TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?!

@plainoldme,

plainoldme wrote:

David, your problem is paranoia, plain and simple.

There is an error in your diagosis, Dr. Plain.
I do not correspond to any of those criteria, to wit:
I know that no one is following me.
I know that no one is watching me.
I know that no one has ever tapped my fone.
I know that I have no enemies, nor conspiracies,
nor do I possess extraordinary powers that interest anyone.

I 've known some paranoid chicks over the years
n became aware of the elements of that diagnosis because of them.

Fear not, Dr. Plain: I 'll not proceed against u for malpractice.

What I posted was a recognition of a potential possibility, NOT an accomplished fact.

Is there any known correspondence between alienation of affection
and paranoia ?
Has there ever been such a study, Dr. Plain ?

David

1 Reply

@IRFRANK,

IRFRANK wrote:

You might laugh, but the Bush tax cuts are exactly what made our current deficits.
You want to reign in spending? Start with Defense, 50% of the budget.

Yeah, that 's a GREAT idea!
We shoud not be able to DEFEND ourselves.

(Maybe the English and Scotch will come back to GET us.)

IRFRANK wrote:

I laugh when I hear people say we can balance the budget if we just stop giving money away to poor people.

Government was never granted jurisdiction to do that.

IRFRANK wrote:

Despite the GOP rhetoric, no one spends like the GOP, just look at the Reagan years and Bush I and II.

Reagan was forced into it, because he HAD to come up with a budget and the Democrats possessed the House.

He had to compromise with them, to avoid paralysis.
He 'd not have gotten any money at all.

WITH the compromise, as unsavory as it was,
he ran the communist economy into the ground,
such that we WON the Third World War
when our commie enemies collapsed.

Defeating the commies was better than defeating the nazis.

David

1 Reply

@OmSigDAVID,

You are comfortable only when armed.

You are so worried about these two kids who were encouraged (allegedly) to accuse their father of sexual abuse by their mother that you have posted it at least twice, along with a tag line about glad you are that you never had kids.

Both of those are symptoms of paranoia.

Your own claims -- which are far too narrow and decidedly unscientific -- about what paranoia consists of do not reflect the reality of paranoia.

Unlike you,david, I live in the real world.

2 Replies

@plainoldme,

plainoldme wrote:

You are comfortable only when armed.

Armed with common sense, something you and the vast majority of liberals lack.

2 Replies

@H2O MAN,

armed with bullshit, more like it.

1 Reply

@H2O MAN,

I enjoyed that, I'm still laughing.

0 Replies

@eurocelticyankee,

He's heavily armed with bullshit. He's packing bullshit.

1 Reply

@eurocelticyankee,

eurocelticyankee wrote:

He's heavily armed with bullshit. He's packing bullshit.

Hey, that's our PrezBO you're talking about.

0 Replies

@plainoldme,

plainoldme wrote:

You are comfortable only when armed.

EVERYONE shoud be.
Its only a question of their personal safety.

plainoldme wrote:

You are so worried [ ?? ] about these two kids who were encouraged (allegedly)
to accuse their father of sexual abuse by their mother that you have posted it at least twice,

YES; I think its interesting. No one agrees with me.

The victim was not my friend. I never met him; the concept of worry does not apply to me,
because I 'm under no possible threat. YOU ARE, but I don 't care.

plainoldme wrote:

along with a tag line about glad you are that you never had kids.

I revel n rejoice in that. I really LIKE It.

plainoldme wrote:

Both of those are symptoms of paranoia.

That is absolutely NOT true; u simply don 't understand what u r talking about;
very confused definition, in your mind.

plainoldme wrote:

Your own claims -- which are far too narrow and decidedly unscientific -- about what paranoia consists of
do not reflect the reality of paranoia.

I just used the standard, ordinary definition.

I think u did not read what I posted,
or u 'd not have said that.

plainoldme wrote:

Unlike you,david, I live in the real world.

