25
   

Hey, Can A Woman "Ask To Get Raped"?

 
 
BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Oct, 2011 02:35 am
@hawkeye10,
Interesting that a male had to be a mind reader because any sexual move or contact that is un-desire is sexual assault!!!!!!

What a sad world where you need to get a verbal permission to kiss a woman for the first time to be safe from assault charges.

Somehow I do not think that women or men are going to be happy with the brave new world that Firefly wish us to live in.
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Oct, 2011 02:40 am
@BillRM,
Quote:
Somehow I do not think that women or men are going to be happy with the brave new world that Firefly wish us to live in.
It is already here Bill, it is just that most people have yet to experience it first hand and dont want to believe that our government could be as oppressive as we describe it to be. Me being in the BDSM community I got to see this before most people, not personally but by watching and listening to those around me tell their stories, but if the government comes for those like me because it does not like the sex I practice it will eventually come for many more...until we throw off this oppression.
0 Replies
 
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Oct, 2011 02:41 am
@hawkeye10,
Quote:
That is what we call it because those who write the law want to frame the issue to their liking, the word "assault" is used for effect


Right, and we use other words "for effect"--like robbery, burglary, unlawful imprisonment, larceny, etc. --when other actions are committed without consent.
Quote:
Well hell, by that definition if I am standing next to you on the subway and brush your ass with the back of my hand as the train lurches then have I have just committed sexual assault. There was non consensual contact between me and your fanny, a well known erotic zone....


If you intentionally touched me, and you continue to touch me, without my consent, yes, you would be guilty of a crime.

Just as people have a right to protect their property from being taken by others, they have a right to protect the privacy of their bodies.


BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Oct, 2011 02:45 am
@firefly,
Quote:
you continue to touch me, without my consent, yes, you would be guilty of a crime.


Where is the word continue come into play?

One kiss or one pat on the rear end in your dream world should be enough for an assault charge.

In fact that survey that you love so must that yield the crazy results that 25 percents of all college women are assaulted had a question about being unwanted kiss if memory serve me correctly.
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Oct, 2011 02:50 am
This man claimed a female acquaintance forced him to have anal intercourse with her. The judge didn't buy it.
Quote:
Sentencing delayed for man convicted of rape Dozens pack courtroom in support of Ndyat
By Paul Turenne ,Winnipeg Sun
October 12, 2011

About 40 people packed one of Winnipeg’s largest courtrooms Wednesday in support of a man recently convicted of raping a female acquaintance, but their backing didn’t convince the judge to let him out of jail.

Hilaire Ndyat, 43, was found guilty of sex assault in August and immediately sent to prison following a trial during which he claimed his victim forced him to have anal sex with her, then stole his sperm so she could have a mixed race baby.

Justice Gerald Chartier rejected the claim, calling it “simply not believable,” and found Ndyat guilty.

His sentencing was supposed to occur Wednesday but a delay in the preparation of his pre-sentence report has pushed that to January. His lawyer asked Wednesday to have him released in the meantime but Chartier denied the request.

Dozens of supporters stood when sheriffs brought Ndyat into court Wednesday. Some wept openly while others shouted supportive messages. Ndyat nodded quietly and formed a peace sign with his fingers.

Ndyat is executive director of the Winnipeg Afro-Aboriginal Crosscultural Association and was also involved in other community activities prior to his imprisonment.

“Lots of people have reaped the fruits of his labours,” Ndyat’s lawyer Brad King told court. “Freeing him as we await the pre-sentence report would help him continue his work, which people depend on.”

Prosecutor Jocelyne Ritchot said it’s unfortunate others will pay a price if Ndyat isn’t around, but that doesn’t matter.

“He’s been found guilty of a very serious sexual offence and in our opinion he poses a risk to public safety,” she said.

T’ai Pu, a supporter of Ndyat’s who was present in court Wednesday, said he and many others believe their friend was wrongfully convicted.

“We love this guy, we respect this guy, we miss this guy, and we’re going to do anything we can to bring him back. He’s a resource for the community that’s being taken away,” he said.

Ndyat testified at his trial that a woman he’d invited to his apartment in March 2008 forced herself on him and eventually tried to force anal penetration. He said he later became concerned when he discovered his used condom was missing.

“I thought she wanted a black man’s sperm as she mentioned earlier during the conversation that she’d like to have a mixed child, (she was) using me as a sperm donor by stealing sperm from me,” he wrote in a 2008 statement to police and his employer.

