were attracted to were other gay men, i'm always amazed by guys who get uptight by guys checking them out, big deal, i look at women that i'm not gonna hit on or harass, sometimes you see someone attractive, it can be flattering

i've never had to say, you got the wrong person, more than once to any gay man i've ever met, including a great night that me and a girlfriend, a buddy and his girlfriend and two gay guys she worked with spent at a gay club in toronto i the late 80's, the music was amazing


That may very well be the case, but do you dismiss out of hand the opions of soldiers and marines fighting on the front lines?

At this point there really isn't much purpose to arguments to support the repeal; as its been achieved.

I'm not arguing that the fighting men who have expressed concern over the repeal can reasonably support their concern, or that their concern should have been the deciding factor, but I don't think their concern should be blithely dismissed, and the officers and politicans who took postions based on it should be castigated
djjd62
 
  5  
Reply Sat 18 Dec, 2010 05:32 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
i can't help them with their prejudices, only they can address that issue
tsarstepan
 
  2  
Reply Sat 18 Dec, 2010 05:37 pm
@failures art,
Reciprocating Fail'arts high five!
http://i51.tinypic.com/2ur35hc.jpg

This just retweeted by actor Whil Wheaton ...
Quote:
tombrazelton Tom Brazelton
by wilw
Read about Senate vote to repeal DADT on Twitter. Turned on CNN for more information and they're talking about Tron: Legacy. #fail

The 24 hour news networks have always been clueless to what's truly important to their viewers.
0 Replies
 
maxdancona
 
  2  
Reply Sat 18 Dec, 2010 07:34 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Quote:

I'm not arguing that the fighting men who have expressed concern over the repeal can reasonably support their concern, or that their concern should have been the deciding factor, but I don't think their concern should be blithely dismissed, and the officers and politicans who took postions based on it should be castigated


I won't ask about their "concern". If they don't tell they can be as "concerned" as they want.

0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  4  
Reply Sat 18 Dec, 2010 07:41 pm
To Mc Cain:

Many of those people who lost limbs or lives were quietly homosexual, or bi.

Shut the **** up.
JPB
 
  1  
Reply Sat 18 Dec, 2010 07:43 pm
@djjd62,
applause
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Sat 18 Dec, 2010 07:57 pm
@ossobuco,
I love that McCain in his old age had turn himself into a far right wing nut from a middle of roader.

Anything to keep a hold of power it would seem.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 18 Dec, 2010 08:24 pm
@tsarstepan,
Yay!!!!!!!!!!!
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.99 seconds on 12/24/2024 at 11:02:44