@plainoldme,
plainoldme wrote:
Quote:Fido wrote:
To say a woman owns her body is not a moral argument; but a legal argument...
David replied:
That is false; it is both.
Apparently, David was not around during the 1960s to hear anti-war protestors say:
You can't legislate morality.
Abalard said Ius-Justice is the Genus, and Lex- Law, a species of it... In its proper relation, a law must be just to be law, which is to say moral... But, as one English jurist said: There are no imaginary cases... We cannot base a real infringement of rights of a real living person on the contingency basis of some person who is for all practical purposes, even if conceived, still theoretical, that is to say: Imaginary...
If we give the unborn rights, then why not give the dead rights, or give all future generations unconceived- rights... Traditionally; one must live and claim rights to have rights, and it is one of those problems with rights for animals, that though they live, they cannot plead their own case... So the morality of the situation, though real, finds the potential mother already the victim, for it is her next of kin who is killed, and it is her traditional task to defend and avenge her babes, and if she does not when it is her right and obligation, then she does so for society, for the benefit of society, because her demand for rights for her children would be an imposition on this Christian community....
She should not have to ask the Christians for help that should be freely given... It is the Christians who invented Western Law, and it is they who have went about destroying all communities save their own, who have defined the individual into rights and communities out of rights even though this has resulted in the victimization of most of humanity... They have made this mess, so now that they have individual rights, and no community watches and defends their own, will they rob women of their individuality and rights???