The victim, meanwhile, testified that she began feeling sick after Ndyat passed her an already-opened beer, then lost consciousness and later awoke to find him in the midst of raping her.

Ndyat will be sentenced Jan. 18. Ritchot said the Crown will seek at least five years.
http://www.winnipegsun.com/2011/10/12/sentencing-delayed-for-man-convicted-of-rape
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Oct, 2011 02:53 am
@BillRM,
Quote:
Where is the word continue come into play?
I think we could safely bet money that the word "continuous" is not written into the statutes of NY which define criminal sexual contact. The feminists have made it crystal clear that unwanted sexual advance is a matter for the criminal code and we know from the redefinition of rape that they dont think that the woman ever needs to say no, there is no way in hell that these man hating bitches are going to allow men even one free shot at sexual contact before they can call the cops to cuff us...
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Oct, 2011 02:55 am
@firefly,
Quote:
About 40 people packed one of Winnipeg’s largest courtrooms Wednesday in support of a man recently convicted of raping a female acquaintance, but their backing didn’t convince the judge to let him out of jail.
we are going to see a lot more of this at least in America once people figure out what is being done, but I dont have a lot of faith in the Canadian willingness to stand up for freedom, but maybe they will surprise me.

Quote:
The victim, meanwhile, testified that she began feeling sick after Ndyat passed her an already-opened beer, then lost consciousness and later awoke to find him in the midst of raping her.
A tox screen run after the event showed date rape drugs in her system and was presented to the court I am sure.....OOPS, never mind, I forgot that when men are to be hung for sex crimes proof is not required.
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Oct, 2011 03:01 am
@hawkeye10,
Quote:
we are going to see a lot more of this at least in America once people figure out what is being done, but I dont have a lot of faith in the Canadian willingness to stand up for freedom, but maybe they will surprise me.

Stand up for whose freedom? The man is a convicted rapist--the supporters just wanted him out on bail until his sentencing. The prosecutor and the judge were correct--he is a danger to the community, he has been found guilty of a serious sexual assault. He belongs in jail until he is sentenced.

This was the news story of his trial...
Quote:
Sperm stealing alleged in rape case
By PAUL TURENNE, QMI Agency
April 29, 2011

WINNIPEG - A Winnipeg man on trial for rape claims he was forced to have anal sex with his alleged victim against his will, accusing her of stealing his sperm so she could have a mixed-race baby.

When asked by the Crown whether he thought pregnancy could result from anal sex, the man replied: "I'm not in the medical profession."

The trial of Hilaire Ndyat, 42, wrapped up in Winnipeg Friday, with Justice Gerald Chartier reserving judgment on whether he will find the man guilty of one count of sex assault. His decision is expected next month.

Ndyat, a native of the Democratic Republic of Congo who moved to Winnipeg in 1996, is executive director of the Winnipeg Afro-Aboriginal Crosscultural Association and is also involved with numerous inner-city and cultural organizations and committees.

Ndyat is accused of raping a female acquaintance inside his West Broadway apartment in March 2008, with the Crown suggesting he may have drugged the woman's beer before raping her.

However, while testifying in French at his trial Tuesday, Ndyat claimed it was the woman who forced herself on him and that he didn't resist because women are revered in his culture and he didn't know how to react to her advances.


Ndyat testified that he only resisted when the woman removed his condom and tried to force anal penetration.

"I found that disgusting. I pushed her away and ran to the bathroom to wash up," he said. "In my culture, anal sex is taboo."

Ndyat said he became concerned when he later discovered his used condom was missing and remembered the woman had told him of her fondness for mixed-race children.

"I thought she wanted a black man's sperm as she mentioned earlier during the conversation that she'd like to have a mixed child, (she was) using me as a sperm donor by stealing sperm from me," he wrote in a 2008 statement to police and his employer.

When asked on the stand whether he knew that anal sex doesn't lead to pregnancy, Ndyat said he is not a doctor.

"His version of the events insults our intelligence and defies common sense," prosecutor Lisa Cupples told court during Friday's closing arguments. "His testimony makes no sense."

Ndyat's counsel argued the woman's story is not credible and suggested Ndyat be acquitted.
http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/Crime/2011/04/29/18084976.html


And, his lack of credibilty got him convicted.
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Oct, 2011 03:07 am
@firefly,
Quote:
Stand up for whose freedom?
We are all in this together, so everyones

Quote:
The man is a convicted rapist
Should he be?

