snood
 
  2  
Wed 9 Dec, 2015 08:04 am
How do the rest of you feel about my surmise that Trump is intentionally trying to get included out?
Lash
 
  2  
Wed 9 Dec, 2015 08:25 am
@snood,
I think, based on related articles, that he sincerely has a Hitler fixation, and he sees himself as the anti-PC savior of America.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  2  
Wed 9 Dec, 2015 08:46 am
@snood,
snood wrote:

How do the rest of you feel about my surmise that Trump is intentionally trying to get included out?


I have said several time...in this thread, I think...that Donald Trump DOES NOT WANT to be president of the United States.

I think he would LOVE to be denied the nomination (in his estimation, unfairly) and then see the Dems win the election. He would gloat!

It is my opinion that he will not run as a third party candidate using his own money.
Lash
 
  1  
Wed 9 Dec, 2015 08:49 am
@Frank Apisa,
What was his motivation- helping Hillary? I don't think you can write off a presidential run, though I could be wrong.

A pay off from the Clintons?
Frank Apisa
 
  2  
Wed 9 Dec, 2015 08:56 am
@Lash,
Lash wrote:

What was his motivation- helping Hillary?


I would think his "motivation" is apparent. He is an ego-maniac...and just loves the attention he is getting.

What he is doing is an ego-satisfying, fun diversion.


Quote:
I don't think you can write off a presidential run, though I could be wrong.


He may run...but although I think the Republican Party is a abomination right now...even I do not think it is stupid enough to select Donald Trump as its nominee.

We'll see.


Quote:

A pay off from the Clintons?


I pity you, Lash. I just...PITY...you.
Lash
 
  2  
Wed 9 Dec, 2015 09:00 am
@Frank Apisa,
Just trying to understand your reasoning. He's spent a lot. If he's primarily motivated by greed and power, was wondering what prize he anticipated if not the presidency.
Walter Hinteler
 
  2  
Wed 9 Dec, 2015 09:00 am
Quote:
http://i64.tinypic.com/20gksn.jpg
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  2  
Wed 9 Dec, 2015 09:10 am
@Lash,
Lash wrote:

Just trying to understand your reasoning. He's spent a lot. If he's primarily motivated by greed and power, was wondering what prize he anticipated if not the presidency.


Read what I wrote in my first response to you, Lash. I did not say he was motivated by greed and power.
Walter Hinteler
 
  3  
Wed 9 Dec, 2015 09:43 am
@izzythepush,
I think, the UK really is radicalised: even the Queen wears a hijab instead of a crown ...
http://i63.tinypic.com/2q324up.jpg

... and 'ham' had to be dropped from Birmingham
http://i68.tinypic.com/a23xaa.jpg
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  2  
Wed 9 Dec, 2015 10:16 am
@Frank Apisa,
No, I'm saying that...
parados
 
  4  
Wed 9 Dec, 2015 10:17 am
@Brandon9000,
Trump proposed preventing US citizens re-entering the country if they are Muslim.

Can you think of three ways this violates the US Constitution?
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Wed 9 Dec, 2015 10:24 am
@snood,
No doubt in my mind. He wants to be a king maker, not a king.
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Wed 9 Dec, 2015 10:26 am
http://editorialcartoonists.com/cartoons/VarveG/2015/VarveG20151209_low.jpg
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Wed 9 Dec, 2015 10:32 am
http://upload.democraticunderground.com/imgs/2015/151209-two-responses-to-the-san-bernadino-massacre.jpg
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  2  
Wed 9 Dec, 2015 10:49 am
@Lash,
Clinton being for increased prison time isn't evidence of him using divisive politics. It was a mistake he now recognizes but he didn't do it to pit one electoral group against another.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -1  
Wed 9 Dec, 2015 10:56 am
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:
They cost a fortune to not only build but to fly.

Compared to the cost of NOT having bombers, they are dirt cheap.


BillRM wrote:
By the way given that we are talking two billions or so for each B2 plane there should not be anyway for the crew to bail out......Bring the damn thing home

Actually the B-2 bombers were about half-a-billion per plane.

And the new bombers that we're getting will also be about half-a-billion per plane. Considering inflation, that will make them cheaper than a B-2.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -1  
Wed 9 Dec, 2015 11:01 am
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:
Then we have the 'cheap' 300 millions B1

Once we start getting our new stealth bombers, we might give Israel all our B-1s and B-52s.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -2  
Wed 9 Dec, 2015 11:04 am
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:
Who said it is Hawkeye fault just that the two new bombers have problems to say the least compare to the many generations B52 workhorse.

Actually he said three. Unless he made a typo (which is possible) he was also complaining about the new stealth bombers too.

Although I see nothing to complain about. I'm delighted with the new bombers.
BillRM
 
  1  
Wed 9 Dec, 2015 12:13 pm
@oralloy,
You love spending billions a copy?

I still can remember when the first 2 billions dollars B2 crash on takeoff with the happy news that while the plane was now just been turn into scrap metal the crew got out ok.

As I said at that price there should not be an ejection system.

ehBeth
 
  3  
Wed 9 Dec, 2015 12:50 pm
@izzythepush,
just read the petition is now past 250,000 signatures

hunh
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 2.52 seconds on 12/24/2024 at 11:28:39