@Finn dAbuzz,
Finn dAbuzz wrote:So a purpose of this bill is to make life as miserable for straight soldiers on the front lines as it has been for gay ones?
Equal rights is a dish best served with chilled wine. The fight for civil rights is not won by catering to irrational beliefs. If some straight soldiers become "miserable," they can talk to a counselor. Mind you, gay soldiers weren't even afforded this under DADT because counselors had to reveal if a soldier outed themselves.
Finn dAbuzz wrote:If sexual tension is detrimental to our ability to wage war on the front lines, why wouldn't a better solution be to eliminate the source of tension rather than make sure it's effects are spread evenly?
DADT created tension. If gay people create tension for some straight people, why would knowing who is gay create more? The gays are already there in the unit.
Finn dAbuzz wrote:It's entirely possible and quite probable that with time, the tensions in the more open environment to which this repeal will lead will work themselves out, but what McCain was arguing is that the consequence of this tension on the battlefield is too great to rely on time and communication to sort out.
What McCain is arguing is always changing Finn. Nothing needs to be proven to McCain. More money and time has gone into doing exactly what he said should be done than there ever needed to be.
We are putting this to rest. McCain played bad cards. He should have folded a long time ago.
A
R
This speaks terribly on his judgment.