Quote:
the supporters just wanted him out on bail until his sentencing
according to the story they think that he is a victim of the government

Quote:
The prosecutor and the judge were correct--he is a danger to the community,
Maybe he is and maybe he aint..I dont trust that crowd

Quote:
he has been found guilty of a serious sexual assault
Should have been?

Quote:
He belongs in jail until he is sentenced.
Wake me when you DONT think a guy should be in jail after the girl he was with says she was not satisfied, THAT would be news.
firefly
 
  2  
Reply Sat 15 Oct, 2011 03:19 am
@hawkeye10,
Quote:
Wake me when you DONT think a guy should be in jail after the girl he was with says she was not satisfied

If you believe a man who thinks pregnancy is possible from anal sex, and who claims he was forced to perform anal sex by the woman so she could use his sperm to have a mixed-race baby, you're even dumber than I've been giving you credit for being.

That's the most insane defense I've ever heard in a sexual assault case. That's why he was convicted and why he's now facing at least 5 years in jail.

That you'd defend him figures....

You really do a great job of making a fool of yourself.



0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Oct, 2011 09:24 am
@firefly,
Quote:
If you take my car without my consent, you have committed a crime.


Can you see any exceptions to this, or is this written in stone?
BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Oct, 2011 09:36 am
@mysteryman,
Of course there is all kinds of exceptions to taking a car without the owner permission being a crime and Firefly is surely aware of them.
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Oct, 2011 10:16 am
@mysteryman,
Hell I could break Firefly car side window with a rock and then hot wire her car and drive off with it being shielded from any form of punishment by the necessity defense law under common law and in most states statutory laws.

If I needed her car to get a person to medical care in a life and death situation would be an example of not needing her consent to take her car in such a manner.

The devil is aways in the details.
0 Replies
 
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Oct, 2011 10:43 am
@mysteryman,
The issue under discussion is "consent"--A factor that is central in establishing criminal violations of many different types, including sexual assaults and autombile/vehicle theft (unlawful use or taking of an automobile).

Let's look at automobile/vehicle theft under New Jersey law
Quote:
Automobile & Motor Vehicle Theft

Theft by Means of Conveyance and Knowingly Riding in an Automobile that is Being Operated without the Owner's Consent

Joyriding or Unauthorized Use of an Automobile in NJ

The relevant New Jersey Law is contained at N.J.S.A. 2C:20-10(a), 2C:20-10(b), 2C:20-10(c) and 2C:20-10(d) and provides:

a. A person commits a disorderly persons offense if, with purpose to withhold temporarily from the owner, he takes, operates, or exercises control over any means of conveyance, other than a motor vehicle, without consent of the owner or other person authorized to give consent. "Means of conveyance" includes but is not limited to motor vehicles, bicycles, motorized bicycles, boats, horses, vessels, surfboards, rafts, skimobiles, airplanes, trains, trams and trailers. It is an affirmative defense to prosecution under subsections a., b. and c. of this section that the actor reasonably believed that the owner or any other person authorized to give consent would have consented to the operation had he known of it.

b. A person commits a crime of the fourth degree if, with purpose to withhold temporarily from the owner, he takes, operates or exercises control over a motor vehicle without the consent of the owner or other person authorized to give consent.

c. A person commits a crime of the third degree if, with purpose to withhold temporarily from the owner, he takes, operates or exercises control over a motor vehicle without the consent of the owner or other person authorized to give consent and operates the motor vehicle in a manner that creates a risk of injury to any person or a risk of damage to property.

d. A person commits a crime of the fourth degree if he enters and rides in a motor vehicle knowing that the motor vehicle has been taken or is being operated without the consent of the owner or other person authorized to consent.

A defendant is charged with a violation of N.J.S.A. 2C:20-10 under several circumstances. First, an individual will be charged with a Fourth Degree Offense if he did not intend to permanently deprive the owner of the motor vehicle, but rather temporarily used it without the owner's consent. The nature of the taking (temporary) is what distinguishes this crime from auto theft. If the defendant is found to have driven the vehicle in a reckless manner during the temporary heist or joyride, then an indictment for the Third Degree Offense may follow. It is important to note that penalties can be imposed upon those who simply ride in the vehicle if they are aware that it is being operated without the owner's consent. Accordingly, it is not always the takers of the car that get charged with an offense under this theft statute. .