Sadly: u don 't.
U proved that last nite; much worse than I thought,
but I don 't dislike u for it.

U r 100% out-of-touch with reality, but u r harmless.

0 Replies

July 13th, 2010
http://politicalmuse.com/

Michelle Obama demanded that Tea Party members must acknowledge the “historic and present racist elements that are within the Tea Party movement.” I wonder if Michelle demanded that the Democratic party acknowledge their own historic and present racists elements within the Democratic party – namely Robert Bryd.

Ironically, one of the leading tea party activists here in Dallas is Rev. C.L. Bryant, a former president of NAACP’s Garland chapter. He is quoted as saying that suggesting the Tea Party is racist is “simply a lie”. He points out that since we have a black president we seem to be ‘hyper-sensitive to rally posters’ – with Reagan, Clinton or Bush everyone just ignored the nut with the Nazi/Facist/Racist poster.

For example, one of the most famous campaign posters from the Democratic party is from the 1866 Pennsylvania gubernatorial race. Hiester Clymer (D) versus James White Geary (R) suggests that a vote for Clymer is for the white man while a vote for Geary is for the ‘negro’. This is pretty horrific ‘history’, but I don’t think we should paint Michelle and her party with this negative brush – we should let their actions speak for themselves. Perhaps they should do the same for Republicans and Tea Party folks – lets not paint them with the ‘racist’ brush.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/49/Racistcampaignposter.jpg/747px-Racistcampaignposter.jpg

0 Replies

@OmSigDAVID,

Oh, is that what you call it; compromise. Whatever happened during the past four years from the No Party? They forgot about compromise, and remembered only one vote, "no."

2 Replies

@cicerone imposter,

These guys just re-enforce stereo typical Republicanism. Uncompromising, self-righteous, gun-toting, bitter, hate filled, know all jackass's. Trust me Cicerone your wasting your time. It's set in stone with these guys.

1 Reply

@eurocelticyankee,

Obama democrats:
Say one thing - do another, uncompromising, self-righteous, totally dependent, government loving,
self-hating, ignorant, racist, bigoted, left wing, lying, cheating, liberal progressive loons.

2 Replies

@H2O MAN,

Yihaah, h20. why don't you round up everybody who disagrees with you, get a bit of cleansing going, you'd like that wouldn't you. yihaah!

1 Reply

@cicerone imposter,

cicerone imposter wrote:

Oh, is that what you call it; compromise. Whatever happened during the past four years from the No Party?
They forgot about compromise, and remembered only one vote, "no."

The compromise was that the Democrats in the House woud fund DEFENSE spending,
to lift us out of the deficient conditions left by Jimmy Carter,
if Reagan agreed to socialistic welfare state spending. It was very expensive.

He had no choice.

David

1 Reply

@eurocelticyankee,

eurocelticyankee wrote:

Yihaah,
h20. why don't you round up everybody who agrees with you, get a bit of cleansing going, you'd like that wouldn't you.
yihaah!

Me and a bunch of agreeable sweet young ladies in a shower sounds great
as long as the water has been properly conditioned and you are far, far away.

1 Reply

@OmSigDAVID,

Defense spending? Isn't that the republican word of god?

BTW, I also believe in a strong defensive military, but not to be the police of this world. We waste billions protecting other nations when our own country is falling apart.

1 Reply

@eurocelticyankee,

eurocelticyankee wrote:

No problem dave, I'll leave you be, Just do not accuse be of being happy about 9-11. .

Yeah, u lied to me before about that;
its an open question as to how many MORE times u will lie about it again in the future.

David

1 Reply

@H2O MAN,

Ha, now that does sound sweet. I'm only messing with h20, I'm sure your a decent guy, we'll just have to agree to disagree on some fundamentals. I'd settle for one sweet lady, which I have. We cant be greedy, only republicans do that. Haaaaaaa

0 Replies

@OmSigDAVID,

Who are you???

0 Replies

TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?!

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know