@failures art,
failures art wrote:oralloy wrote:failures art wrote:I never said you were denying people rights. I was referring to Mr. Jones, who is.
He is doing no such thing. All he did was attempt to exercise his FREE SPEECH rights.
Sure, and the message of his speech was to threaten American Muslims. The whole of his message is "war." He is using his rights to send the message that others should not be able to enjoy their rights.
Of course, you don't seem very well read on this issue, so I'm not going to assume you already knew that.
I'm sure there is some vile piece of propaganda you've read that demeans anyone who dares to criticize Muslims, and I probably haven't read it. But I'm likely better for not having read it.
He is not threatening anyone. Nor is he suggesting that others should not enjoy their rights. All he wanted to do was burn some Korans.
failures art wrote:oralloy wrote:failures art wrote:Your moral equivocation between a directly and aggressive provocation to all Muslims (burning Korans) with the completely unoffensive building of a community center is stupid.
No it isn't.
And your characterization of the location of the site as unoffensive is disingenuous. You may not be offended by it, but you know very well that it is extremely hurtful to a lot of people.
Park51 isn't inherently offensive. It isn't even remarkable. It's not as if the building is being built to insult other either. If you believe that narrative, you're the disingenuous one. The NYC Muslims have done nothing wrong here.
No matter how much you deny the fact that it offends people, the fact remains that it offends people.
failures art wrote:oralloy wrote:failures art wrote:Stupid comments RE: American stuff at Hiroshima ground zero and Japanese stuff at Pearl Harbor have only served to embarrass you by revealing the shallow depth of understanding you have on this.
Lying about me won't change the fact that the proposed location of this mosque is hurtful to many people.
1) It's not proposed, it is approved.
2) It's not a mosque, it's a community center with a planned mosque in it that now will additionally offer interfaith services.
Community center? More like Islamic cultural center.
There is little chance that any interfaith attempts will meet with any success if it is built there.
failures art wrote:How is the location hurtful?
Muslims have a long history of conquering places and building mosques in places that other cultures value. Look at the way they are trying to steal Jerusalem from the Jews, as one example.
Also, the WTC was attacked in the name of Islam, and the imam who would head this mosque has said some quite extremist things regarding the 9/11 attacks, claiming that US policies were partially responsible for the attack.
failures art wrote:These aren't the people responsible for 9/11. How were they supposed to make more space for their growing congregation? They partnered with the Park51 project to use one floor out of 13 so they would have more space. Why would they move away from their community? How could they even serve their constituents if they moved away from them?
Note that it is not just the mosque that is an abomination. It is the entire Park 51 project.
As for how they could make space, move to a different spot that is farther away from the WTC site.
They would not have to move so far that their constituents could not reach them.
failures art wrote:oralloy wrote:It is just a childish reaction you have when you run out of arguments.
Your concession on this matter is noted.
A
R
T
It is dishonest to claim a concession when none has been given.