Theft by Unlawful Taking of an Automobile
Where an automobile is taken with the intention of permanently depriving the owner of the vehicle then that charge of theft by unlawful taking, i.e., auto theft shall be filed. The charge of auto theft falls under N.J.S.A. 2C:20-3, New Jersey's Theft by Unlawful Taking Law.
http://www.newjerseycriminallawattorney.com/CM/PropertyCrimes/Autotheftandcarjacking.asp

It is a crime to take property without consent by force (robbery) or without force (theft).

The lack of consent is an essential factor in establishing the crimes of theft/robbery just as it is an essential factor in establishing a crime of sexual assault. "Consent" is not unique to sexual assault law.





BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Oct, 2011 11:03 am
@firefly,
Maybe there is a business model for renting a lawyer to go along with you in the back seat of your car on dates.

Along with someone able to do a field screening test for both blood alcohol levels and the common drugs.

We seem to be needing a hummer as a psychiatrist to check the woman mental health would also be useful.

Love the idea of being drag into court over if a consent was valid or not.

Our poor young men.
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Oct, 2011 11:07 am
A strange story to say the least.

These women must be dogs of dogs to need force to gather sperms samples.

The word hoax come to mind.


Harare, Zimbabwe (CNN) -- Police in Zimbabwe on Friday charged three women found in possession of 33 condoms containing semen with 17 counts of aggravated indecent assault in a case that may be a break in a string of sex attacks over the past two years by women targeting male hitchhikers.

Prosecutor Michael Reza told a court in Harare that the counts were for each of the 17 men who had positively identified the women as having sexually assaulted them in 2010 or 2011.

The women, all of them in their mid-20s, were arrested Sunday in Gweru, about 300 kilometers (186 miles) south of Harare, when their car was involved in an accident. Police found the condoms in the women's car. Police appealed to any other victims to inform police.

The three were taken Wednesday by police to Harare.

"Since Monday, 17 men came and positively identified the women as having raped them," said a police official in Harare who refused to be identified. "Most of the men said the women would offer a drink either laced with something to tranquilize them or were forced at gunpoint."

Watch Ruparanganda, a professor of sociology at the University of Zimbabwe said : "Some sections of the society use these sperm for ritual purposes. The thinking is that it can be used for regeneration of life since they are source of life (biologically). Some people think that they can have their bad luck gone by using semen. I am sure that explains all this we have been witnessing (men being forced)."

The prosecution identified the suspects as Rosemary Chakwizira, 24, Sophie Nhokwara, 26, and her sister, Netsai Nhokwara, 24.

They were to be held in custody until their next appearance, set for October 28, when more charges may be filed.

"We might have had more victims come identify these women," said the police source.

firefly
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Oct, 2011 11:34 am
@BillRM,
It's a shame you don't want statistics on serious sexual assaults of men included in the federal crime numbers for rape.
You apparently consider sexual assaults of men as being rather insignificant.

So much for your alleged concern for men.
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Oct, 2011 12:05 pm
Quote:
Oct. 13, 2011
Loophole robs rape victim of justice
By CHRISTINE VENDEL
The Kansas City Star

Earlier this month, a Jackson County judge sentenced Bernard Jackson, known as the Waldo rapist, to 18 consecutive life sentences for attacking four women nearly 30 years ago.

The victims testified against Jackson, and one of them spoke at his sentencing.

Irene — a woman raped in an unrelated attack in 1997 in Kansas City — wants to tell a courtroom about her experience and how it changed her life forever. She wants to help convict her attacker.

But she probably won’t get the chance.

A legal loophole prevents prosecutors from filing a rape charge against the professional cage fighter and convicted rapist recently linked to her attack through DNA. His DNA was linked to two other cases in other states. One victim had died, but Colorado authorities filed charges in their case last month. For Irene, who wanted only her middle name used for this column, the loophole was just one more blow in a series of disappointments.

Irene was 54 and a high school guidance counselor when a borrowed truck she was driving overheated on Troost Avenue one night. She didn’t want to ruin her friend’s truck by continuing to drive while smoke poured from under the hood.

So she grabbed her purse and started walking, looking for a phone. She didn’t get far when a man pulled up and offered a ride. She declined.

The well-dressed man offered again, as he drove alongside her. He told her she “shouldn’t be walking on Troost at night.”

Irene finally agreed and insisted: “Just take me to the nearest phone.” They drove one block when Irene heard the man’s cell phone ring from his pocket.

