Hey, Can A Woman "Ask To Get Raped"?

we are in a rape thread ...

You are a brave man indeed Hawkeye to state that opinion

It nice to know that I seem to had rape my poor wife a few hundreds time both before we was married and afterward.

really approve of someone "taking advantage of her" like that?

Quote:

You are a brave man indeed Hawkeye to state that opinion

a lesbian feminist giving a lecture on date rape is roughly on par with a Catholic priest giving a lecture on marriage....ya, they might have interesting things to say, be we know going in that they don't really KNOW of that which they speak.

I had a problem with this even when I was a feminist in collage, the militant gay ones were constantly telling straight women what they were doing wrong with their men.

IDK, she strikes me as gay...most of the militant ones that I have known have been, they never need to take the male view of intimate relationship into consideration, and don't. Maybe she is not, it is not a sure thing.

Women who get drunk are more likely to be raped than women who do not get drunk.
No, this does not excuse rape. Men who take advantage of women by raping them, drunk or sober, should be severely punished for this wicked, treacherous action, however stupid the victim may have been.
But it does mean that a rape victim who was drunk deserves less sympathy.
Simple, isn’t it? You can hate rape and want it punished, while still recognising that a woman who, say, goes back to a man’s home after several Bacardi Breezers was being a bit dim.
Yet a wave of hysterical ultra-feminist propaganda has this week forced a State agency to reverse a perfectly sensible decision to cut compensation to rape victims who were drunk.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1045954/PETER-HITCHENS-How-Left-censored-blindingly-obvious-truth-rape.html#ixzz0v82G1n9o

Getting drunk is not something that happens to you. It is something you do.
Nor is being drunk – which makes you miss danger signals, make bad judgments, lose consciousness in unsafe places and then lose your memory, too – comparable with ‘dressing provocatively’ as the feminist thought police would like to pretend.
If women want to dress provocatively, then they should be free to do so, and I say thanks a lot to those who do.
Our society is based on self-restraint. We can be provoked and still behave ourselves. We do not need to compel women to dress like bats, as many Muslim countries do, so as to curb the unchained passions of hot-blooded menfolk.
All the above is a statement of the blindingly obvious. Yet, in the main forums of public opinion, such views are becoming harder and harder to express because of the unreasoning storm of fury that will follow.

I hate to tell you this, the rape laws were not written by feminists or even by women. The overwhelming preponderance of lawmakers are men. They see rape as a very real crime.

I had no idea that you were once a feminist, Hawkeye

while rape itself increases

Is it just me or did hawkeye just quote the very thing we have all been saying all along about self-restraint?

They see rape laws as a way to get the support of one special interest group and sound like they doing something of benefit instead of being harmful to the general population.

Is it just me or did hawkeye just quote the very thing we have all been saying all along about self-restraint?

Quote:

Is it just me or did hawkeye just quote the very thing we have all been saying all along about self-restraint?

I was on board everyone being responsible for their own actions 20 pages back. Where I disagree with you is that I think that this should include women as well. I have no quibble with what Peter said.