@joefromchicago,
Quote:You're mixing things up here. If rehabilitation were the only purpose of punishment, then I'd agree: incarceration isn't the best option. Indeed, it wouldn't even be a logical or morally justifiable option, since prisons do a terrible job of rehabilitating prisoners.
I'm not mixing anything up. In the quote of mine that you quoted here I said:
Quote:
It's not me who initiated this theory that incarceration is not the best option for rehabilitation. But when I was challenged on it, I had to admit that in some ways I've come to see that it's not even the best option for punishment. I guess I do still believe it is the best way to keep the public safe from the criminal element and the results of criminal intent
I don't know about you, but the way I read that it says that incarceration is not the best option for rehabilitation - which is exactly what you said. And I also said that I'm beginning to see that it may not even be the best option to achieve any sort of punishment or deterence - as many men I see in prison admit to having a harder time living on the outside.
Quote:In this particular scenario, George Michael isn't a patient who is supposed to be treated by the state, he's an offender whose role is now to serve as a bad example for others to avoid. If he gets rehabilitated in the process, so much the better, but that's not the sole purpose of punishment.
Honestly, I'm not all that interested in George Michael and Lindsay Lohan and the rest of them. Mr. Michael was the catalyst for the initial conversation. I'd have never even brought him up to tell you the truth.
What I am interested in is trying to come up with solutions - societal solutions- that will enable prisons to do and achieve what they are meant to do and achieve.
I don't hold the bleak view that NO rehabilitation ever takes place. Because I see every day instances in which it does. I see people get off drugs. I see people learn how to become better parents. I see people learn to read and write. I see people become carpenters and plumbers and artists. So to say that no rehabilitation ever happens is wrong.
But not enough of it does. But again, I don't think it's not because the opportunity is not offered. I think - I mean I KNOW- because I'm told by these guys that they don't believe in rehabilitation as much as they should because no one on the outside believes they can be rehabilitated. And I guess they're right to an extent.
These guys have learned that when they get out - they might have all the skills they need to get a job - but who's going to hire a plumber to go into peoples' homes when they have a record for assault or robbery?
And how do you live without a job? That's why the recidivism rate is so high.
The problem I see with incarceration is that it becomes comfortable - it becomes a known quantity for some of these men, which is easier than the constant struggle for that one unknown lucky break they need to be able to turn everything around and make it on the outside that so few of them ever get.
I guess I'm most concerned about rehabilitation because that's what I'm trying to do there. I'm not a guard - so I'm less concerned about incarceration and incapacitation. I'm more concerned about seeing some sort of change that can be positive.
I do see it inside - but it often seems to all fall apart when they get back out again.
Maybe I should get a job working resettlement or something.