“I looked at him, like ‘Oh my God!’ ” she said. She knew she was in trouble. “I immediately started grabbing the door handle and he whipped the car into a lawn place parking lot.”

He parked close to a fence, hoping she couldn’t escape. But she kicked the door open, damaging it, and ran. She screamed for help as she ran along a sidewalk. Several vehicles drove by. No one stopped.

The man tackled her, dragged her into a yard and raped her while threatening to kill her. Afterward, he picked up a brick and told her to “run the other way or I’ll smash your (expletive) face in!” She ran into the street, right in front of a car. The driver took her to a police station.

Irene got the feeling that police officers thought she deserved what happened. She wishes she could see those same officers now.

Irene attended weekly therapy for years, but said “you just never get over it.”

Her view of law enforcement, however, has improved.

She met recently with Jackson County prosecutors who are trying to find a way to charge the suspect with something. Meanwhile, the cold case detective has treated her with respect and kept her informed.

“I told him, I wish the police would have cared half as much then as you do now.”
http://www.kansascity.com/2011/10/13/3206232/loophole-robs-rape-victim-of-justice.html

While I can understand why this woman would want the opportunity to testify against her rapist, so her rape would become part of the public record used to convict him, I hope she has some sense of justice from the fact he has received 18 consecutive life sentences for other rapes of other women. It is also heartening that the attitude of law enforcement toward rape victims, such as this woman, has improved over the past 14 years since she reported her rape.

Thank goodness for the DNA evidence that allowed law enforcement to finally crack the 30 year old cold cases against this serial rapist and put him behind bars for life. He apparently continued to commit sexual assaults until as recently as 20 months ago.
Quote:
Sep. 30, 2011
Jackson gets 18 life sentences for Waldo rapes
By TONY RIZZO and MARK MORRIS
The Kansas City Star

A Jackson County judge sentenced Bernard Jackson to 18 consecutive life sentences today for rapes he committed in the Waldo and Armour Hills neighborhoods almost 30 years ago.

A jury convicted Jackson, 53, in July of seven counts of rape, seven counts of sodomy and four counts of robbery in one of the city’s biggest cold-hit rape cases of the last decade.

Because of Jackson’s history as a prior and persistent sex offender, he faced minimum 30-year sentences for each of the sex-related convictions.

Jackson robbed and sexually assaulted four women who lived alone in 1983 and 1984. Each of the women testified at trial how an intruder surprised them in their homes, either late at night or early in the morning, demanded money and then raped them.

In addition to victim testimony, a crushing load of DNA evidence factored in the prosecution’s case. An analyst testified that she found six complete DNA profiles that matched Jackson to a certainty in that only one in 143 quadrillion unrelated people would have that genetic sequence.

Jackson already has spent more than 30 years behind bars, all on sexual assault charges. He also was a suspect in a string of rapes in Sacramento, Calif., in 1983 and 1984.

No trial date has yet been set for Jackson’s unresolved criminal case, in which prosecutors accused him of two more recent sexual assaults in the Waldo area.

Jackson is suspected of five attacks that occurred about 20 months ago and terrorized women who lived alone in that Kansas City neighborhood. Prosecutors have said, however, that they only had enough evidence to charge him in two of the crimes.
http://www.kansascity.com/2011/09/30/3176732/jackson-get-18-life-sentences.html
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Oct, 2011 12:06 pm
@firefly,
Or maybe Bill is opposed to handing the feminists a propaganda tool to beat men with. Real rape in Washington 2010 was the lowest since 1987, on a per capita basis you need to go all the way back to the early 70's to find such a low rate, the feminists need to find some justification for keeping the money flowing even though sexual assault of women is not much of a problem anymore. Government funding is required for the "men suck" indoctrination program, and competition for funds in Washington is getting more difficult, like any good beurocracy the feminists know that they need to be proactive in protecting the gravy train.

BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Oct, 2011 12:30 pm
@firefly,
Quote:
It's a shame you don't want statistics on serious sexual assaults of men included in the federal crime numbers for rape.
You apparently consider sexual assaults of men as being rather insignificant.



Sorry I can see the downside of destroying the ability to compare the tend in sexual crimes for a large fraction of a century and the only up side is for you graining a one time bump so you can falsely claim that rapes had taken a sharp upward jump.
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.09 seconds on 07/08/2025 at 10:03:58