TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?!

@MontereyJack,

in today's news:

Quote:

Federal officials say they have new evidence that Mexico's most violent drug cartels are exploiting U.S. guns laws to acquire massive quantities of assault rifles and other firearms for use in their war against the Mexican government.

MontereyJack wrote:

David, when you get caught in the crossfire between two New York City outposts of different drug cartels (cause you know that's where they're going to be peddling a lot of their product) and you pull out your .45, causing them to turn their assault rifles on you, as you and fifty other more innocent victims lie dieing in the street, remember it was you and the NRA who turned the country from peaceable into a war zone.

Jack, your fantasies r full of nonsense.

I guess u probably think
that criminals OBAY the law,
so thay r really interested in what the gun laws
require of them, the same way that thay care
about NOT smoking marijuana, because that is against the law, right ????????

Vermont has NEVER had any anti-gun laws
and it did not have any trouble.

Anyway,
the way to succeed in the Drug War
is to surrender and go back to basic AMERICANISM
in which each citizen will decide for himself
what he will ingest (including poisons), with no government interference.

The anti-drug laws r unConstitutional USURPATIONS of power. Thay shoud be repealed.
The drug price woud drop thru the floor,
cheaper than apples.

I 'd restore the status quo ante, as of 1900.

David

2 Replies

@OmSigDAVID,

Quote:

I 'd restore the status quo ante, as of 1900.

Back then we used to make little kids of 10 and 11 work as "coal splitters" at collieries. We also had robber barons who crushed the working class with their hired goons. We had poll taxes and women still couldnt vote in most of the US

1 Reply

@farmerman,

David loves to look backwards, and forget the future.

1 Reply

@cicerone imposter,

Hes a libertarian those guys often have some of their creed based on common sense, but every so often, they just disappear into space as they go back to their mother ship.

0 Replies

@OmSigDAVID,

Quote:

Plain, you are a fool.
There is no point in convincing u that it is dark at nite,
nor that it is cold in winter.

In that I have lost ALL respect for your mind,
for your ability to reason (or to remember).
I have no interest in convincing u of anything.
I might as well talk to a barking dog, as to u.

I don't care WHAT u think about anything.

See, I used facts and quotes and reason and you, who make specious claims of having been a trial attorney, become so angry that you totally lose all control.

Funny, attorneys are always so controlled.

Lost respect for my mind? The last thing that I want is respect from you. You respect guns and people who carry them. Why would I want to be respected? In fact, your derision is a compliment.

If you don't care, why are you sounding off?

1 Reply

@OmSigDAVID,

Quote:

We had time on our hands.

Was that NM or AZ? AZ has one of the poorest education systems in the country. No wonder you had time on your hands.

0 Replies

@OmSigDAVID,

Quote:

Jack, your fantasies r full of nonsense.

I guess u probably think
that criminals OBAY the law,
so thay r really interested in what the gun laws
require of them, the same way that thay care
about NOT smoking marijuana, because that is against the law, right ????????

You're in an institution, right?

1 Reply

@plainoldme,

Daid wrote:

Plain, you are a fool.
There is no point in convincing u that it is dark at nite,
nor that it is cold in winter.

In that I have lost ALL respect for your mind,
for your ability to reason (or to remember).
I have no interest in convincing u of anything.
I might as well talk to a barking dog, as to u.

I don't care WHAT u think about anything.

plainoldme wrote:

See, I used facts and quotes and reason and you,
who make specious claims of having been a trial attorney,
become so angry that you totally lose all control.

Funny, attorneys are always so controlled.

An attorney woud have to be foolish
(and very sorry) if he were so injudicious as
to accept U as a client; no joke.

0 Replies

@plainoldme,

plainoldme wrote:

Quote:
Jack, your fantasies r full of nonsense.

I guess u probably think
that criminals OBAY the law,
so thay r really interested in what the gun laws
require of them, the same way that thay care
about NOT smoking marijuana, because that is against the law, right ????????

You're in an institution, right?

I lament your mental vacuity; its sad.
I wish that u were sufficiently intelligent
to be WORTH debating, but there are
other leftists in this forum whose intelligences are worth debating.
I 'll satisfy myself with them.

0 Replies

I mean what was the point in having Michele Bachmann doing a rebuttal in addition to Paul Ryan? I think someone should have told her what camera to look into.

1 Reply

@revelette,

Michele Bachmann didn't understand a word Obama spoke. Her rebuttal wasn't even consistent with the SOU speech.

2 Replies

I decided to watch the entire bachmann presentation. With the exception of the flag raising at Iwo Jima -- what did that have to do with anything? -- I felt I was watching Romper Room.

0 Replies

@cicerone imposter,

But she did get to use the word "socialism" and scare people like okie and ican. So it was a good speech for them.

0 Replies

@cicerone imposter,

I don't think it was presented as a rebuttal at all. Instead it was a starkly contrasting interpretation of the present situation. Moreover, it was more realistic than the fantasies presented by a president who is clearly maneuvering for political purposes, but otherwise has no plan to offer us but more payoffs with borrowed public money to his paying constiturents. Indeed his new "remedy, "investments" looks strangely like the government activist capitalism that has brought Europe to the brink of disaster.

1 Reply

@georgeob1,

Quote:

I don't think it was presented as a rebuttal at all. Instead it was a starkly contrasting interpretation of the present situation.

I guess bat loon crazy could be called "a contrasting interpretation."

0 Replies

If the tea party has split to such an extent where they need their own spokesperson separate and apart from the republican party to rebut the presidential address, perhaps they should form their own third party.

1 Reply

@revelette,

That's already being done by fiat; Palin, the VP GOP candidate is one of the leaders of the Tea Party, but most conservatives separate her from the old-guard Republicans.

0 Replies

The T.E.A. PARTY, it's got to be better than PrezBO's FIST PARTY.

Fistriders = progressive liberal Obama democrats

2 Replies

@H2O MAN,

but progressing toward WHAT ???? (marxism)

0 Replies

@H2O MAN,

One measure of insanity is the constant use of neologisms and nonsense phrases. Sorta like H2O "man".

1 Reply

TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?!

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know